RE: servicemix move to karaf

Hi JB, thanks fort he update. Regards, Jörg -Original Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre Sent: Samstag, 19. September 2020 07:40 To: users@servicemix.apache.org Subject: Re: servicemix move to karaf Hi Jörg, The preparation is a bit longer than expected mostly to avoid just a move

Re: servicemix move to karaf

/bundles should be > done? > > Best regards, > Jörg > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre > Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2020 09:55 > To: users@servicemix.apache.org > Subject: Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes > &

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi, That’s bad: the design should be one camel context == one file. Regards JB > Le 11 juil. 2020 à 06:41, Sneharghya Pathak a écrit : > > Hi JB, > > In your example, all the routes are in the same file. In my scenario, the > routes are in separate files, but the camelContext id for each file

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi JB, In your example, all the routes are in the same file. In my scenario, the routes are in separate files, but the camelContext id for each file is the same. Is that design correct? Regards, Sneharghya On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm Jean-Baptiste Onofre, wrote: > Hi, > > It works fine in Kara

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi, It works fine in Karaf Camel example (https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/examples/karaf-camel-example ). Here’s what I did: karaf@root()> feature:repo-add mvn:org.apache.karaf.examples/karaf-camel-example-f

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi JB, As per your recommendation, I set up Karaf 4.2.9 with Camel 2.25.1. I deployed these routes in Karaf, and I am seeing the same thing there too. All the routes in a context are displaying the same name. Regards, Sneharghya On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:11 PM Sneharghya Pathak wrote: > Hi JB,

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi JB, Please find one of the routes below. http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.0.0"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0 http://www.osgi.

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi, It has been discussed some weeks ago on the dev mailing list. Parts of ServiceMix (bundles, specs) will move to Karaf and the ServiceMix distribution will move to attic. ServiceMix distribution is outdated and moving directly to Karaf and Camel will allow users to use updated versions. Re

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi Jean-Baptiste, You do encourage to use Camel in Karaf directly, being one of the most important comiter and part of the Apache Foundation, does it mean you are announcing the official end-of-life of ServiceMix ? Let us know, Regards, Francois On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofr

Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes

Hi, How do you set the route ID ? By the way, I strongly encourage you to use Camel with Karaf directly (with updated version) instead of ServiceMix. Regards JB > Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Sneharghya Pathak a écrit : > > Hello ServiceMix users, > > > I am using ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel

Re: ServiceMix

Hi, You can try by create a config file in the etc/ directory : etc/org.apache.cxf.osgi.cfg : with this content : org.apache.cxf.servlet.context=/cxf regards, François Papon fpa...@apache.org Le 02/08/2018 à 18:33, Jacob Kurian a écrit : > Hello, > I am using servicemix for one of my project

Re: (Servicemix 7.0.1) upgrade camel

Hi, it sounds good. An alternative would be to use your custom SMX distro. I would advise you to use the CXF version from camel (as camel uses ). It would avoid any conflict. Regards JB On 22/05/2018 09:49, Kareem AhmedAbdel Kareem | Ejada Sytsems Ltd. wrote: > I followed the below step to upgr

Re: ServiceMix 7.0 try to upgrade Camel from 2.16.4 to 2.17.x

I finally have time to make my test. it works very well Thanks again. Daniel -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-7-0-try-to-upgrade-Camel-from-2-16-4-to-2-17-x-tp5724329p5724384.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: ServiceMix 7.0 try to upgrade Camel from 2.16.4 to 2.17.x

Hi Dave, i will test that on next day. Regards. Daniel -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-7-0-try-to-upgrade-Camel-from-2-16-4-to-2-17-x-tp5724329p5724360.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ServiceMix 7.0 try to upgrade Camel from 2.16.4 to 2.17.x

Hi, I currently run 2.18.2 on servicemix 7.0. I've also run 2.17.x versions. There are some dependencies issues which are tricky to get around, but they're not well documented, as this upgrade is not encouraged. The usual advice is to stop running servicemix if you want custom versions. The simp

