https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168478 

SR-IOV target release 3.6 and you'll need appropriate NIC on your Host, 
supporting this functionality http://wiki.ovirt.org/Feature/SR-IOV 


Thanks in advance. 

Best regards, 
Nikolai 
____________________ 
Nikolai Sednev 
Senior Quality Engineer at Compute team 
Red Hat Israel 
34 Jerusalem Road, 
Ra'anana, Israel 43501 

Tel: +972 9 7692043 
Mobile: +972 52 7342734 
Email: nsed...@redhat.com 
IRC: nsednev 

----- Original Message -----

From: users-requ...@ovirt.org 
To: users@ovirt.org 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 8:22:17 PM 
Subject: Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135 

Send Users mailing list submissions to 
users@ovirt.org 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
users-requ...@ovirt.org 

You can reach the person managing the list at 
users-ow...@ovirt.org 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." 


Today's Topics: 

1. Re: console viewer for ovrit engine (Yue, Cong) 
2. Re: Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? (Darrell Budic) 
3. Re: VM failover with ovirt3.5 (Yue, Cong) 


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Message: 1 
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:03:11 -0800 
From: "Yue, Cong" <cong_...@alliedtelesis.com> 
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stira...@redhat.com> 
Cc: "users@ovirt.org" <users@ovirt.org> 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
Message-ID: 
<ed08b56256b38842a463a2a0804c5ac0326aeef...@svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 

So. It means the web-proxy should be installed into the engine inside the virt 
nodes where host the VM. 
The ovirt engine is with centos 6.6. 

I will have a try for this later. 

Thanks, 
Cong 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stira...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:31 AM 
To: Yue, Cong 
Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users@ovirt.org 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 



----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cong Yue" <cong_...@alliedtelesis.com> 
> To: "Simone Tiraboschi" <stira...@redhat.com> 
> Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com>, users@ovirt.org 
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:39:39 PM 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
> 
> Sorry. It is centos 7 for host. 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Yue, Cong 
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:38 AM 
> To: 'Simone Tiraboschi' 
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
> 
> Thanks for the reply. 
> Yes, I am using centos for host. What engine host in your definition? 
> Is the host PC where engine VM is running on the top? 

The physical host or VM witch runs the engine. 

> I am doing the walkthrough as 
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/10/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5 
> / 
> http://community.redhat.com/blog/2014/11/up-and-running-with-ovirt-3-5 
> -part-two/ 
> 
> I am glad to test your new 3.5.1 in my environment. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Cong 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stira...@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:02 AM 
> To: Yue, Cong 
> Cc: Gianluca Cecchi; users@ovirt.org 
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Cong Yue" <cong_...@alliedtelesis.com> 
> > To: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> 
> > Cc: users@ovirt.org 
> > Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:45:09 AM 
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I checked but also it saids there is no such package. It works now 
> > with my native client. 
> > 
> > Some strange.. 
> 
> The oVirt websocket proxy is part of the engine and it's by default 
> installed on the engine host when you install the engine; engine-setup 
> asks if you want to configure it or not. 
> Than, if you really need for your network design, you can also install 
> and configure the websocket proxy on a different host. 
> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/WebSocketProxy_on_a_separate_host 
> but this is already a special case. 
> 
> I read in this thread that you are using centos7 (also for the engine host?). 
> We didn't release oVirt 3.5.0 for el7 but we'll do since 3.5.1 which 
> is targeted just after Christmas vacation (you are welcome to help us 
> testing it on centos7!) so now you still cannot find 
> ovirt-websocket-proxy rpm for 
> el7 on the stable branch. 
> If you really need to install it right now on el7 you can try from 
> nightly snapshot. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Thanks, 
> > 
> > Cong 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > From: Gianluca Cecchi [mailto:gianluca.cec...@gmail.com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:07 PM 
> > To: Yue, Cong 
> > Cc: Donny Davis; aw...@redhat.com; users@ovirt.org 
> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] console viewer for ovrit engine 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Yue, Cong < 
> > cong_...@alliedtelesis.com > 
> > wrote: 
> > 
> > Thanks, but it saids there is no ovirt-websocket-proxy packges. 
> > I am using the repository of 
> > http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/yum-repo/ovirt-release35.rpm 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > Cong 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The package, at least in 3.5 is 
> > ovirt-engine-websocket-proxy 
> > 
> > 
> > Gianluca 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
> > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. 
> > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
> > reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you 
> > are the intended recipient, please be advised that the content of 
> > this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the 
> > sender's e-mail System Administrator. 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Users mailing list 
> > Users@ovirt.org 
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> > 
> 
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply 
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the 
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message 
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System 
> Administrator. 
> 

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that 
the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the 
sender's e-mail System Administrator. 

