On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Barak Korren wrote:
>
>
> Having said the above, I know vaguely that Red Hat has some
> all-on-nothing rules when it comes to licensing, so a mixed RHV/oVirt
> environment may not meet the RHEL/RHV licensing terms... Then again,
> I'm not a licensing expert...
>
On 23 December 2016 at 18:10, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> Is there any particular technical reason for this substantial difference?
> Clearly they are not the same sw but it seems strange to me this
> discrepancy.
This is because RHEV 3.6 engine was only supported on RHEL6 while RHV
4.0 engine is
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> in June 2016 oVirt 4.0.0 GA was released and I in-place upgraded from an
> existing 3.6.5 to it.
> In 4.0.0 release notes it was described as the method to use.
> I see that it still remains the same for 4.0.5:
> http://www.ovirt.
Hello,
in June 2016 oVirt 4.0.0 GA was released and I in-place upgraded from an
existing 3.6.5 to it.
In 4.0.0 release notes it was described as the method to use.
I see that it still remains the same for 4.0.5:
http://www.ovirt.org/release/4.0.5/
and also for upcoming 4.0.6 (RC5 at least) there is
4 matches
Mail list logo