Re: ServiceMix 7.0 try to upgrade Camel from 2.16.4 to 2.17.x

Thanks. i figured it will be not so easy. first try - remove 2.16.4 and install 2.17.1 but without success... i will continue to try. -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-7-0-try-to-upgrade-Camel-from-2-16-4-to-2-17-x-tp5724329p5724335.html Sen

Re: ServiceMix 7.0 try to upgrade Camel from 2.16.4 to 2.17.x

Hi I think it is not so easy to replace the Camel version in the ServiceMix assembly. The simplest way is probably taking the source code, replacing the version and building the new assembly. I'm going to start work on ServiceMix 7.1.x next week which will have Camel 2.17.x installed. Kindly r

RE: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole

-Original Message- From: Mike Tod [mailto:m...@foundationmedicine.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 9:47 AM To: users@servicemix.apache.org Subject: RE: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole I have narrowed this issue down a bit I have a local copy of Servicemix 7.0 and Apache DS setup

RE: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole

-5319 direct m...@foundationmedicine.com -Original Message- From: Mike Tod [mailto:m...@foundationmedicine.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:36 PM To: users@servicemix.apache.org Subject: RE: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole I used this as a guide https://access.redhat.com/documentation

RE: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole

ginal Message- From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:31 PM To: users@servicemix.apache.org Cc: users@servicemix.apache.org Subject: Re: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole All depends the roles you have on LDAP or the role mapping. Webconsole ex

Re: Servicemix 7.0 LDAP and the webconsole

All depends the roles you have on LDAP or the role mapping. Webconsole expects admin as role. Regards JB On Feb 10, 2017, 19:28, at 19:28, Mike Tod wrote: >I'm working with Servicemix 7.0 and LDAP I have it working for the >client but can't seem to get LDAP working on the Webconsole. > >Seems li

RE: ServiceMix 7.0.0.M2 saxon for XSLT

Hmm, sorry, scratch that out. I was muddled - I get same errors in M1 version. So. Any thoughts on what I'd need to do to get Saxon >9.5 to work? -Original Message- From: BURN, James [mailto:james.b...@oup.com] Sent: 28 September 2016 16:02 To: users@servicemix.apache.org Sub

RE: ServiceMix 7.0.0.M2 saxon for XSLT

Hi Another test and this isn't an issue with ServiceMix 7.0.0.M1 ! Is Saxon somehow being missed from the classpath with ServiceMix 7.0.0.M2 ? James -Original Message- From: BURN, James [mailto:james.b...@oup.com] Sent: 28 September 2016 15:31 To: users@servicemix.apache.org Subject: S

Re: Servicemix 7.0.0.M2 Blueprint Core 1.6.0 clashes with Camel XSD

Hi We will integrate the next Karaf 4 version before the final release and the new Karaf release will include Blueprint Core 1.6.2. So I think, this issue will be solved. Regards Krzysztof On 22.07.2016 07:59, Maurice wrote: > But if we are overriding anyway, consider this which is resolved in

Re: Servicemix 7.0.0.M2 Blueprint Core 1.6.0 clashes with Camel XSD

But if we are overriding anyway, consider this which is resolved in 1.6.2 : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1540 --> Blueprint NamespaceHandler can't resolve XSD in offline mode -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Servicemix-7-0-0-M2-Blueprint-C

Re: ServiceMix 6.0.3 and Java 6 support

Hi Krzysztof, I will follow the ticket you opened in Karaf community. It says it will be fixed in Karaf 3.0.8. Then I just have to wait a 6.x version including Karaf 3.0.8 Thanks for the answer and for your time ! Regards, Sébastien -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122

Re: ServiceMix 6.0.3 and Java 6 support

Tha last versions which work with Java 6 are * 6.0.2 -- the versions from 6.0.3 have broken support * 6.1.0 has broken support for java 6 * 5.6.1 - broken * 5.4.4 - broken It looks like we had a problem with Java 6 support even in ServiceMix 5. On 06.07.2016 23:27, Krzysztof Sobkowiak w

Re: ServiceMix 6.0.3 and Java 6 support

Hi I have just tested and I couldn't start ServiceMix using Java 6. The support for this Java version seems to be broken. I tried the same with Karaf 3.0.x and the Java 6 support seems to be broken too - probably because some other projects have upgraded their sources to Java 7. I have reported

