Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1

2017-04-04 Thread Ganesh Murthy
- Original Message - > From: "Ted Ross" > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:15:48 PM > Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1 > > Just for the record... I'm waiting for the Adel/Ganesh issues to shake > out before cutting

Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1

2017-04-04 Thread Ted Ross
Just for the record... I'm waiting for the Adel/Ganesh issues to shake out before cutting an RC2 and starting a vote. -Ted On 04/04/2017 12:55 PM, Adel Boutros wrote: Hello Ganesh, I have applied your patch and it works as expected. Regarding Solaris, do you need extra information for

Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1

2017-04-04 Thread Adel Boutros
Hello Ganesh, I have applied your patch and it works as expected. Regarding Solaris, do you need extra information for analyzing? Regards, Adel From: Ganesh Murthy Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 1:48:07 PM To: users@qpid.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Timothy Bish
+1 On 04/04/2017 08:44 AM, Keith W wrote: As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid-Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to-GIT-tt7661505.html#none In summary, the proposal is: Qpid Broker J: Current

Re: Support for Qpid cpp broker in java broker system tests

2017-04-04 Thread Rob Godfrey
I believe we should still aspire to separate out tests that use pure JMS and simply need to have certain queues/topics set up prior to test execution. Having a distinct set of "JMS tests" would be generally useful I think, however I understand that the current state of the Java System tests does

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
+1 On 4 April 2017 at 13:44, Keith W wrote: > As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: > > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid-Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to-GIT-tt7661505.html#none > > In summary, the proposal

Re: Support for Qpid cpp broker in java broker system tests

2017-04-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Ok, given the below and where the tests actually are now, I think it makes sense to drop the cpp profile support. Robbie On 4 April 2017 at 12:06, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote: > Hi Robbie, > > I am sorry, I meant to send the email into users list but somehow managed > to sent it

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Rob Godfrey
+1 On 4 April 2017 at 15:08, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > +1 > > > On 04/04/17 14:44, Keith W wrote: > > As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: > > > > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid- >

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
+1 On 04/04/17 14:44, Keith W wrote: > As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: > > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid-Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to-GIT-tt7661505.html#none > > In summary, the proposal is: > > Qpid Broker J: >

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Lorenz Quack
+1 On 04/04/17 13:44, Keith W wrote: As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid-Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to-GIT-tt7661505.html#none In summary, the proposal is: Qpid Broker J: Current SVN

Re: [VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
+1 On 4 April 2017 at 13:44, Keith W wrote: > As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: > > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid- > Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to- > GIT-tt7661505.html#none > > In summary, the

[VOTE] Migrate Qpid Broker J and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client from SVN to GIT

2017-04-04 Thread Keith W
As already proposed and discussed in the following thread: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Migrate-Qpid-Broker-for-Java-and-Qpid-JMS-AMQP-0-x-Client-from-SVN-to-GIT-tt7661505.html#none In summary, the proposal is: Qpid Broker J: Current SVN location:

Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1

2017-04-04 Thread Ganesh Murthy
Hi Adel, I sent out an email to you before I saw our own Travis build indicated that it failed the same tests that you were seeing. I apologize. This pull request - https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/158/files - should work for you on RHEL 6.4. This PR passes on Travis as well as

Re: Support for Qpid cpp broker in java broker system tests

2017-04-04 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Hi Robbie, I am sorry, I meant to send the email into users list but somehow managed to sent it into dev :(. Here are our current intentions regarding system tests: * for new system tests (whether it is AMQP 0.x or AMQP 1.0) we would like to use AMQP management to create/change/delete

Re: Qpid Dispatch Router 0.8.0 Release Candidate 1

2017-04-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
I gave the router a try out, building against Proton 0.17.0. The build completed fine, all tests passed, and I ran the Qpid JMS HelloWorld against the built router. The signature and checksums verified fine, though the .sha512 checksum file should be renamed with .sha extension for consistency