On 31/10/16 08:59, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> Not sure how you got this impression from current discussion. On the
> contrary - people are working on this, and it was planned to be completed
> in 4.0, but eventually postponed.
This is really interesting.
But don't you need to remove the master s
Thx for the advice Barak!
I was looking for a roadmap to follow, like the "trello" one used for the
openshift project https://trello.com/b/nlLwlKoz/atomicopenshift-roadmap but
I was not able to find one. I love to hear things like the "SPM was planned
to be removed" as it gives me a better underst
On 31 October 2016 at 09:28, Sebastian Greco wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
> points out that customers
Maybe I missread, sorry. I interpreted that by design this was not a
feature and that it was not in any roadmap as current customers don't need
it, or at least I understood that from previous posts.
Happy to know this is planned to be a feature! :)
Again guys, thanks a lot for the help!
Sebasti
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
> points out that custom
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> VMs are not
> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I can't
argue with that,
On 27 October 2016 at 14:58, Sebastian Greco wrote:
> Ohh thx for the answer :) That's why the running VMs on that particular
> storage would only run on that host. One can do that in other hypervisors
> like vsphere or hyper-v. It would be a nice thing to have in rhv too imho.
>
Well, you can pa
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Sebastian Greco
wrote:
> Ohh thx for the answer :) That's why the running VMs on that particular
> storage would only run on that host. One can do that in other hypervisors
> like vsphere or hyper-v. It would be a nice thing to have in rhv too imho.
>
>
>
Asked ma
By design, host local storage is accessible from the host itself only and
that's why it cannot be used in shared storage Data Centres.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sebastian Greco
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a technical reason for not being able to use the local host
> storage if that host is
Ohh thx for the answer :) That's why the running VMs on that particular
storage would only run on that host. One can do that in other hypervisors
like vsphere or hyper-v. It would be a nice thing to have in rhv too imho.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Elad Ben Aharon
wrote:
> By design, host
Hi,
Is there a technical reason for not being able to use the local host
storage if that host is already in a cluster with shared storage?
For instance, if a user has a server with with a lot of storage and he
wants to use that storage for non HA VMs that will only run over that host
while, that
11 matches
Mail list logo