Re: ServiceMix and Spring Security bundles

Hi Blackman, > > Are you using servicemix 7 in production? > no, we are confident to have version 7.0.0 released before we need to install this current development release (before we were using servicemix 5.3.0 but basically on the spring, spring ldap and spring security ecosystem few has changed

Re: ServiceMix and Spring Security bundles

thank you very much it really Kind of you. Are you using servicemix 7 in production? can we use it production? could please give a snipet of your spring ldap servicemix configuration? and last could we use blueprint ans is it as powerful as spring under Karaf? thank you by advance --

Re: ServiceMix and Spring Security bundles

Hello again, So, here is the list of spring based bundles we are using, karaf@root>la -l | grep spring 47 | Active | 50 | 2.16.3 | mvn:org.apache.camel/camel-spring/2.16.3 101 | Active | 30 | 4.0.5 | mvn:org.apache.karaf.bundle/org.apache.karaf.bundle.springstate/4.0.5 106 | Active | 30 | 4.0.5 |

Re: ServiceMix and Spring Security bundles

We use spring security in our project, we have spent some time to find the right versions to use in order to make it work, give me some time and I'll send you the list of the bundle and feature we do use. Cristiano Il giorno ven 1 lug 2016 alle ore 11:55 blackman ha scritto: > Hello > > I'm

Re: ServiceMix 6.0.3 and Java 6 support

Oh sorry : I just ran servicemix executable with Java 6 in my environnement, like this : I downloaded apache-servicemix-6.0.3.zip from the Downloads page and verified the file i downloaded with gpg Then I unziped the file here /path/to/apache-servicemix-6.0.3 Then : export JAVA_HOME=/path/to/my

Re: ServiceMix 6.0.3 and Java 6 support

Hi Could you write what are you doing? Which operation causes this problem? Regards Krzysztof On 29.06.2016 16:10, sbsmxuser wrote: > Hi, > > According to SMX 6.x documentation SMX 6.0.3 should run with Java 6 (e.g. > the quickstart guide here >

Re: servicemix wrapper for spring 4 security-web

Hi David, Because it’s already an OSGi bundle. － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Feb 19, 2016, at 4:05 PM, david.maes wrote: > > Hello, > > We are migrating our projects to spring 4. We are running in an OSGI > environment and wanted to u

Re: ServiceMix 6.1.0 - feature:* or features:* command is not found

Try download again. -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-6-1-0-feature-or-features-command-is-not-found-tp5723376p5723377.h

Re: ServiceMix 6.1 Full

Hi We have decided not to support the full assemblies in ServiceMix 5 anymore (http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Which-assemblies-to-keep-around-td5719173.html). You can create instead a KAR file containing all necessary bundles and deploy it to the ServiceMix. Similar discussion wa

Fwd: Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Should go here Forwarded Message Subject:Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 21:21:34 +0100 From: Krzysztof Sobkowiak To: d...@servicemix.apache.org Hi After you install the bundle the system will assign a unique id to this

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

what does 20 mean (it means set bundle 211 to level 20)? why should i do it ? if i dont do it. why will be the problem? osgi:bundle-level 211 20 btw. as you mentioned it is better to do config in etc file instead of blueprint.xml how do i set httpj in etc. then later on i need to use JAVA DSL in

Re: ServiceMix, POI, and javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory

Using JB's pre-release POI servicemix bundle (org.apache.servicemix.bundles.poi-3.11.jar) fixed the ZipPackagePropertiesMarshaller and Krzysztof's suggestion about XMLEventFactory fixed the OSGI wiring. Since using the comprehensive bundle is my preferred solution anyway, I am a happy camper.

