Re: Test message redelivery with qpid-receive

On 22/01/18 17:03, Jan Bares, WOOD & Co. wrote: Hi, Can I test message redelivery with qpid-receive? I would like to seem message delivered to alternate queue (DLQ), how can I tell qpid-receive to reject a message? It has no support for issuing a reject.

Test message redelivery with qpid-receive

Hi, Can I test message redelivery with qpid-receive? I would like to seem message delivered to alternate queue (DLQ), how can I tell qpid-receive to reject a message? Thank you for your time, Jan Jan Bares Calypso / Java Lead Developer Hradecka 10 Czech Republic Mobile: +420 776 333 676 In a

Re: Java Broker performance

Hi Tomas, We are currently looking into performance improvements for the Receiver. We will notify you after necessary changes are made and ready for testing. Kind Regards, Alex On 22 January 2018 at 11:20, Tomas Soltys wrote: > Hi Keith, > > I can confirm that sending is now much faster. > >

RE: C++ broker flow to disk

Thank you Gordon for the pointers, I have found some more documentation from Jakub Scholz in list archive. Kind regards, Jan > -Original Message- > From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 4:42 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: C++ broker flo

Re: C++ broker flow to disk

On 22/01/18 14:55, Jan Bares, WOOD & Co. wrote: I get qpid-config: error: option --limit-policy: invalid choice: 'flow-to-disk' (choose from 'none', 'reject', 'ring', 'ring-strict') with latest qpid c++ broker 1.37.0. Should I configure some module or is this feature no longer supported? As h

Re: Bidirectional route combined with binding to queue

On 22/01/18 15:05, andi welchlin wrote: Qpid.trace.id would be found in the message header, I think. Correct (with AMQP 1.0 it's in the message-annotations) So this would break anonymity. If by anonymity you mean there can be no way to distinguish which broker it arrived at first, then thi

Re: Bidirectional route combined with binding to queue

Hello Gordon, thank you for your answer. I forgot to mention that messages need to be anonymous in my environment, as well :-) Qpid.trace.id would be found in the message header, I think. So this would break anonymity. Any ideas? Kind Regards, Andreas On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Gordon

C++ broker flow to disk

Hi, I get qpid-config: error: option --limit-policy: invalid choice: 'flow-to-disk' (choose from 'none', 'reject', 'ring', 'ring-strict') with latest qpid c++ broker 1.37.0. Should I configure some module or is this feature no longer supported? As https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-433

Re: New user questions: Broker/AMQP versions

On 22 January 2018 at 14:17, Justin Ross wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:05 AM, gewesp wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm consulting with a company in the security business and we're > evaluating > > the use of QPID as a messaging platform. > > > > Q1: Supported AMQP versions of the C++ broker

Re: New user questions: Broker/AMQP versions

On 22 January 2018 at 14:17, Justin Ross wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:05 AM, gewesp wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm consulting with a company in the security business and we're evaluating >> the use of QPID as a messaging platform. >> >> Q1: Supported AMQP versions of the C++ broker (qpidd):

Re: New user questions: Broker/AMQP versions

On 22/01/18 14:05, gewesp wrote: I'm consulting with a company in the security business and we're evaluating the use of QPID as a messaging platform. Q1: Supported AMQP versions of the C++ broker (qpidd): * According to https://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-broker/index.html

Re: New user questions: Broker/AMQP versions

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:05 AM, gewesp wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm consulting with a company in the security business and we're evaluating > the use of QPID as a messaging platform. > > Q1: Supported AMQP versions of the C++ broker (qpidd): > * According to https://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-

Re: Bidirectional route combined with binding to queue

On 22/01/18 13:24, andi welchlin wrote: Hello all, I want to share an exchange between two brokers (bidirectional). I understood that the right way to do this is using a dynamic route like: qpid-route dynamic add $broker1 $broker2 $exchange_name qpid-route dynamic add $broker2 $broker1 $exchan

New user questions: Broker/AMQP versions

Hi all, I'm consulting with a company in the security business and we're evaluating the use of QPID as a messaging platform. Q1: Supported AMQP versions of the C++ broker (qpidd): * According to https://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-broker/index.html

Bidirectional route combined with binding to queue

Hello all, I want to share an exchange between two brokers (bidirectional). I understood that the right way to do this is using a dynamic route like: qpid-route dynamic add $broker1 $broker2 $exchange_name qpid-route dynamic add $broker2 $broker1 $exchange_name I also want to achieve that no m

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 0.29.0

There were 6 binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed. I will add the archives to the dist release repo and release the maven staging repo shortly. The website will be updated once the artifacts have had time to sync to the mirrors and maven central. Robbie

Re: Java Broker performance

Hi Keith, I can confirm that sending is now much faster. *C++ broker* $ ./Broadcaster 20001 real0m0.085s user0m0.027s sys 0m0.005s *Java broker* $ ./Broadcaster 20002 real0m0.876s user0m0.037s sys 0m0.011s However receiving is still much slower. *C++ broker* $ time ./Re