Hi Amar, I would like to test Cluster v6 , but as I'm quite new to oVirt - I'm not sure if oVirt <-> Gluster will communicate properly
Did anyone test rollback from v6 to v5.5 ? If rollback is possible - I would be happy to give it a try. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Apr 3, 2019 11:35, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan <atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Strahil, > > With some basic testing, we are noticing the similar behavior too. > > One of the issue we identified was increased n/w usage in 5.x series (being > addressed by https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22404/), and there > are few other features which write extended attributes which caused some > delay. > > We are in the process of publishing some numbers with release-3.12.x, > release-5 and release-6 comparison soon. With some numbers we are already > seeing release-6 currently is giving really good performance in many > configurations, specially for 1x3 replicate volume type. > > While we continue to identify and fix issues in 5.x series, one of the > request is to validate release-6.x (6.0 or 6.1 which would happen on April > 10th), so you can see the difference in your workload. > > Regards, > Amar > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 5:57 AM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Community, >> >> I have the feeling that with gluster v5.5 I have poorer performance than it >> used to be on 3.12.15. Did you observe something like that? >> >> I have a 3 node Hyperconverged Cluster (ovirt + glusterfs with replica 3 >> arbiter1 volumes) with NFS Ganesha and since I have upgraded to v5 - the >> issues came up. >> First it was 5.3 notorious experience and now with 5.5 - my sanlock is >> having problems and higher latency than it used to be. I have switched from >> NFS-Ganesha to pure FUSE , but the latency problems do not go away. >> >> Of course , this is partially due to the consumer hardware, but as the >> hardware has not changed I was hoping that the performance will remain as is. >> >> So, do you expect 5.5 to perform less than 3.12 ? >> >> Some info: >> Volume Name: engine >> Type: Replicate >> Volume ID: 30ca1cc2-f2f7-4749-9e2e-cee9d7099ded >> Status: Started >> Snapshot Count: 0 >> Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 >> Transport-type: tcp >> Bricks: >> Brick1: ovirt1:/gluster_bricks/engine/engine >> Brick2: ovirt2:/gluster_bricks/engine/engine >> Brick3: ovirt3:/gluster_bricks/engine/engine (arbiter) >> Options Reconfigured: >> performance.client-io-threads: off >> nfs.disable: on >> transport.address-family: inet >> performance.quick-read: off >> performance.read-ahead: off >> performance.io-cache: off >> performance.low-prio-threads: 32 >> network.remote-dio: off >> cluster.eager-lock: enable >> cluster.quorum-type: auto >> cluster.server-quorum-type: server >> cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full >> cluster.locking-scheme: granular >> cluster.shd-max-threads: 8 >> cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000 >> features.shard: on >> user.cifs: off >> storage.owner-uid: 36 >> storage.owner-gid: 36 >> network.ping-timeout: 30 >> performance.strict-o-direct: on >> cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable >> cluster.enable-shared-storage: enable >> >> Network: 1 gbit/s >> >> Filesystem:XFS >> >> Best Regards, >> Strahil Nikolov >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> gluster-us...@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > -- > Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/6AUTCXEZPQGOUYF4CAIGIRHNUFH6TEUL/
