On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 8:11 PM Pete Fawcett wrote:
> Would you prefer that I submit a Pull Request for the current fixes or wait
> until further changes are made?
Either way
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 13:59, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:36 AM Pete Fawcett wrote:
> > I tried this but it didn't, initially, fix the problem.
> > It turns out that the current exception handling is causing the link to
> be
> > closed from within Connection object
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:36 AM Pete Fawcett wrote:
> I tried this but it didn't, initially, fix the problem.
> It turns out that the current exception handling is causing the link to be
> closed from within Connection object doDeliveryUpdated
>
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 09:35, Pete Fawcett wrote:
> Hi Gordon
>
> Thank you for the helpful response
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 11:18, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:56 PM Pete Fawcett wrote:
>> > *Questions:*
>> >
>> > Firstly, a simple work around is to check the link pointer
Hi Gordon
Thank you for the helpful response
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 11:18, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:56 PM Pete Fawcett wrote:
> > *Questions:*
> >
> > Firstly, a simple work around is to check the link pointer when moving
> > delivery pointers from 'pending' to completed
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:56 PM Pete Fawcett wrote:
> *Questions:*
>
> Firstly, a simple work around is to check the link pointer when moving
> delivery pointers from 'pending' to completed and discarding them if the
> 'link' is NULL . Does this suffice?
I think that would probably work. However
I have recently encountered a problem with the Qpid C++ broker failing due
to a segfault.
I have done some analysis and believe I have found the cause. I have a
proposed workaround, but I also have a question about the desired
behaviour and wanted to see what others thought before submitting a
