Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1

+1 - Original Message - > From: "Ted Ross" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 9:17:20 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1 > > This is the vote thread for Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1 (RC1). Please > test and vote: > >

Re: Dispatch: Default value of authenticatePeer

On 03/08/16 18:23, Robbie Gemmell wrote: On 3 August 2016 at 18:08, Gordon Sim wrote: I think this is different from proton's behaviour (and from qpidd's) where the similar flags are false by default. (This is a distinct concern from the default sasl mechanisms enabled).

Re: Dispatch: Default value of authenticatePeer

On 3 August 2016 at 18:08, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/08/16 17:54, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> On 3 August 2016 at 17:37, Jakub Scholz wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> When I have listener configured like this: >>> >>> listener { >>> role: normal >>> host:

Re: Dispatch: Default value of authenticatePeer

On 03/08/16 17:54, Robbie Gemmell wrote: On 3 August 2016 at 17:37, Jakub Scholz wrote: Hi, When I have listener configured like this: listener { role: normal host: 0.0.0.0 port: amqp saslMechanisms: PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 linkCapacity: 1000 } Is it

Re: Dispatch: Default value of authenticatePeer

On 3 August 2016 at 17:37, Jakub Scholz wrote: > Hi, > > When I have listener configured like this: > > listener { > role: normal > host: 0.0.0.0 > port: amqp > saslMechanisms: PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 > linkCapacity: 1000 > } > > Is it really expected that

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1

+1 I built it from source code and run some of my tests including connections to Qpid C++ broker and various clients. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > This is the vote thread for Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1 (RC1). Please test > and vote: > >

RE: [Performance] Benchmarking Qpid dispatch router 0.6.0 with Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0

And how do you measure your throughput? > From: adelbout...@live.com > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Performance] Benchmarking Qpid dispatch router 0.6.0 with Qpid > Java Broker 6.0.0 > Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:38:12 +0200 > > Hello Ulf, > > I am sending messages with a byte array

RE: [Performance] Benchmarking Qpid dispatch router 0.6.0 with Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0

Hello Ulf, I am sending messages with a byte array of 100 bytes and I am using Berkley DB as a message store (which should be slower than having memory only message store, no?) With 1 consumer, 1 producer and no broker, I am at 33k msgs/sec if they are all on the same machine and I have set

Dispatch: Default value of authenticatePeer

Hi, When I have listener configured like this: listener { role: normal host: 0.0.0.0 port: amqp saslMechanisms: PLAIN DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 linkCapacity: 1000 } Is it really expected that it allows anonymous access? It seems that unless I add to the listener configuration also

RFI: PROTON-1272 & PROTON-1243

These fixes missed the beta cut-off by a few hours! PROTON-1272: This is a trivial fix that allows build tests to run correctly on more systems (RHEL 6 in particular) PROTON-1243: This is a serious bug in a basic functionality of proton-c reactor and its bindings (and maybe in the proton-j

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1

+1 * Downloaded distribution * Verified checksums * Verified that patch to DISPATCH-367 and relevant units tests are present. * Ran all unit tests successfully Thanks. - Original Message - > From: "Ken Giusti" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, August

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

On 3 August 2016 at 15:52, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/08/16 15:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> ActiveMQ 5.9.0 is rather old and its AMQP 1.0 support was fairly >> recent at the time, its changed a lot since then. You'll want to try a >> newer version. 5.13.4 is the current, with

Re: Queries - Qpid Proton AMQP

On 03/08/16 12:40, Sasikumar Ramasamy wrote: Hi Folks, I am a new bee for messaging service. My need is to parse reactive messages through network using core java. I tried to implement Active-MQ and kafka, but i got messed up. I can't find semantic Tutorials/Demo regarding this. And now i

Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1

+1 - passes oslo functional tests, simulator, and test clients - Original Message - > From: "Ted Ross" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 9:17:20 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Dispatch Router 0.6.1 > > This is the vote thread for Qpid

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

On 03/08/16 15:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: ActiveMQ 5.9.0 is rather old and its AMQP 1.0 support was fairly recent at the time, its changed a lot since then. You'll want to try a newer version. 5.13.4 is the current, with 5.14.0 currently under vote for release. Yes, if I recall correctly 5.9

Re: [Performance] Benchmarking Qpid dispatch router 0.6.0 with Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0

Hi, Excuse me if this was already mentioned somewhere, but what is the size of the messages you are sending ? FWIW, I'm able to get around 30-40k msgs/sec sustained with 1 producer, 1 consumer, 1 dispatch (4 worker threads) and 1 broker (activemq-5). The sender sends unsettled messages as

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

ActiveMQ 5.9.0 is rather old and its AMQP 1.0 support was fairly recent at the time, its changed a lot since then. You'll want to try a newer version. 5.13.4 is the current, with 5.14.0 currently under vote for release. On 3 August 2016 at 14:37, eric73 wrote: > Hello

RE: Qpid dispatch router issue

Hi Paolo, I try "route-container" instead of "on-demand" and it is the same problem of timeout. Thanks for the reply. Regards Eric -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-dispatch-router-issue-tp7648428p7648648.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

Hello Sim, I use Apache ActiveMQ broker 5.9.0 with AMQP1.0 on Windows 7 Entreprise. The clients run on Linux mint 17.3. -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Qpid-dispatch-router-issue-tp7648428p7648644.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

On 03/08/16 13:45, eric73 wrote: Thank Ted. I set "standalone" mode for the router configuration. But now the dispatch router seems have problem when it try to connect to the broker. Indefinitely, there is a timeout error after connection: "local-idle-timeout expired". What broker are you

RE: Qpid dispatch router issue

Hi, the role for the connector should be "route-container" not "on-demand". Regards, Paolo. Paolo PatiernoSenior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat Microsoft MVP on Windows Embedded & IoTMicrosoft Azure Advisor Twitter : @ppatierno Linkedin : paolopatierno Blog : DevExperience > Date: Wed, 3

Re: Qpid dispatch router issue

Thank Ted. I set "standalone" mode for the router configuration. But now the dispatch router seems have problem when it try to connect to the broker. Indefinitely, there is a timeout error after connection: "local-idle-timeout expired". Here is the dispatch router log: ... ... Regards -- View

RE: [Performance] Benchmarking Qpid dispatch router 0.6.0 with Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0

Hello again, As requested, I added a 2nd connector and the appropriate autoLinks on the same host/port but with a different name. It seems to have resolved the issue. 1 Broker, 1 Dispatcher, 3 producers, 0 consumers, 1 connectors --> 5000 msg/s. 1 Broker, 1 Dispatcher, 3 producers, 0

Queries - Qpid Proton AMQP

Hi Folks, I am a new bee for messaging service. My need is to parse reactive messages through network using core java. I tried to implement Active-MQ and kafka, but i got messed up. I can't find semantic Tutorials/Demo regarding this. And now i just figured out Qpid AMQP, which could be a

Re: Seeing a Qpid C++ master build failure in AppVeyor

On 03/08/16 00:26, Justin Ross wrote: This problem remains for me. Unless this is shown to be my error, it blocks the C++ release. The problem appears related to code that was recently changed. https://gist.github.com/ssorj/44fcffd57075ad230ec8d221bca8e92a