Re: qpid drain scan all brokers

2011-12-20 Thread Alan Conway
On 12/19/2011 11:35 PM, Ilyushonak Barys wrote: Is there any way to get more detailed log/trace about the issue? The broker logs should show if the broker is in a cluster or not, there are a couple of 'notice' messages when the cluster starts up. -Original Message- From: Ilyushonak

Re: .NET to Java JMS interoperability

2011-12-20 Thread Carl Trieloff
Or, use the mapped message support in Java(JMS) and.NET. The docs on that are quite good and it uses the AMQP type system which means you get full interop across languages, platforms etc. I know quite a few people use it expressly for JMS - .NET message interop. Carl. On 12/20/2011 05:04 AM,

Re: .NET to Java JMS interoperability

2011-12-20 Thread Fraser Adams
Hi Jan, ISTR reading at one point that the .NET binding is a SWIG wrapper around the C++ qpid::messaging (though I could have just imagined reading that :-)). One thought if that is the case (totally an idle musing and I've no idea if it would work - I've definitely not tried it!!) is

Re: .NET to Java JMS interoperability

2011-12-20 Thread Carl Trieloff
Here is the JMS example http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.12/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch03s04.html On 12/20/2011 12:55 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: Take a look at this section of the doc http://qpid.apache.org/books/0.12/Programming-In-Apache-Qpid/html/ch02s11.html examples for C++,

Re: .NET to Java JMS interoperability

2011-12-20 Thread Chuck Rolke
The .NET Binding to C++ Messaging is not a swig binding. It is a full, C++/CLR interop package that directly connects managed .NET languages with the C++ Messaging client. If a native C++ client can send a specific message then so can your .NET client. -Chuck - Original Message -