Re: ServiceMix, POI, and javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory

More info. Using POI 3.11, I get the following exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory.newFactory()Ljavax/xml/stream/XMLEventFactory; The execution seems to be finding the class and, in Oracle Java 7, newFactory is a method of the class. I verified that Servic

Re: ServiceMix, POI, and javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory

Adding javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory to org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra worked to get by the exception. If I add javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory as an import to my bundle it will fail to load which I guess is not a surprise since it is a class not a package (I did not look deeply

Re: ServiceMix, POI, and javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory

It's maybe a mistake in the OSGi headers. Can you check with bundles:headers as well ? Regards JB On 04/02/2015 01:38 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: Hi I don't understand why OSGi tries to wire the javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory package. It is a class. It means, the bundle declares from

Re: ServiceMix, POI, and javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory

Hi I don't understand why OSGi tries to wire the javax.xml.stream.XMLEventFactory package. It is a class. It means, the bundle declares from any reason wrong import. Could you check if appending this missing "package" into org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra parameter in etc/custom.prop

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Yes, resolve bundle-id doesn't work. Please simply install the bundle and restert the whole ServiceMix. Only this worked fot me. On 13.02.2015 18:45, dsjaxen wrote: > Hi! > For some reason the blueprint compatibility bundle fails to resolve. > > Its kind of annoying that when you say "resolve "

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Hi! For some reason the blueprint compatibility bundle fails to resolve. Its kind of annoying that when you say "resolve " on the console that you get no feedback whatsoever. (i.e. no success/failure or message about why it failed). I delete the data directory on startup, so it never resolves at

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Btw. I had next another problem: Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.jetty.server.Connector not found by camel-cxf-soap-route I had to add an import for org.eclipse.jetty.server. Regards Krzysztof On 12.02.2015 23:48, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: > Hi > > It worked for me.

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Hi It worked for me. 1.0.0 > 1.0 so it is included in [1.0, 2). I had to restart my ServiceMix -- refresh or resolve didn't help. I have done following steps: karaf@root> osgi:install mvn:org.apache.aries.blueprint/org.apache.aries.blueprint.core.compatibility/1.0.0 Bundle ID: 211 karaf@root> os

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Hi! The mvn:org.apache.aries.blueprint/org.apache.aries.blueprint.core.compatibility/1.0.0 solution did not work. It exports the reflect package at version 1.0.0. The "org.apache.cxf.cxf-rt-transports-http-jetty" v3.0.2 imports the reflect package as follows: org.apache.aries.blueprint.r

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Hi! Thanks Krzysztof! I will try those things. -Doug. -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/servicemix-5-4-0-cxf-jetty-blueprint-issue-tp5722268p5722271.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Btw. please consider a comment from CXF community: Even with the workaround, I strongly discourage people from configuring the jetty servers in their blueprint files. Since the servers are “shared”, you get into a “first bundle to create the port has the configuration that wins” situation whi

Re: servicemix 5.4.0 cxf jetty blueprint issue

Hi Could you please try to install the Blueprint Core Compatibility Bundle? karaf@root> osgi:install mvn:org.apache.aries.blueprint/org.apache.aries.blueprint.core.compatibility/1.0.0 Bundle ID: 216 karaf@root> osgi:bundle-level 216 20 You will probably need to refresh the cxf-rt-transports-htt

Re: ServiceMix 4 and Redhat 6 bundle loading Issue

L.S., It looks like something may have changed with regards to relative path resolution for those file:// URLs. Could you clarify where the features file is living and where the mse-bundles directory is, relative to the ServiceMix home directory? Also, how are you starting Apache ServiceMix (bin/

RE: ServiceMix 4 and Redhat 6 bundle loading Issue

>> Have you checked that your jar was compatible with the version of Java that you now have on your new OS The java version is the same on both Redhat 5 and Redhat 6 systems (Java 7). The entire application is deployed from the same tar file and that tar file contains everything needed for the ap

RE: ServiceMix 4 and Redhat 6 bundle loading Issue

Hi Have you checked that your jar was compatible with the version of Java that you now have on your new OS. This has caught me out before and we had to rebuild our jar with the version of Java which the OS has. HTH James -Original Message- From: kaydee [mailto:kays...@cisco.com] Se

Re: Servicemix 5.3.0 - KARAF_DEBUG=true - 5005 - Connection refused

I have opened an issue for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2408 Regards Krzysztof On 10.12.2014 21:54, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > Hi > > The problem has been solved in Karaf by > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3250. We should correct > our servicemix.bat script too >

