Re: Inter-connected dispatch-routers

2018-07-23 Thread Ted Ross
Unrelated to your symptom, there is a misconfiguration in your setup. You have two inter-router connections between your routers, one established in each direction (i.e. each router has an inter-router listener _and_ connector). You only need one inter-router connection. -Ted On Mon, Jul 23,

Re: Inter-connected dispatch-routers

2018-07-23 Thread Ganesh Murthy
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Ted Ross wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: VERMEULEN Olivier > Date: Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:18 AM > Subject: Inter-connected dispatch-routers > To: "users@qpid.apache.org" > > > Hello, > > I started 2 Dispatch-Routers (version 0.7.0)

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 0.35.0

2018-07-23 Thread Robbie Gemmell
There were 5 binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has passed. I will add the files to the dist release repo and release the maven staging repo shortly. The website will be updated once the artifacts have had time to sync to the mirrors and maven central. Robbie

Inter-connected dispatch-routers

2018-07-23 Thread VERMEULEN Olivier
Hello, I started 2 Dispatch-Routers (version 0.7.0) and 1 Broker-J (version 7.0.3) My first Dispatch-Router has an out autolink on a topic: router { id: router.10104 mode: interior worker-threads: 4 } listener { host : 0.0.0.0 port: 10104 role: normal

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid JMS 0.35.0

2018-07-23 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 My testing included the following: * verified signatures and checksums * built and ran tests from source bundle * ran Broker-J integration tests using 0.35.0 staging artefacts On 20 July 2018 at 11:10, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I have put together a spin for a 0.35.0 Qpid JMS client release,