Re: [ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Dan Yasny
On Jun 14, 2016 5:37 PM, "Fernando Frediani" wrote: > > Hi Nir, > > I wouldn't say that the performance coming from LVM is significantly better than from a filesystem if the last is well built. In VMware the performance from a VMDK running on the top of VMFS5 and

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hi Nir, I wouldn't say that the performance coming from LVM is significantly better than from a filesystem if the last is well built. In VMware the performance from a VMDK running on the top of VMFS5 and from a RDM has no significant gain one over another. I've always preferred to have

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Nir Soffer
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote: > Hi Nir, > Thanks for clarification. > > Answering your questions: The intent was to use a Posix like filesystem > similar to VMFS5 (GFS2, OCFS2, or other) where you have no choice for how > the block

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hi Nir, Thanks for clarification. Answering your questions: The intent was to use a Posix like filesystem similar to VMFS5 (GFS2, OCFS2, or other) where you have no choice for how the block storage is presented to multiple servers. Yes I heard about GFS2 escalation issues in the past, but

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Nir Soffer
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Fernando Frediani wrote: > Hi there, > > I see that supported storage types in oVirt are: iSCSI, FCoE NFS, Local and > Gluster. We support iSCSI, FC, FCoE, NFS, Gluster, Ceph, Local and any posix like shared file system. >

[ovirt-users] Storage types in oVirt

2016-06-14 Thread Fernando Frediani
Hi there, I see that supported storage types in oVirt are: iSCSI, FCoE NFS, Local and Gluster. Specifically speaking about iSCSI and FCoE I see they use LVM on the block storage level to store the Virtual Machines. I just wanted to understand why the choice was to have LVM and if that is