+1, I checked: [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[OK] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. 在 2024-03-01 15:15:46，"Zhouxiang Zhan" <zhouxz...@gmail.com> 写道： +1 On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:40 PM Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> wrote: +1, I checked: [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package. [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start [OK] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct At 2024-02-23 10:31:35, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote: >Hello RocketMQ Community, > >This is the vote for 4.9.8 RC2 of Apache RocketMQ. > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. > >The artifacts: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/4.9.8-rc2/ > >The staging repo: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1314 > >Git tag for the release: >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-4.9.8 > >Hash for the release tag: >2bdd53ef6694ffa19fd00db0b887e4895444f63e > >Release Notes: >https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2024/01/29/4.9.8/ > > > >The artifacts have been signed with Key : >EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys file: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > >Checklist for reference, >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases. >Fill in the following: > >[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. >[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. >[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. >[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. >[] License and Notice are correct in source package. >[] License and Notice are correct in binary package. >[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. >[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. >[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. >[] The code can be built success in the source package. >[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start >[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this >email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes >are reached. > >Please vote accordingly: > >[ ] +1 approve > >[ ] +0 no opinion > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > >Thanks, >The Apache RocketMQ Team
