+1
I checked:
1) checksum;
2) license;
3) notice;
4) signature;
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 6:34 PM fuyou wrote:
> +1
>
>=
>
> fuyou001
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> jinrongtong 于2024年2月13日 周二18:18写道：
>
>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>
>> This is
+1
=
fuyou001
Best Regards
jinrongtong 于2024年2月13日 周二18:18写道：
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.2.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release includes fixes for many issues, enhancements to stability,
> and also introduces
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 5.2.0 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release includes fixes for many issues, enhancements to stability, and
also introduces some significant features, including the million-level queue
and the implementation of the jraft controller.
The artifacts:
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 4.9.8 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc1/
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1309
Git
+1, I checked[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source
package.[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current
artifacts.In addition, it would be better to update the copyright year in
the notice file during the next release.
At 2024-02-13 17:53:29, "Gaoyang Cai" wrote:
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 0.0.2 RC1 of Apache RocketMQ Exporter.
This is the first formal release for Apache RocketMQ Exporter. All changes
since supporting Apache RocketMQ 4.x are included, as well as those making it
compatible to Apache RocketMQ 5.x. The group id of
