Re: RTEMS5 checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a

On 2/2/21 4:36 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Indeed. It seems the sha512 has changed. The file doesn't appear to be > different > on the http server. I found a copy > at https://download.videolan.org/contrib/jpeg/ > that has a matching sha512sum as > we

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 5:16 PM Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > Can you point me at Sebastian’s driver? I haven’t been able to find it in > the repo. > Here's the trick. Look in rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h and search for the header guard from your BSP. It references an stmac driver which

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

Can you point me at Sebastian’s driver? I haven’t been able to find it in the repo. A > On 2021-February-01, at 16:05, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:54 PM Mr. Andrei Chichak > wrote: > Oh, crap, I’m off by 3 orders of magnitude, I’ve got

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:54 PM Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > Oh, crap, I’m off by 3 orders of magnitude, I’ve got 512KB. > That's an LWIP candidate. :) But Sebastian did a driver for libbsd for the H7 series. If you have more memory or can attach external RAM, that's an option. > Bother, I

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

Oh, crap, I’m off by 3 orders of magnitude, I’ve got 512KB. Bother, I need a nap already. A > On 2021-February-01, at 15:35, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:25 PM Andrei Chichak > wrote: > any guidance choosing between “Legacy Stack” and

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:25 PM Andrei Chichak wrote: > any guidance choosing between “Legacy Stack” and libbsd? > This one is easy. Please please please please do NOT choose the legacy stack. :) The legacy stack should only be used on projects that are using it and those are encouraged to move

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

any guidance choosing between “Legacy Stack” and libbsd? I’ve got a 512MB of RAM processor, so I expect that I’ll have lots left over. But that is TBD. A > On 2021-February-01, at 15:21, Joel Sherrill > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:03 PM Gedare Bloom

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:03 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:42 PM Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 2/2/21 8:32 am, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: >> > Is there any advantage to using bsd networking over LWiP, or vice >> versa? >> >> They are different stacks with different feature

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 2:42 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 2/2/21 8:32 am, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > > Is there any advantage to using bsd networking over LWiP, or vice versa? > > They are different stacks with different feature sets and different > hardware > resource demands. I am not familiar

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

On 2/2/21 8:32 am, Mr. Andrei Chichak wrote: > Is there any advantage to using bsd networking over LWiP, or vice versa?  They are different stacks with different feature sets and different hardware resource demands. I am not familiar with the features of LwIP so I am not the best person to

Re: Using LwIP on the STM32H7

Is there any advantage to using bsd networking over LWiP, or vice versa? With Robin’s BSP, if it gets released, I think I should be able to finish up my bsd networking BSP for STM32F7. I’ll also see what I can do about getting it going for F4 as well. Andrei > On 2021-January-29, at 12:21,

Re: problem in building BSP erc32

Ayushman, Have a look at https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/start/preparation.html#selecting-a-version-of-rtems If you think there are other places that might be helpful to point back to this section, it would be great to know. It is hard for us to emulate how new users navigate these

Re: problem in building BSP erc32

Thank you for your response. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021, 1:03 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Hi Ayushman, > > The 'master' branches default to the next version number for release. So > you would want to be using version 6, or else switch to version 5 > explicitly. For new development and getting involved

Re: problem in building BSP erc32

Hi Ayushman, The 'master' branches default to the next version number for release. So you would want to be using version 6, or else switch to version 5 explicitly. For new development and getting involved with RTEMS we recommend using the development versions. I guess we need to fix that

problem in building BSP erc32

Hello everyone , I am Ayushman (chetak123) Btech 2nd year new to the RTEMS organization . I have installed rtems5-sparc and trying to build BSP erc32 (https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/start/bsp-build.html) but I am getting BUILD FAIL while trying to do it using RSB and when doing it

Re: RTEMS5 checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, 11:36 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > Indeed. It seems the sha512 has changed. The file doesn't appear to be > different on the http server. I found a copy at > https://download.videolan.org/contrib/jpeg/ that has a matching sha512sum > as we expect in the RSB. > > I compared those

Re: RTEMS5 checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a

Indeed. It seems the sha512 has changed. The file doesn't appear to be different on the http server. I found a copy at https://download.videolan.org/contrib/jpeg/ that has a matching sha512sum as we expect in the RSB. I compared those two tar files, and found this: --rw-r--r-- 1 gedare gedare

RTEMS5 checksum failure file: sources/jpegsrc.v9a

Hi all, I have a quick test here that fails. This worked a few weeks ago. Thanks, -Matt mkdir quick-test cd quick-test/ git clone https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems-source-builder.git rsb cd rsb/ git checkout 5 cd rtems ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --source-only-download 5/bsps/pc RTEMS Source