Re: Servicemix 5.3.0 - KARAF_DEBUG=true - 5005 - Connection refused

Hi The problem has been solved in Karaf by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-3250. We should correct our servicemix.bat script too Regards Krzysztof On 10.12.2014 20:10, psr9988 wrote: > Hello Gert Vanthienen, > > Thank you so much for your quick response. The problem is solved. Wit

Re: Servicemix 5.3.0 - KARAF_DEBUG=true - 5005 - Connection refused

Hello Gert Vanthienen, Thank you so much for your quick response. The problem is solved. With Servicemix5.3.0, "set KARAF_DEBUG to true" is not enabling the debut port. When we start the service mix using /*C:\apache-servicemix-5.3.0\bin>servicemix debug*/. May be a bug in Servicemix 5.3.0. Than

Re: Servicemix 5.3.0 - KARAF_DEBUG=true - 5005 - Connection refused

Hi, In Eclipse, the default port in the remote debugging configuration is 8000, so be sure you have that set to port 5005. If that's OK, you could use netstat to check if anything is actually listening on port 5005 and on what interface it is listening. Also, is there a firewall running on your ma

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

Does that mean its a classloader or classpath problem? Not sure if this is something that can be fixed with some pom.xml wizardry or something else. Thanks again for the help. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:08 PM, wrote: > Looks like - Session 0x0 for server null, Session and that Exception isn’t

RE: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from"

w but. -Message d'origine- De : Sobkowiak, Krzysztof [mailto:krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 00:33 À : users@servicemix.apache.org Objet : Re: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from" Hi Sylvain In the s

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

Looks like - Session 0x0 for server null, Session and that Exception isn’t loaded. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Mark Webb wrote: > So when I add in the line: > * > to my pom.xml, I get the following error: > Bundle XYZ is not compatible with this blueprint extender > When I take out that li

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

So when I add in the line: * to my pom.xml, I get the following error: Bundle XYZ is not compatible with this blueprint extender When I take out that line from the pom.xml file, I get the following stack trace in the ServiceMix log file. It appears that I'm attempting to connect to HBase, but

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

Here, https://github.com/jgoodyear/ApacheKarafCookbook/blob/master/chapter9/chapter-9-recipe1/src/main/java/com/packt/hadoop/demo/hdfs/HdfsConfigServiceImpl.java Line 30 - we replace the TCCL with our class loader, then new threads that you pretty much can bet on  will be spawned by those exte

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "replacing the context class loader". Is this done in the java code, or the blueprint file? Thanks for your help on this. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mark Webb wrote: > I believe you are correct. I will add that to my pom.xml and see if it > helps.

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

I believe you are correct. I will add that to my pom.xml and see if it helps. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, wrote: > Replacing the context class loader is probably the trick you need, then > combining that with > > * > > > > > Is probably what you need. > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:59 AM,

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

Replacing the context class loader is probably the trick you need, then combining that with  * Is probably what you need. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:59 AM, null wrote: > I did write a chapter on that for the Apache Karaf CookBook. > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/apache-ka

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

Thanks for the response. I did read through the chapter, but I didn't see any reference to HBase which seems to be the culprit here based on the complex classloading that it performs. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:59 AM, wrote: > I did write a chapter on that for the Apache Karaf CookBook. > > >

Re: ServiceMix and camel-hbase

I did write a chapter on that for the Apache Karaf CookBook. https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/apache-karaf-cookbook The example code is here -  https://github.com/jgoodyear/ApacheKarafCookbook I just write to HDFS but I suspect you’ll get a head start from that stuff.

Re: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from"

Hi Sylvain In the stack trace I can ind following message Could not refresh JMS Connection for destination 'octopus.recepisse.out' - retrying in 5000 ms You routes below don't use destination named 'octopus.recepisse.out'. Do you have any other routes using this destination? Probably there is a

RE: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from"

I use the embedded activemq -Message d'origine- De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net] Envoyé : mardi 18 novembre 2014 12:29 À : users@servicemix.apache.org Objet : RE: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from"

RE: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to activemq : "already connected from"

Hi Do you use embedded active or standalone ? Regards JB Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Sylvain Mougenot Date:18/11/2014 12:07 (GMT+01:00) To: users@servicemix.apache.org Cc: Subject: servicemix 5.3.0 trouble with jms connection to act

