On 4/5/22 15:33, Timothy Bish wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a release candidate for a 1.0.0-M5 Qpid ProtonJ2
release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly. I made a mistake and
went a step
to far when staging the maven bits and hit release instead of just
closing the
Hi folks,
I have put together a release candidate for a 1.0.0-M5 Qpid ProtonJ2
release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly. I made a mistake and
went a step
to far when staging the maven bits and hit release instead of just
closing the repository
which means they were synced to
I dont know about the code, which is why I have been suggesting
address string options, but the trace seems reasonable. You can/should
of course just verify the behaviour against a broker matches what you
actually want.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 17:03, rahul.sin...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
>
>
