Re: using docker to deliver qualification tools

2019-11-01 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Joel, thanks for your prompt reply and definitive answer. It helps to have clear boundaries regarding what is feasible or not. It's taken me a while to get back - I understand that you, Chris and Sebastian discussed this, and I recently had a good phone call with Sebastian where we discussed

Re: using docker to deliver qualification tools

2019-10-29 Thread Stanislav Pankevich
Hello, This is a comment for Andrew from a somewhat passive reader of the RTEMS forums. One way of having Docker while staying platform-independent is to use a "Docker without Dockerfiles" approach like described here: [1]. The idea is very simple: you delegate all provisioning jobs to Ansible.

Re: using docker to deliver qualification tools

2019-10-24 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019, 5:58 AM Andrew Butterfield < andrew.butterfi...@scss.tcd.ie> wrote: > Dear RTEMS users, > > give that the RTEMS-SMP qualification project requires a lot of new > tooling, some very standard, some more experimental, we have a proposal > that we distribute these using Docker

using docker to deliver qualification tools

2019-10-24 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Dear RTEMS users, give that the RTEMS-SMP qualification project requires a lot of new tooling, some very standard, some more experimental, we have a proposal that we distribute these using Docker CE (Community Edition). This will make it easier for users to install only the parts that they are