Re: Servicemix 5 and JDK 8 compatibility

Thanks Michael. We will switch back to java 7 -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Servicemix-5-and-JDK-8-compatibility-tp5721700p5721704.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Servicemix 5 and JDK 8 compatibility

Hi Maggie, ServiceMix 5.0.x/5.1.x runs on Karaf 2.3.x which does not support JDK 8. You'll have to wait until ServiceMix updates to Karaf 3.x for that. This may take a while as the community is waiting for critical bug fixes in Karaf 3.0.2 and then potential integration into ServiceMix. Cheers, M

Re: Servicemix 5 and JDK 8 compatibility

Here are servicemix logs at startup: INFO: locking 09:52:26,205 | INFO | FelixStartLevel | fileinstall | 6 - org.apache.felix.fileinstall - 3.2.8 | Installed /opt/rocit/tools/apache-servicemix-5.1.0/etc/org.apache.activemq.webconsole.cfg 09:52:26,212 | INFO | FelixStartLeve

Re: ServiceMix 5 for Linux

Thanks for your replies. Regards Cédric -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-5-for-Linux-tp5721608p5721612.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ServiceMix 5 for Linux

Yes, we use single kit format for all platform now － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat On 2014-9-4, at 下午5:01, cedico wrote: > Oups, I suppose all the 5.x.x versions .zip packages integrates both Windows > and Linux platform... ? > > > > > -- >

Re: ServiceMix 5 for Linux

Hi Yes, we have merged both distribution into one zip file. It provides ServiceMix for both platforms. Best regards Krzysztof On 04.09.2014 11:01, cedico wrote: > Oups, I suppose all the 5.x.x versions .zip packages integrates both Windows > and Linux platform... ? > > > > > -- > View this mess

Re: ServiceMix 5 for Linux

Oups, I suppose all the 5.x.x versions .zip packages integrates both Windows and Linux platform... ? -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/ServiceMix-5-for-Linux-tp5721608p5721609.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1

Hi guys, it's what I said to Krzysztof in the Jira. I refactored the Cellar feature (starting from Cellar 2.3.2) to avoid the previous issue with the OBR resolver. I'm preparing a Cellar 2.3.3 release fixing a couple of issues in 2.3.2. Regards JB On 08/06/2014 10:31 AM, Walzer, Thomas wrot

Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1

Hi Krzysztof, I can confirm that Servicemix 5.1.1. & Cellar 2.3.2 now work without manual installation of Hazelcast. Cheers, Thomas.

Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1

pty... > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Achim Nierbeck [mailto:bcanh...@googlemail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 01. August 2014 09:28 > An: users@servicemix.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1 > > Hi, > > could you do a: > > la | grep -i "hazelca

Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1

at > org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.Closure.execute(Closure.java:120)[15:org.apache.karaf.shell.console:2.3.4] > at > org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime.CommandSessionImpl.execute(CommandSessionImpl.java:89)[15:org.apache.karaf.shell.console:2.3.4] > at > org.apache.karaf.shell.console.jline.Console.run(Console

Re: Servicemix 5.1.1 & Cellar 2.3.1

Hi, could you do the feature:install with -v for verbose? At leas it'll show which bundle it fails to install that obviously is already present. regards, Achim 2014-08-01 7:41 GMT+02:00 Walzer, Thomas : > Dear all, > > I tried to install cellar on smx 5.1.1: however there seems to be some > ki

Re: Servicemix 5 and cellar or Jboss Fuse and Fabric

Thanks Raul and Krzysztof for making things clear. Krzysztof: I will go through the documentation you have provided and as suggested will also try to reach JB to understand cellar little better. Regards Vaibhav -- View this message in context: http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/Servicemi

Re: Servicemix 5 and cellar or Jboss Fuse and Fabric

Hi FuseSource SMX was very similar to SMX because it growth from SMX. Then the development wend straight forward, we had Fuse Fabric, and now it evaluated into fabric8, which is very powerful tool/server to build complicated systems. But Fabric8 is rather another standalone Karaf distribution and

