+1
* verified checksums and signatures
* built successfully from sources
* ran successfully qpid-broker-j system tests with staged 0.25.0 artefacts
* ran successfully hello world example against trunk version of
qpid-broker-j
+1
* Verified the checksums and signatures on source and binary artefacts
* Ran Apache RAT
* Built from source and ran the tests (on Oracle JVM 1.8.0_144-b01 on
Mac OS X 10.11.6)
* Tested the staged maven artefacts with the Java Broker's system test
suite (master) and Joram test suite.
On 19
On 19 September 2017 at 15:50, Jiri Danek wrote:
> +1 (nonbinding)
>
> Used the maven repo with https://github.com/rh-messaging-qe/cli-java and
> executed the few tests there against ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT
> broker. Result is that
+1 (nonbinding)
Used the maven repo with https://github.com/rh-messaging-qe/cli-java and
executed the few tests there against ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0-SNAPSHOT
broker. Result is that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPIDJMS-314 is
apparently still not resolved (as expected), but without
+1
Built from source and ran tests (saw 1 (non recurring) test failure,
discussed off list with Robbie - looks like a ActiveMQ issue)
Ran Qpid Broker-J AMQP 1.0 tests (from master) using 0.25.0 client
-- Rob
On 18 September 2017 at 18:45, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Hi
On 19 September 2017 at 12:51, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 19/09/17 11:28, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> On 19 September 2017 at 11:20, Gordon Sim wrote:
>>>
>>> I did see the following test failures, but suspect this is just a
>>> configuration issue(?).
>>>
On 19/09/17 11:28, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 19 September 2017 at 11:20, Gordon Sim wrote:
I did see the following test failures, but suspect this is just a
configuration issue(?).
Failed tests:
On 19 September 2017 at 11:20, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 18/09/17 17:45, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have put together a spin for a 0.25.0 Qpid JMS client release, please
>> give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>>
>> The source and binary archives can be
On 18 September 2017 at 17:45, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a spin for a 0.25.0 Qpid JMS client release, please
> give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
>
On 18/09/17 17:45, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.25.0 Qpid JMS client release, please
give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.25.0-rc1/
The maven
+1 ... used the staged artifacts and run my tests against different
versions of Qpid C++ broker (including the latest master).
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 12:45 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have put together a
On 09/18/2017 12:45 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.25.0 Qpid JMS client release, please
give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.25.0-rc1/
The maven
Hi folks,
I have put together a spin for a 0.25.0 Qpid JMS client release, please
give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.25.0-rc1/
The maven artifacts are also staged for now at:
13 matches
Mail list logo