On Qua, 2013-05-15 at 17:01 +0100, Bruno Matos wrote:
On Ter, 2013-05-14 at 14:32 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 05/14/2013 02:03 PM, Bruno Matos wrote:
I don't understand the use of NONE vs ANONYMOUS, sometimes they seam
exchangeable... I saw ANONYMOUS in the Domain initialization of
On 05/16/2013 10:07 AM, Bruno Matos wrote:
It seams that if some message passes through the link before the
--max-negotiate-time the problem disappear. I think its because
AsynchIOHandler::readbuff only cancels the timer after 3 reads (as
stated in the code) and the interlink doesn't seam to
Unfortunately, we have only seen this issue in our production environment,
where there are large amount of incoming messages from the broker. If we
can reliably reproduce the issue, I will raise a JIRA. Some follow-up
questions:
1. Can we allocate more buffer space ourselves programmatically?
FYI: Here is note on changes to HA support in Qpid coming in the 0.22 release.
Migrating to new HA
===
Up to version 0.20, Qpid provided the `cluster` module to support active-active
clustering for Qpid C++ brokers. There were some issues with this module. It
relied on
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:44 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 05/12/2013 08:09 AM, Robert Seward wrote:
Let me know if I can provide more detailed information to identify the
issue.
The first thing is to understand the pattern of usage (since the numbers
you are seeing are very, very low).
