Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Hi, You might want to look at this for some performance data as well. It probably could be repurposed and create more current bench marks? https://www.jamesward.com/2007/04/30/ajax-and-flex-data-loading-benchmarks/ Thanks, Justin

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Reading the document. It uses AMFPHP and Baguetter AMF and the are transferring 76000 records to a Flex Client. I extracted the most interesting: *Adding Baguette AMF plug-in to the basic version of AMF PHP, makes the AMF faster than JSON and XML when transporting larger amounts of data thus provi

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Is good to know JSON is now more capable, I was imagining that. As you say some comparison test will be great. Maybe as we have some time we can do it. I assume that many people today will use JSON for new apps if the can setup all the interchange with something similar to AMF. If I was to create a

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Hi Carlos, I will try to read that in detail later. However, in a quick read, my takeaway is that the findings indicated that for up to 2000 data records, JSON was faster than AMF. And I believe the test was using the Flash Player, where we now have to consider that for Royale, the AMF deseri

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Hi Alex, I saw some comparison document online [1], let me know what do you think about it. For me AMF should not only be measured by its benefits on small size and transmission. In that field I think it should win, since json has more overhead, but as I'm not an expert in JSON, I'm sure some ser

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Very impressive! Great work! :-) Harbs > On May 31, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Forgot to share the info in Github page :) > > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Apache-Royale-communication-with-AMF-and-RemoteObject > >

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Hi Carlos, That’s great news! One thing I would like to see someday (not necessarily from you, maybe some other user) is a comparison of JSON vs AMF.For some real-world server response, what would be the number of bytes transferred and what would be the CPU processing time in the browser t

Re: Royale - BlazeDS working

Forgot to share the info in Github page :) https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Apache-Royale-communication-with-AMF-and-RemoteObject 2018-05-31 20:49 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi, > > I get Royale working with BlazeDS. People using BlazeDS should be able to > finally start developing wi

Royale - BlazeDS working

Hi, I get Royale working with BlazeDS. People using BlazeDS should be able to finally start developing with Royale now! :) Right now I'm test it with both the SampleAmfWebApp (in our repo) and with my own backend (real flex/java app), and seems to work in both. Things to have into account: While

RE: Work on Emulation

Thank you so much Alex. I didn’t noticed that while merging PR for SparkSkin. I will re-check spark-royale-manifest.xml , SparkRoyaleClasses.as ,mx-royale-manifest.xml and MXRoyaleClases.as for all emulated components. Thanks, Alina Kazi From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent

Re: Work on Emulation

Hi Alina, It looks like there was some confusion around step #8 in the wiki article. Classes like SparkSkin are used in MXML and thus should be added to src/main/resources/spark-royale-manifest.xml instead of SparkRoyaleClasses.as. The same may be true for the MXRoyale project and mx-royale-m