ProtonJ - Bouncy Castle Dependency

Hi Guys, ‘SslEngineFacadeFactory’ uses reflection on some bouncy-castle classes to load certificates and keys from the configured PEM files. Currently the code expects to find ‘org.bouncycastle.openssl.PEMReader’ but this has been removed and as far as I can tell

Re: [DISCUSS] removing the 'proton/contrib/proton-hawtdispatch' module

On 26 April 2016 at 17:37, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing > 'proton/contrib/proton-hawtdispatch' module. > > hawtdispatch itself doesn't appear to be seeing any development these > days, with only a handful of commits in the last

Re: [DISCUSS] removing the 'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module

On 26 April 2016 at 15:41, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > As per the subject, I'd like to suggest removing > 'proton/contrib/proton-jms' module. > > It was written as part of adding AMQP 1.0 support to the ActiveMQ 5.x > broker and then contributed to Proton, and used across

Re: Qpid source code reorg update

Another update. CI is now in decent, if not perfect, shape. I've added lots of suppressions for apparently real memory leaks. I'll send a separate email regarding those. Now that the vote on the migration to git has passed, I've raised two INFRA jiras to start the migration process:

Re: Filtering issues

If someone wants to point me at the doc for the C++ broker extensions to the selector syntax, I'll try to find some time to add support. Obviously we are still waiting on the official JMS over AMQP spec to define a complete filter syntax (hint: Robbie). -- Rob On 3 May 2016 9:17 a.m., "Vavricka"

Re: Filtering issues

Gordon Sim wrote > For the timestamp query, why are you dividing by 1000? The JMSTimestamp is > in milliseconds. Is 'tomorrow' a Date object? Thanks for pointing this out, I used same code for testing qpid c++ broker. Qpid c++ broker expects timestamp in seconds. When I removed division by