------------------------------ 

Message: 2 
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:08:03 -0600 
From: Darrell Budic <bu...@onholyground.com> 
To: "Kalil de A. Carvalho" <kali...@gmail.com> 
Cc: Amador Segundo <asegu...@redhat.com>, users@ovirt.org 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is 
possible? 
Message-ID: <b6ecaed5-7ce3-44d2-a4e8-90ef46b32...@onholyground.com> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 

I tried a quick iperf test a while back and got 3-4Gb/sec between a pair of VMs 
on separate hosts with a 10G infrastructure, no real tuning and no SRIOV. That 
met my needs so I didn?t try anything further. If you were aiming for 10G for 
all, you?d want to work on SRIOV I imagine, but they get pretty good 
performance even without it. 


> On Dec 19, 2014, at 4:49 AM, Kalil de A. Carvalho <kali...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> Dear Amador. 
> 
> No, unfortunately not. 
> 
> This was just a friend question, because he need VM with 10GB NIC's. 
> 
> Today he is using Xenserver, this solution does not attend his expedition and 
> he is research another solution. 
> 
> I told him about oVirt/KVM but this is a prerequisite to use. 
> 
> I will plan with him to try make a project to test a take the resolts. 
> 
> Best regards. 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Amador Segundo <asegu...@redhat.com 
> <mailto:asegu...@redhat.com>> wrote: 
> Virtio devices does not support speed, so we fake their speeds showing 
> "1000mbps" in Admin. Portal. If your boxes have 10gbps devices then your vms 
> are already taking advantage of that. Did you test it? Could you share some 
> results? 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Kalil de A. Carvalho [kali...@gmail.com <mailto:kali...@gmail.com>] 
> Received: Thursday, 18 Dec 2014, 22:59 
> To: users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org> 
> Subject: [ovirt-users] Using 10gb vNIC/vbridge into VM is possible? 
> 
> 
> Hello all. 
> 
> Today a follow work ask me if is possible to use vNIC or vbridge in a VM 
> managed by ovirt. 
> 
> What he wants is to have a virtual 10gb network to some machines. 
> 
> All hosts NIC's are 10gb. 
> 
> Is this possible? 
> 
> If yes how can I do it? 
> 
> Best regards. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Atenciosamente, 
> Kalil de A. Carvalho 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Users mailing list 
> Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> 
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> 
-------------- next part -------------- 
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... 
URL: 
<http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141219/e2a27490/attachment-0001.html>
 

------------------------------ 

Message: 3 
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 10:22:10 -0800 
From: "Yue, Cong" <cong_...@alliedtelesis.com> 
To: Simone Tiraboschi <stira...@redhat.com> 
Cc: "users@ovirt.org" <users@ovirt.org> 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5 
Message-ID: 
<ed08b56256b38842a463a2a0804c5ac0326aeef...@svr-ca-exch1.atg.lc> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" 

Thanks for the information. This is the log for my three ovirt nodes. 
>From the output of hosted-engine --vm-status, it shows the engine state for my 
>2nd and 3rd ovirt node is DOWN. 
Is this the reason why VM failover not work in my environment? How can I make 
also engine works for my 2nd and 3rd ovit nodes? 
-- 
--== Host 1 status ==-- 

Status up-to-date : True 
Hostname : 10.0.0.94 
Host ID : 1 
Engine status : {"health": "good", "vm": "up", 
"detail": "up"} 
Score : 2400 
Local maintenance : False 
Host timestamp : 150475 
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp): 
metadata_parse_version=1 
metadata_feature_version=1 
timestamp=150475 (Fri Dec 19 13:12:18 2014) 
host-id=1 
score=2400 
maintenance=False 
state=EngineUp 


--== Host 2 status ==-- 

Status up-to-date : True 
Hostname : 10.0.0.93 
Host ID : 2 
Engine status : {"reason": "vm not running on 
this host", "health": "bad", "vm": "down", "detail": "unknown"} 
Score : 2400 
Local maintenance : False 
Host timestamp : 1572 
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp): 
metadata_parse_version=1 
metadata_feature_version=1 
timestamp=1572 (Fri Dec 19 10:12:18 2014) 
host-id=2 
score=2400 
maintenance=False 
state=EngineDown 


