Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-06-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:40 AM Namitha, Nancy wrote: > > Thank Robbie and Gordon for the suggestion, when I debug further, I observed > that Consuming application was blocked even though the messages were there in > the queue it was unable to receive the messages, when I restart the consuming

RE: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-06-03 Thread Namitha, Nancy
at configuration. > > qpid-config: error: option --limit-policy: invalid choice: > 'flow-to-disk' (choose from 'none', 'reject', 'ring', 'ring-strict') > > Thanks & Regards, > Nancy > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-24 Thread Gordon Sim
I would advise using the qpid java broker or one of the activemq brokers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-24 Thread Robbie Gemmell
; > qpid-config: error: option --limit-policy: invalid choice: 'flow-to-disk' > (choose from 'none', 'reject', 'ring', 'ring-strict') > > Thanks & Regards, > Nancy > > -Original Message- > From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, Ma

RE: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-24 Thread Namitha, Nancy
from 'none', 'reject', 'ring', 'ring-strict') Thanks & Regards, Nancy -Original Message- From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 8:55 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39) On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 17:

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-19 Thread Rob Godfrey
On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 17:04, Gordon Sim wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:34 PM Namitha, Nancy wrote: > > Is Broker - J optimized for the below mentioned scenario. > > I believe the java broker will indeed perform better for synchronous > publish. Best thing is to run a quick test though. >

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-19 Thread Gordon Sim
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:34 PM Namitha, Nancy wrote: > Is Broker - J optimized for the below mentioned scenario. I believe the java broker will indeed perform better for synchronous publish. Best thing is to run a quick test though.

RE: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-19 Thread Namitha, Nancy
Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39) On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 5:09 AM Namitha, Nancy wrote: >I have deployed Qpid Broker C++ v 1.39 package on Ubuntu 18.4. > And have enabled persistence using linearstore libraries. And I am using > AMQP 1.0 Client Library for GO (https://g

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-19 Thread Gordon Sim
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 5:09 AM Namitha, Nancy wrote: >I have deployed Qpid Broker C++ v 1.39 package on Ubuntu 18.4. > And have enabled persistence using linearstore libraries. And I am using > AMQP 1.0 Client Library for GO (https://github.com/Azure/go-amqp) for > sending

Re: Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-19 Thread Robbie Gemmell
The C++ broker operates a journal flush on a timer, which defaults to 0.5 seconds. For AMQP 1.0 usage this timer is the only event that makes the broker flush the durable messages to disk, and it doesnt acknowledge a durable message until it has, so for synchronous sends (as it sounds like you are

Message Persistence in Qpid Broker C++ (1.39)

2021-05-18 Thread Namitha, Nancy
Hi Team, I have deployed Qpid Broker C++ v 1.39 package on Ubuntu 18.4. And have enabled persistence using linearstore libraries. And I am using AMQP 1.0 Client Library for GO (https://github.com/Azure/go-amqp) for sending and receiving messages. When I set the message to be