Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Java 6.1.0

I'm assuming the lack of additional votes/discussion mean that Lorenz suggestion is being followed? If so, a [CANCELLED][VOTE] follow up mail would be in order. Robbie On 27 October 2016 at 10:03, Lorenz Quack wrote: > Hi, > > While performing tests on this RC I found a

Re: SSL server

This seems to be saying that it is failing to set the max frame size, one of the first things the client does when opening the AMQP connection, because the proton transport has already been used. My only gues is that it has actually received data and given it to the transport before getting as far

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Java 6.0.5

On 24 October 2016 at 11:52, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: > Hi all, > > A release candidate for the next 6.0.5 release of the Qpid Java > Components has been created. > > A number of important defect fixes and improvements have been made in > this release. > The list of changes can be

Re: qpid monitoring tool in GO

On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:16 -0700, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote: > Alan, > > I was trying to use this one http://godoc.org/github.com/streadway/am > qp > > but not sure if it will work with any qpid broker or not, According to the README in the github repository, this code is intended to

Re: qpid monitoring tool in GO

On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 17:05 -0400, Alan Conway wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:16 -0700, rammohan ganapavarapu wrote: > > > > Alan, > > > > I was trying to use this one http://godoc.org/github.com/streadway/ > > am > > qp > > ... > > Second: The Go client is a wrapper for a C library, there

Re: qpid monitoring tool in GO

On 28/10/16 16:56, Andrew Stitcher wrote: If you go to godoc.org and search for AMQP there, you won't find the electron library anywhere near the top of the list. If you search for AMQP 1.0 you get nothing, so we should add that to the text somehow. That way at least those who know about

Re: java broker 6.0.2 OOM

Hi Ram, Hi Alex, The current RC for the Qpid for Java 6.0.5 release contains the fix for the issue you raised (QPID-7465 ). It would be appreciated if you had the time to test and verify that the RC in fact fixes your use case. See [1] for

Re: [Proton-c 0.14.0][Visual Studio 2013] Failing ssl unit test only in Debug mode

Hello Cliff, Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1336 Regards, Adel From: Adel Boutros Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 4:51:30 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proton-c 0.14.0][Visual Studio 2013]

Re: SSL server

On 27 October 2016 at 16:02, Artem wrote: > Hi, Robbie! > > Is it really open issue > and Proton-J support only ANONYMOUS SASL mechanism? > That JIRA is about Messenger specifically, one part of Proton, and I believe that

Re: Qpid broker 6.0.4 performance issues

Hi Ramayan QPID-7462 is a new (experimental) feature, so we don't consider this appropriate for inclusion in the 6.0.5 defect release We follow a Semantic Versioning[1] strategy. The underlying issue is your testing has uncovered is poor performance with large numbers of consumers. QPID-7462