Re: Servicemix 5 and cellar or Jboss Fuse and Fabric

Well, saying that SMX is dead is absurd. SMX is a brand, more than a project with code ownership. It combines the Camel + CXF + ActiveMQ components running on top of Karaf, so that folks can download the stack and install it easily in one go. Saying that SMX is dead is equivalent to saying that t

Re: Servicemix 3.5

Hi, Sorry for bumping into a old thread. Would like to understand if there some is any support available for Servicemix 3.4.1? We are facing some issues in hot deployment when sometimes few of the SA's are not getting deployed properly and we have to delete th data folder and restart servicemix to

Re: Servicemix 5.1.0 camel drools example problem

I have created an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2342 to provide a working sample for stateful ksession. I'll try to find in Drools community the answer for this problem. Best regards Krzysztof On 09.07.2014 23:27, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: > Hi > > I can reproduce the problem to

Re: Servicemix 5.1.0 camel drools example problem

Hi I can reproduce the problem too. I don't know Drools very well. I couldn't find any example for Camel and Drools with stateful ksession. If you use as stateful kbase you have probably to define a persistence, but I'm not sure. After the person is processed by a rule engine it should have a dri

Re: Servicemix offline package installation

Thanks, Freeman. On 6/17/14, 7:01 PM, Freeman Fang wrote: Hi, This exception here is harmless but just annoying, the bundle is still generated and installed, we have issues[1] & [2] to track it. [1]https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXSB-75 [2]https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXURL-265 －

Re: Servicemix offline package installation

Hi, This exception here is harmless but just annoying, the bundle is still generated and installed, we have issues[1] & [2] to track it. [1]https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXSB-75 [2]https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXURL-265 － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part

Re: Servicemix offline package installation

JB, I was following with this thread because we are in a similar situation lacking internet access. On first startup, with a populated system folder, I get the following error: 17:34:40,647 | INFO | FelixStartLevel | core | 22 - org.apache.aries.jmx.core - 1.1.1 | Starting JMX OSGi agen

Re: Servicemix offline package installation

This information solved my problem thank you. I added a local repository location to etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg. And copied what i needed to my local repository with correct folder structure so it works. mvnrepository.com helps. I have tried some basics about servicemix, activemq and camel sampl

Re: Servicemix offline package installation

Hi, ServiceMix (Karaf) first looks for the artifacts in the system folder. If the artifact is not present in the system folder, then ServiceMix tries to download from the repositories defined in etc/org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.cfg. The system folder is a "local Maven repository" using the Maven di

Re: servicemix 5.0.1 "stops working" as soon as I deploy 3party jar

Hi, the 3rd party are bundles or "regular" jar files ? Do you use "wrap" to create bundles on the fly ? Did you try to install with osgi:install wrap:... Thanks Regards JB On 05/22/2014 11:04 PM, techy_bolek wrote: I did not have this problem with 5.0.0. As soon as I deploy a third party jar

Re: servicemix 5.0.1 "stops working" as soon as I deploy 3party jar

Hi Could you write which 3rd party libraries did you try to install? I have tested ServiceMix 5.0.1 with some libraries and I could not reproduce any of the problems you have described. Best regards Krzysztof On 22.05.2014 23:04, techy_bolek wrote: > I did not have this problem with 5.0.0. As so

RE: Servicemix 5 proxy problems

@servicemix.apache.org Subject: Re: Servicemix 5 proxy problems Hi ServiceMix 5 is based on Karaf 2.3.x and some things have changed. Please try to configure the proxy in maven settings.xml file. You can find here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9922467/how-to-setup-a-proxy-for-apache-karaf how to enable

Re: Servicemix 5 proxy problems

Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for your reply! I figured the .m2/settings.xml solution eventually, but it still didn't work. After some struggling I realized that our corporate proxy is an NTLM proxy (headbang) that doesn't play nincely with karaf. The workaround I found is to install a cntlm proxy (http://

Re: Servicemix 5 proxy problems

Hi ServiceMix 5 is based on Karaf 2.3.x and some things have changed. Please try to configure the proxy in maven settings.xml file. You can find here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9922467/how-to-setup-a-proxy-for-apache-karaf how to enable ServiceMix to use the proxy configuration from settin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >