Re: RemoteObject

Many thanks Prashant for your support! waiting to know about your progress :) Carlos 2018-02-21 7:27 GMT+01:00 Prashant Kumar : > Fine, I will investigate this today and update you on the root cause. > > > On 20-Feb-2018 1:53 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote: > > Hi Prashant, > > curious. I think we

Re: Substitutes in Apache Royale

Alina, In theory if you take -api–report=path to "Additional compiler options" in Moonshine and build project using "Project" -> "Build Project" you may be able to have report without using console. Thanks, Piotr 2018-02-21 9:36 GMT+01:00 Gabe Harbs : > Yes. I cannot imagine how we would have

Re: Substitutes in Apache Royale

Yup. I’d be happy to work on a tool which creates stubs, but we’re going to need the type info on properties and methods in order to do that properly. I don’t know how to add that to the report you created. I’m not sure where to get the type data of packages outside Royale other than the declare

Re: Substitutes in Apache Royale

Feel free to enhance the changes I made. -Alex From: Yishay Weiss mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> Reply-To: "users@royale.apache.org" mailto:users@royale.apache.org>> Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 at 12:25 AM To: "users@royale.apache.org

Re: Substitutes in Apache Royale

Yes. I cannot imagine how we would have managed the port without the stubs. You also get a list of TODOs in the app which can be gradually reduced as more of the app starts working correctly. Creating the stubs was something which took us about 2 weeks of intense work. A utility which creates s

RE: Substitutes in Apache Royale

The stubs were useful to have the app compile and to test functionality. Once there’s an app running, albeit with runtime errors, you can incrementally implement the missing parts. We were thinking that the report, if providing a complete description, could be parsed by an automation tool which