[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-04-29 Thread Thomas Hoberg
oVirt isn't exactly a trivial piece of software. Actually I'd say it's not even a piece of software, as the integration of the various companies whose fully independent products now make up oVirt, never fully happened. oVirt is Redhat Linux, Qumranet (KVM+Spice), Ansible (Ansible), GlusterFS

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-04-17 Thread Alex Crow via Users
Hi all, The one big question I have, is: is Oracle contributing back to oVirt or do they plan to do so? It seems there are still some talented people working on both, so why not pool that talent? Best Alex ___ Users mailing list --

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-03-13 Thread John
Chance of a reprieve perhaps? On 12/03/2024 19:37, itsav...@gmail.com wrote: Oracle employee here, don't be surprised if you see an uptick in development activity, with the changes going in the virtualization market. That is all I can say. ___ Users

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-03-12 Thread itsavant
Oracle employee here, don't be surprised if you see an uptick in development activity, with the changes going in the virtualization market. That is all I can say. ___ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-01-07 Thread paktosan
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2023, 16:01:49 CET schrieb Jorge Visentini: > Hi Julian, > > As far as I know, Ceph with managed block storage is not supported by > oVirt... During Engine installation, you are asked if you want to enable Cinderlib (this is in Technology Preview) > Out of

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-01-03 Thread Jorge Visentini
In the future... maybe... https://harvesterhci.io/ Em qua., 3 de jan. de 2024 às 02:14, escreveu: > If Oracle is smart they would poach all the oVirt programmers from IBM and > take the lead in development. With Broadcom destroying VMWare, we are in a > real need for an alternative to Xen

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2024-01-02 Thread eshwayri
If Oracle is smart they would poach all the oVirt programmers from IBM and take the lead in development. With Broadcom destroying VMWare, we are in a real need for an alternative to Xen and Proxmox. I wouldn't have included Proxmox a few months ago, but at least it's being actively developed.

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2023-12-27 Thread Thomas Hoberg
In theory, if oVirt supports it, the Oracle variant would do it to... unless they manage to break it. And since there is zero information on what they test, that could happen at any time. Same for HCI with GlusterFS or VDO. HCI has been removed as "a tested feature", but if you use the

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2023-12-27 Thread Jorge Visentini
Hi Julian, As far as I know, Ceph with managed block storage is not supported by oVirt... Out of curiosity, did you use any documentation? Can you briefly describe us or give us a step-by-step guide on how you did the configuration? This interests me a lot. I would like to use managed block

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2023-12-27 Thread paktosan
Hi, Definitely surprising news. What I am very curious about: I could not find any mention of managed block storage with Ceph in Oracles documentation. We are currently using that in our Ovirt 4.5.5 cluster and seeing Oracle releasing something gives me hope that our issues with it may be fixed

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2023-12-21 Thread Thomas Hoberg
> Thomas, your e-mail created too much food for thought... as usual I would > say, remembering the past ;-) > I try to reply to some of them online below, putting my own personal > considerations on the table > Hi Gianluca, nice to meet you again! > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:44 AM Thomas Hoberg

[ovirt-users] Re: Oracle Virtualization Manager 4.5 anyone?

2023-12-21 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Thomas, your e-mail created too much food for thought... as usual I would say, remembering the past ;-) I try to reply to some of them online below, putting my own personal considerations on the table On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:44 AM Thomas Hoberg wrote: > Redhat's decision to shut down RHV