--== Host 3 status ==-- 

Status up-to-date : False 
Hostname : 10.0.0.92 
Host ID : 3 
Engine status : unknown stale-data 
Score : 2400 
Local maintenance : False 
Host timestamp : 987 
Extra metadata (valid at timestamp): 
metadata_parse_version=1 
metadata_feature_version=1 
timestamp=987 (Fri Dec 19 10:09:58 2014) 
host-id=3 
score=2400 
maintenance=False 
state=EngineDown 

-- 
And the /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/agent.log for three ovirt nodes are as 
follows: 
-- 
10.0.0.94(hosted-engine-1) 
--- 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:33,716::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:44,017::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:09:54,303::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:04,342::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
 
Engine vm running on localhost 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:04,617::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,657::state_machine::160::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
 
Global metadata: {'maintenance': False} 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
 
Host 10.0.0.93 (id 2): {'extra': 
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=1448 
(Fri Dec 19 10:10:14 
2014)\nhost-id=2\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n', 
'hostname': '10.0.0.93', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 2, 'engine-status': 
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm': 
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False, 
'host-ts': 1448} 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,657::state_machine::165::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
 
Host 10.0.0.92 (id 3): {'extra': 
'metadata_parse_version=1\nmetadata_feature_version=1\ntimestamp=987 
(Fri Dec 19 10:09:58 
2014)\nhost-id=3\nscore=2400\nmaintenance=False\nstate=EngineDown\n', 
'hostname': '10.0.0.92', 'alive': True, 'host-id': 3, 'engine-status': 
{'reason': 'vm not running on this host', 'health': 'bad', 'vm': 
'down', 'detail': 'unknown'}, 'score': 2400, 'maintenance': False, 
'host-ts': 987} 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,658::state_machine::168::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(refresh)
 
Local (id 1): {'engine-health': {'health': 'good', 'vm': 'up', 
'detail': 'up'}, 'bridge': True, 'mem-free': 1079.0, 'maintenance': 
False, 'cpu-load': 0.0269, 'gateway': True} 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:14,904::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:25,210::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:35,499::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:45,784::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:45,785::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:10:56,070::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:06,109::states::394::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(consume)
 
Engine vm running on localhost 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:06,359::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:16,658::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:26,991::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineUp (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
13:11:37,341::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.93 (id: 2, score: 2400) 
---- 

10.0.0.93 (hosted-engine-2) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:18,339::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:28,651::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:28,652::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:39,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:49,338::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:12:59,642::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::327::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Current state EngineDown (score: 2400) 
MainThread::INFO::2014-12-19 
10:13:10,010::hosted_engine::332::ovirt_hosted_engine_ha.agent.hosted_engine.HostedEngine::(start_monitoring)
 
Best remote host 10.0.0.94 (id: 1, score: 2400) 


10.0.0.92(hosted-engine-3) 
same as 10.0.0.93 
-- 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Simone Tiraboschi [mailto:stira...@redhat.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:28 AM 
To: Yue, Cong 
Cc: users@ovirt.org 
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5 



----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Cong Yue" <cong_...@alliedtelesis.com> 
> To: users@ovirt.org 
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 2:14:33 AM 
> Subject: [ovirt-users] VM failover with ovirt3.5 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi 
> 
> 
> 
> In my environment, I have 3 ovirt nodes as one cluster. And on top of 
> host-1, there is one vm to host ovirt engine. 
> 
> Also I have one external storage for the cluster to use as data domain 
> of engine and data. 
> 
> I confirmed live migration works well in my environment. 
> 
> But it seems very buggy for VM failover if I try to force to shut down 
> one ovirt node. Sometimes the VM in the node which is shutdown can 
> migrate to other host, but it take more than several minutes. 
> 
> Sometimes, it can not migrate at all. Sometimes, only when the host is 
> back, the VM is beginning to move. 

Can you please check or share the logs under /var/log/ovirt-hosted-engine-ha/ ? 

> Is there some documentation to explain how VM failover is working? And 
> is there some bugs reported related with this? 

http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine#Agent_State_Diagram 

> Thanks in advance, 
> 
> Cong 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply 
> e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the 
> intended recipient, please be advised that the content of this message 
> is subject to access, review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System 
> Administrator. 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Users mailing list 
> Users@ovirt.org 
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
> 

This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that 
the content of this message is subject to access, review and disclosure by the 
sender's e-mail System Administrator. 

------------------------------ 

_______________________________________________ 
Users mailing list 
Users@ovirt.org 
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users 


End of Users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135 
************************************** 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to