RE: Anyone using Xiphos Q8 (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoc)?

: Anyone using Xiphos Q8 (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoc)? Hello, world Is anyone using Xiphos’s Q8 boards? It features a Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC and out of the box comes with an SDK for Yocto Linux 2.5 (sumo). I realize RTEMS has some support for a BSP using the Zynq UltraScale+. I wonder what the challenges w

Anyone using Xiphos Q8 (Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoc)?

Hello, world Is anyone using Xiphos’s Q8 boards? It features a Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC and out of the box comes with an SDK for Yocto Linux 2.5 (sumo). I realize RTEMS has some support for a BSP using the Zynq UltraScale+. I wonder what the challenges would be using RTEMS instead of Linux. Is it

Re: RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

uessing here but the console may be virtual through that > communications bridge to the main cores. > > --joel > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:35 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> >

Re: RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

te: >> > >> > Hi Mathew, >> > >> > Not that I'm aware of, so probably not. There is ongoing work that is >> > improving the Zynq Ultrascale+ support, and there is also work ongoing >> > for the Xilinx Versal, which shares some features i

Re: RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > Hi Mathew, > > > > Not that I'm aware of, so probably not. There is ongoing work that is > > improving the Zynq Ultrascale+ support, and there is also work ongoing > &

Re: RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Hi Mathew, > > Not that I'm aware of, so probably not. There is ongoing work that is > improving the Zynq Ultrascale+ support, and there is also work ongoing > for the Xilinx Versal, which shares some features includ

Re: RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

Hi Mathew, Not that I'm aware of, so probably not. There is ongoing work that is improving the Zynq Ultrascale+ support, and there is also work ongoing for the Xilinx Versal, which shares some features including R5F co-processors. OAR has been pushing on Ultrascale, but I couldn't tel

RTEMS on the Zynq Ultrascale+ R5

Has anybody started or completed porting RTEMS to the R5? Sent from my iPad ___ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: Zynq Ultrascale+

Trying the other list. Is RTEMS actually running on a Zynq Ultrascale? The instructions I found for the Ultra96 make me think 1) either it doesn’t actually work, or 2) there are undocumented assumptions including running the A53’s in 32bit mode. What I’m most interested in is running RTEMS

Re: Support for ARM A53 and Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+?

On 17/10/2018 12:38, emanuel stiebler wrote: On 2017-12-05 07:14, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, we don't have support for AArch64 in RTEMS, but you can run in 32-bit mode on these processors. We don't work on AArch64 support at the moment. It shouldn't be very difficult. Would there be any big

Re: Support for ARM A53 and Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+?

On 2017-12-05 07:14, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello, > > we don't have support for AArch64 in RTEMS, but you can run in 32-bit > mode on these processors. We don't work on AArch64 support at the > moment. It shouldn't be very difficult. Would there be any bigger issues, to get the AArch64 Toolcha

Re: Using RTEMS on Zynq ultrascale in 32bit mode

CPU and it doesn't admit SMP. It has been created for the last RTEMS release, the 4.11.3. We have been using it internally in my research group, but now that somebody has shown interest in using RTEMS with Zynq Ultrascale+ devices is the moment for us to share/release it. We would like t

Re: Using RTEMS on Zynq ultrascale in 32bit mode

last RTEMS release, the 4.11.3. We have been using it internally in my research group, but now that somebody has shown interest in using RTEMS with Zynq Ultrascale+ devices is the moment for us to share/release it. We would like to add it to the RTEMS sources, so some questions appear in my

Re: Using RTEMS on Zynq ultrascale in 32bit mode

-howto/index.html. Hope it helps. Best regards, Maxul Lee 于2018年10月10日周三 上午4:56写道： > Hello, > > we will have access to a Xilinx Zynq ultrascale+ soon. > It has 4xA53 cores. > If I understand it correctly they are based on AArch64 which is currently > not supported by RTEMS. >

Using RTEMS on Zynq ultrascale in 32bit mode

Hello, we will have access to a Xilinx Zynq ultrascale+ soon. It has 4xA53 cores. If I understand it correctly they are based on AArch64 which is currently not supported by RTEMS. However, running the processors in 32bit mode would be sufficient. I have some problems determining what is already

Re: Support for ARM A53 and Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+?

Hello, we don't have support for AArch64 in RTEMS, but you can run in 32-bit mode on these processors. We don't work on AArch64 support at the moment. It shouldn't be very difficult. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89

Support for ARM A53 and Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale+?

Hello, I'm wondering whether anyone plans to add support for the A53 architecture (maybe for Raspberry Pi 3?) and potentially a BSP for the Ultrascale+. And if there is existing work in this area, let me know! Thanks, Jacob Saina ___ users mailing list

Re: RTEMS in the Zynq Ultrascale+

ably, as it allows you to control everything from the Linux system running on the application cores. On 06-09-17 12:32, ARTURO PEREZ GARCIA wrote: Hi! Is anyone working on porting RTEMS to the R5 processors of the Zynq Ultrascale+. I'm going to face this task, but I would like to share this

RTEMS in the Zynq Ultrascale+

Hi! Is anyone working on porting RTEMS to the R5 processors of the Zynq Ultrascale+. I'm going to face this task, but I would like to share this effort with somebody. And, I have some doubts: -Can be used the RSB for ARM as it is for this goal? Or should it be modified -I suppose tha