Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-09 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 9 avr. 2017 à 11:25, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > > However, I tend to agree with closing the bug - I'd create a library > (module) *on top of the SDK* . The comment in the bug is

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-09 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 9 avr. 2017 à 11:25, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > However, I tend to agree with closing the bug - I'd create a library (module) > *on top of the SDK* . The comment in the bug is quite clear about it: > "The objective of the SDK is to offer the same that the API offers,

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-09 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra Machacek a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> Ho my good, in

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-09 Thread Oved Ourfali
Hi Fabrice, I think you got proper explanation from Juan. I think you should indeed consider whether to use the sdk or not, depending on whether it fits your needs. Regards, Oved On Apr 9, 2017 12:14, "Fabrice Bacchella" wrote: Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-09 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra Machacek a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py , for every >

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 20:06, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> >> > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 20:06, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul > > a

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 17:21, Ondra Machacek a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py , for every >

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > Seriously though - perhaps you could borrow code from our Ansible > module? See[1]. > > > > If the code already exists, why it's not

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Ondra Machacek
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a > different method with a different name that return a associated service, so > it's not possible to have a generic like: > > def

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Barak Korren
On 6 April 2017 at 18:00, Fabrice Bacchella wrote: > Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a different > method with a different name that return a associated service, so it's not > possible to have a generic like: > > def resolve(service,

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
Ho my good, in ovirtsdk.services.py, for every service, there is a different method with a different name that return a associated service, so it's not possible to have a generic like: def resolve(service, ...): id = . return service.service(id) because the generic call

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > >> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul > > a

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 16:12, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > Seriously though - perhaps you could borrow code from our Ansible module? > See[1]. > If the code already exists, why it's not already in the sdk instead of having to dig throw external code ?

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:47, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > > > > Perhaps in your case. Here[1] is an example of the ovirt system tests, > which were only partially converted (work in

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> Yes I'm starting to understand that

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:47, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > Perhaps in your case. Here[1] is an example of the ovirt system tests, which > were only partially converted (work in progress...) to v4 API. yes that really related to my use case. Another problem that I have with lack

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > > Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < > fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > >> Yes I'm starting to understand that

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
> Le 6 avr. 2017 à 15:32, Yaniv Kaul a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella > > wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Fabrice Bacchella < fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote: > Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is > pointless. > > The old skd3 code is just good to be thrown away. There is no hope > thinking about "migrating code". And as it's just a

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
Yes I'm starting to understand that thinking about migrating code is pointless. The old skd3 code is just good to be thrown away. There is no hope thinking about "migrating code". And as it's just a thin layer around REST calls, it's up to us to try to make something usable around that. So I

Re: [ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Yaniv Kaul
There is documentation online (and within the project). See http://ovirt.github.io/ovirt-engine-api-model/master/ There are tens of examples in the RPM (and online). See https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-engine-sdk/tree/master/sdk/examples HTH, Y. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Fabrice Bacchella

[ovirt-users] SKD4

2017-04-06 Thread Fabrice Bacchella
I trying to migrate my python code from sdk3 to sdk4, is there any migration doc, documentation help about that ? Even google is unable to find anything relevant about that. ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org