Re: Does the qpid-cluster command support SSL?

2012-04-12 Thread Pavel Moravec
Hi Paul, I think the answer is no, as all qpid-* tools are Python-based and SSL support in Python client is not resolved fully - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175 for details. Kind regards, Pavel Moravec - Original Message - From: Paul Colby p...@colby.id.au To:

Re: 0.14 cluster never survives more than an hour or so.

2012-04-12 Thread Pavel Moravec
Hi Paul, this usually happens as a consequence of cluster split-brain. Are you using CMAN (Cluster Manager)? (Technically, when split brain occurs, two (or more) qpid brokers think they are the elder nodes (elder node = the managing node, usually the node that is oldest in the cluster). But

Re: 0.14 cluster never survives more than an hour or so.

2012-04-12 Thread Gordon Sim
On 04/12/2012 04:08 AM, Paul Colby wrote: Hi guys, I'm having an issue with my new 0.14 cluster, where the same configuration was fine with 0.12. The cluster starts up, and all brokers are happy. Then, with no client activity at all, after some seemingly random amount time (usually around 30

Selective message acknowledgment in Java client (and C++ broker)?

2012-04-12 Thread Pavel Moravec
Hello, having Java client and C++ broker, I want to implement selective consumption of messages from a queue (something like JMS message selectors in Java broker). I.e.: 1) Having CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode, 2) In a loop through all messages of the queue: a) receive a message b) decide if to

Re: Selective message acknowledgment in Java client (and C++ broker)?

2012-04-12 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Pavel Moravec pmora...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, having Java client and C++ broker, I want to implement selective consumption of messages from a queue (something like JMS message selectors in Java broker). I.e.: 1) Having CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE mode, 2) In a

Re: 0.14 cluster never survives more than an hour or so.

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Colby
Thanks Pavel and Gordon, I really appreciate you guys getting back to me so quickly :) I'm not currently using cman. I hadn't been using it on 0.12 either. I suspect that split-brain is not the case, since the test cluster in question on on virtual machines all within a single host, with *very*