Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-28 Thread "Luca Olivetti"
On dilluns 28 marc 2016 03:40 CEST, "Patrice Levesque" (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote: > I guess most mailing lists will proceed as Sympa does, by adding a > “X-Original-From” header. It wouldn't be *that* hard for MUA to adjust > to this, and still offer users the possibility to

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-28 Thread DJ Lucas
On 03/24/2016 03:19 PM, Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote: Hi, You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM and DMARC. In order to comply with those mechanisms, this mailing list is now replacing the “From:” header with its

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-27 Thread Patrice Levesque
>> You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM >> and DMARC. > Yes and they are broken by design because they cause problems for > mailing lists and they do not test whether a message is spam. No silver bullet exists AFAIK that deals with all e-mail problems. At least,

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-27 Thread "Chris"
DJ Lucas wrote: > > > I haven't found anything from Google directly, but here... > > https://dmarc.org/2015/10/global-mailbox-providers-deploying-dmarc-to-protect-users/ Thank you. If I got this right, @gmail.com mails have to be signed and can't be faked by someone else. For the moment I'm not

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-27 Thread DJ Lucas
On 03/27/2016 11:48 AM, "Chris" (chris2...@postbox.xyz) wrote: Francis, Francis Lachapelle wrote: Yahoo has already adopted a strict DMARC policy and Google has announced to do the same in June 2016. We chose to *not* penalize our list subscribers hosting their mailbox on those systems.

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-27 Thread "Chris"
Francis, Francis Lachapelle wrote: > Yahoo has already adopted a strict DMARC policy and Google has announced > to do the same in June 2016. We chose to *not* penalize our list > subscribers hosting their mailbox on those systems. that's interesting. Do you have a reference to the new Google

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-26 Thread Francis Lachapelle
> On Mar 26, 2016, at 2:39 PM, MJ Ray (m...@phonecoop.coop) > wrote: > > Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote: >> You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM >> and DMARC. > > Yes and they are broken by design because they cause

Re: [SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-26 Thread MJ Ray
Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote: > You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM > and DMARC. Yes and they are broken by design because they cause problems for mailing lists and they do not test whether a message is spam. > In order to

[SOGo] META: Mailing list configuration change

2016-03-24 Thread Patrice Levesque
Hi, You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM and DMARC. In order to comply with those mechanisms, this mailing list is now replacing the “From:” header with its own address; you may have noticed the change earlier today.