Re: Microservices Exchange Queue Strategy

2019-06-12 Thread Rob Godfrey
Hi, On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 at 09:55, fea17e86 wrote: > Hi > > I want to use Qpid Broker-J and AMQP 1.0 to achieve and event and message > based communication between my microservices. I would like to hear your > thoughts on the following scenario: > > There are one or more microservices

Re: Microservices Exchange Queue Strategy

2019-06-12 Thread fea17e86
Hi Rob Thank you for your quick response. Is there some documentation available for "ensureNonDestructiveConsumers"? I couldn't find it in the Broker-J Book. The single LVQ sounds like an interesting alternative. Usually there will be a database IO, or calculation task run as a consequence of a

Re: sender.close() hangs

2019-06-12 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez Parejo
On 06/11/2019 01:00 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: I ran the server example against rabbitmq (with a modified client to get around the lack of support for dynamic addresses). It looks like the issue is that rabbit responds to a detach with close=true by sending a detach without setting the close. The

Microservices Exchange Queue Strategy

2019-06-12 Thread fea17e86
Hi I want to use Qpid Broker-J and AMQP 1.0 to achieve and event and message based communication between my microservices. I would like to hear your thoughts on the following scenario: There are one or more microservices subscribing to the same topic. All of the subscribers should receive all

Re: Negative Bytes Credit

2019-06-12 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Sidarth, I cannot see any negative effect from the error at the moment. I believe that WARN log level should be used to report the issue like this one. Though, it is unclear for me yet whether it is a client or broker defect. Kind Regards, Alex On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 23:50, sidarthsc wrote:

Re: Microservices Exchange Queue Strategy

2019-06-12 Thread fea17e86
Hi Alex Thank you for the link to the docs. You are right, connecting a fannout exchange to a topic exchange doesn't make any sense, I realised that by now too. I a mafter the flexibility the wildcard routing offers, that's the reason I want to use the topics. So it seems like it comes down to

Re: Microservices Exchange Queue Strategy

2019-06-12 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Hi fea, I would like to point out that there is a section in Qpid broker documentation about non-destructive consumers : http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-broker-j-7.1.3/book/Java-Broker-Concepts-Queues.html#Java-Broker-Concepts-Queue-EnsureNonDestructiveConsumers You can have a look into

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid Dispatch 1.8.0 released

2019-06-12 Thread Ganesh Murthy
The Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) community is pleased to announce the immediate availability of Apache Qpid Dispatch 1.8.0 Qpid Dispatch is a router for the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol 1.0 (AMQP 1.0, ISO/IEC 19464, http://www.amqp.org). It provides a flexible and scalable

ApacheCon North America 2019 Schedule Now Live!

2019-06-12 Thread Rich Bowen
Dear Apache Enthusiast, (You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to one or more Apache Software Foundation project user mailing lists.) We’re thrilled to announce the schedule for our upcoming conference, ApacheCon North America 2019, in Las Vegas, Nevada. See it now at

Re: Negative Bytes Credit

2019-06-12 Thread sidarthsc
Thanks Alex. Could you point to the broker code that logs this message? I'd like understand the context in which it's being logged, to see if I can reproduce the issue for you. -- Sent from: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html

Re: Qpid Broker-J - configure alternate binding in Node auto creation policy

2019-06-12 Thread tnaroska
Ha, this is perfect! You just saved my sprint! Cheers -- Sent from: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands,