[SOGo] BTS activities for Saturday, March 02 2019

2019-03-02 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Saturday, March 02 2019 BTS Activities Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs Project: SOGo For the period covering: Saturday, March 02 2019 idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary

Re: [SOGo] Performance tuning

2019-03-02 Thread Lorenz Pressler
> Try using http://www.imapproxy.org/ in between SOGo and your IMAP server. I would have thought this would just have the same effect as "NGImap4DisableIMAP4Pooling = NO;" however response times are worse (>1.5s). When I additionally enable pooling then the response time is about the same as u

Re: [SOGo] Performance tuning

2019-03-02 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2019-03-01 4:12 a.m., Lorenz Pressler (lor...@pressler.pro) wrote: Viewing a mail in the SOGo webmail interface however takes > 1s which makes it bothersome to use (from the click on the message in the message list to viewing the mail content in the message pane). I enabled a few debug opti

Re: [SOGo] Performance tuning

2019-03-02 Thread Lorenz Pressler
Hi Odhiamb, I tried setting it to 128M and I tried moving it to a unix socket. Both resulted in nothing noticable but I did not really expect anything on the cache side since everything else but accessing mail is reasonably fast. regards, -- Lorenz Pressler -- users@sogo.nu https://invers

Re: [SOGo] userPasswordAlgorithm

2019-03-02 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2019-03-02 11:31 a.m., Odhiambo Washington (odhia...@gmail.com) wrote: Is this something that can be avoided? By setting prependPasswordScheme = NO. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: https://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), P

[SOGo] userPasswordAlgorithm

2019-03-02 Thread Odhiambo Washington
I am able to change passwords, right, but I see that the password encryption scheme prepended to the encrypted password in the DB. Is this something that can be avoided? And why is digest-md5 not among the supported encryption algorithms? I don't see it listed in the Docu under "Possible values" w

Re: [SOGo] Performance tuning

2019-03-02 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi Lorenz, On 01.03.19 22:42, Lorenz Pressler (lor...@pressler.pro) wrote: yes, this made indeed a difference; it's about ~20-30% faster. response time taken from the debug log is now ~500-1200ms. as expected, I would say. ;-) Thank you for testing and your feedback. I am not sure why though