Hi,
Am 26.08.12 00:18, schrieb Jeroen Dekkers:
At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200,
Are there problems with dovecot support for UIDPLUS or QRESYNC? I
can't find any documented issues.
UIDPLUS:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/FeatUIDPLUS
Timo Sirainen yesterday answered on my Question:
http://www.mail-
At Sat, 25 Aug 2012 20:43:50 +0200,
Martin Rabl wrote:
> Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support QRESYNC
> and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer" of SOGo?
> We have to use Cyrus, because dovecot seems not to suppor that in a
> proper way (polite spok
On 25/08/12 14:43, Martin Rabl wrote:
Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Server which does not support
QRESYNC and UIDPLUS, never will run together with the "Outlook-Layer"
of SOGo?
Correct.
--
Ludovic Marcotte
+1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.n
Hi,
Am 25.08.12 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You
only need Cyrus v2.4 if you plan to use it, because of the requirements
on the QRESYNC extension which is not found in v2.3 and below.
Hm - does that mean, that an IMAP-Serve
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
so, will this be provided as well?
You most likely read that in
Am 25.08.2012 13:20, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
> On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
>> I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
>> I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
>> so, will this be provided as well?
> You most likely re
On 25/08/12 04:07, Martin (Lists) wrote:
I read somewhere that with 2.0 I need a newer version of cyrus imap than
I use today (default 2.3.7 revision of centos 5.x). Is this true and if
so, will this be provided as well?
You most likely read that in the native Outlook compatibility guide. You
on
Am 24.08.2012 23:26, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
> On 24/08/12 17:20, Donny Brooks wrote:
>> Awesome. the way I read it before was that was the only way to
>> configure it. But then again I guess that was the appeal of it so that
>> was why everyone was doing that. How would we go from the 1.3.18 to
