that. You should now see the comments.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2018-05-13 23:14 GMT+02:00 Serkan Ta
have a working mx.utils.Base64Encoder? If so,
that’s
great news! Please file a Pull Request with your code.
Thanks,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subje
t; *
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>> * http://rawgit.com/beatgam</a>
>>>>>>>>>> mit/base64-js/master/base64js.min.js"
>>>>>>>>&g
o,
that’s
great news! Please file a Pull Request with your code.
Thanks,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
e Piotr Zarzycki yazdı:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Serkan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just finished review of your pull request. I have added bunch of
>>>>>>> comments. It would be great to have some insight from other PMCs
your code.
Thanks,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it
not sure about some things.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-05-10 20:46 GMT+02:00 Serkan Taş :
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure that it is working with the test application but i'll give
Please file a Pull Request with your code.
Thanks,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
rkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting point of my implementation.
Tank y
y, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting point of my implementation.
Tank you so much.
Alex,
I now see the that i missed meaning of "has to g
the test application but i'll give a try to
>>>> have wrappers and than create PR.
>>>>
>>>> 10.05.2018 10:29 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Serkan,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> D
an Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting point of my implementation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Does that mean you have a working mx.utils.Base64Encoder? If so, that’s
>> great news! Please file a Pull Request with your code.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Serkan Taş
>&
ache.org>
<mailto:users@royale.apache.org>
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting point of my
implementation. Tank you so much.
Alex,
I now see the that i missed meaning of "
de.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *Serkan Taş
>
> *Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
>
> *Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
> *To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
>
> *Subject: *Re: is being brok
code.
Thanks,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş
*Reply-To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Date: *Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 10:00 PM
*To: *"users@royale.apache.org"
*Subject: *Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting p
an ASDoc comment for the
constructor function of a class. You can't put it anywhere in the class file.
Show us the code that isn't working if you are still not understanding what
I am saying.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/9/18, 1:45 PM, "Serkan Taş"
<mail
g"
Subject: Re: is being broken by the compiler
Hi Piotr and Alex,
Piotr;
I worked on your code and it was starting point of my implementation. Tank you
so much.
Alex,
I now see the that i missed meaning of "has to go in the ASDoc for the
constructor" in your mail belongs
4 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
>
> Hi Serkan,
>
> It is hard to tell from your description what you are trying, but as I
> mentioned in the other thread, the must be in an ASDoc comment
> for the constructor function of a class. You can't put it anywhere in the
> class fi
Alex Harui yazdı:
Hi Serkan,
It is hard to tell from your description what you are trying, but as I mentioned in
the other thread, the must be in an ASDoc comment for the
constructor function of a class. You can't put it anywhere in the class file.
Show us the code that isn't workin
;
> Show us the code that isn't working if you are still not understanding
> what I am saying.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/9/18, 1:45 PM, "Serkan Taş" wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> After working on the probabilities, i discovered that under several
&g
still not understanding what I
am saying.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/9/18, 1:45 PM, "Serkan Taş" wrote:
Hi Alex,
After working on the probabilities, i discovered that under several
circumstances the is being broken by the compiler.
Here is my case :
1. I cr
Hi Alex,
After working on the probabilities, i discovered that under several
circumstances the is being broken by the compiler.
Here is my case :
1. I created a simple class
2. Inserted inject_html section as first item in class
3. Built the project and can see that the script are
23 matches
Mail list logo
