Typo ☹ 2 x 1 TB for boot in RAID 1 and then the rest as stated..
-Original Message-
From: femi adegoke
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 8:52 AM
To: users@ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: up and running with ovirt 4.2 and gluster
> Same here… I am using Dell R710s with 8 disks, 2 x
> Same here… I am using Dell R710s with 8 disks, 2 x 1TB in RAID 0 and then 6
> virtual
> disks, one per physical disks. I think you have to do it that way for the
> dell perc
> controller to present the disk to the OS but I haven’t actually tried not
> doing that so
> not sure.. anyway this w
Correct no raid on the two 2tb SSDs I plan on using replica three HCI setup
with no arbiter so each host will have a copy of data
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 11:39 AM femi adegoke,
wrote:
> Thanks Jayme for replying.
>
> In your case, there is no RAID on your 2 x 2TB SSDs?
> __
: [ovirt-users] Re: up and running with ovirt 4.2 and gluster
Hello,
In my case I'm referring to hosts with internal disks.
Example of my hardware config:
host0:
2x250GB SSDs in RAID 1 mirror for OS/boot disk
2x2TB SSDs in JBOD (passthrough) represented as separate disks in the
Thanks Jayme for replying.
In your case, there is no RAID on your 2 x 2TB SSDs?
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Co
Hello,
In my case I'm referring to hosts with internal disks.
Example of my hardware config:
host0:
2x250GB SSDs in RAID 1 mirror for OS/boot disk
2x2TB SSDs in JBOD (passthrough) represented as separate disks in the OS
ex. /dev/sda and /dev/sdb
host1 and host2 have identical configurations.
-
@jayme
@william.dossett
When you say "JBOD", are these hosts with xx number of disks or hosts with a
physically attached JBOD?
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www
That was the intention but I'm unclear as to which is the better approach.
I intended to host all VM related data including OS on the data volumes
(split between data on sdb and data2 on sda).. but now it sounds like doing
VM os disks on a separate volume could be a better approach after reading
th
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:48 PM,
>
> Engine volume = the Hosted Engine storage domain
> vmstore volume = the storage domain hosting the OS disks for the VMs
> data volume = the storage domain hosting the data disks of the VMs
I assume the vmstore (instead of data volume) would be the "preferr
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Jayme wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I don't "need" to create only one data domain,
> I'm more or less trying to confirm whether or not it is proper to configure
> multiple data domains or if I was mis-understanding the setup procedure.
>
> So if I
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:00 PM, femi adegoke wrote:
>
>
> This is to ease setup of data backup. As VMs can be recreated from
> template/ISOs and only the application data can be backed up.
>
Ok, thanks for the heads up.
I've been setting up my VMs with a single disk.
Time to make that chang
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback. I don't "need" to create only one data domain,
I'm more or less trying to confirm whether or not it is proper to configure
multiple data domains or if I was mis-understanding the setup procedure.
So if I am correct, you are saying that if I have 2 JBOD storage dev
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 7:00 PM, femi adegoke
wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:48 PM, >
> >
> > Engine volume = the Hosted Engine storage domain
> > vmstore volume = the storage domain hosting the OS disks for the VMs
> > data volume = the storage domain hosting the data disks of the VMs
> >
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Jayme wrote:
> It's nice to know someone else out there has these questions as well.
> What I'd really like confirmation on is basically this: In a JBOD oVirt
> HCI configuration with multiple disk devices per host node is it possible
> to have just one data volu
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:48 PM,
>
> Engine volume = the Hosted Engine storage domain
> vmstore volume = the storage domain hosting the OS disks for the VMs
> data volume = the storage domain hosting the data disks of the VMs
>
Sahina,
So "best practice" is for every VM to have 2 disks: 1 f
Thanks -- we have a documentation update in progress. I'm looking into the
status of this one specifically and I'll get back to you.
I would *love* to have way more community contributions to our
documentation, so thank you very much for offering :)
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:01 AM wrote:
> I wo
It's nice to know someone else out there has these questions as well. What
I'd really like confirmation on is basically this: In a JBOD oVirt HCI
configuration with multiple disk devices per host node is it possible to
have just one data volume or is it necessary to create multiple data
volumes (
Hi James... I'm in sort of the same position... I have 6 JBOD drives in each
node. I am unsure if I am going to wind up with 6 data stores. I have 5 nodes
and have other problems related to when I add those nodes further complicating
the gluster issue. Hopefully someone can help clear this up
I would be happy to work on documentation... not quite sure how I start doing
that though. The previous post and others that detail the only actualy
datastores needed are data and engine was helpful. Having an additional
datastore for isos that would perhaps not need to be (frequently) backed
Thank you, that clears things up!
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/c
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:48 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have my ovirt 4.2 hci cluster up and running, but I have a probably
> stupid question.
>
>
>
> During the setup and in the documents it defaults to setting up the engine
> datastore/volume, a VMstore/volume and a data/volume…
>
Engine volum
> Why would they be setup by default via the cockpit if they are no longer
> needee?
>
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018, 1:13 PM femi adegoke, wrote:
I agree, that step alone is very confusing
- vmstore is/was "export" and is no longer needed
- iso domains are no longer needed
- The only domain
Why would they be setup by default via the cockpit if they are no longer
needee?
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018, 1:13 PM femi adegoke, wrote:
> There is no difference.
>
> I think those names were carried over from previous generations when you
> had to have an ISO domain for storing ISOs.
>
> Now you can
There is no difference.
I think those names were carried over from previous generations when you had to
have an ISO domain for storing ISOs.
Now you can store ISOs & VMs in the same volume.
___
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send
24 matches
Mail list logo
