On dilluns 28 marc 2016 03:40 CEST, "Patrice Levesque" (pleves...@inverse.ca)
wrote:
> I guess most mailing lists will proceed as Sympa does, by adding a
> “X-Original-From” header. It wouldn't be *that* hard for MUA to adjust
> to this, and still offer users the possibility to
On 03/24/2016 03:19 PM, Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote:
Hi,
You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM
and DMARC.
In order to comply with those mechanisms, this mailing list is now
replacing the “From:” header with its
>> You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM
>> and DMARC.
> Yes and they are broken by design because they cause problems for
> mailing lists and they do not test whether a message is spam.
No silver bullet exists AFAIK that deals with all e-mail problems. At
least,
DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>
> I haven't found anything from Google directly, but here...
>
> https://dmarc.org/2015/10/global-mailbox-providers-deploying-dmarc-to-protect-users/
Thank you. If I got this right, @gmail.com mails have to be signed and
can't be faked by someone else. For the moment I'm not
On 03/27/2016 11:48 AM, "Chris" (chris2...@postbox.xyz) wrote:
Francis,
Francis Lachapelle wrote:
Yahoo has already adopted a strict DMARC policy and Google has announced
to do the same in June 2016. We chose to *not* penalize our list
subscribers hosting their mailbox on those systems.
Francis,
Francis Lachapelle wrote:
> Yahoo has already adopted a strict DMARC policy and Google has announced
> to do the same in June 2016. We chose to *not* penalize our list
> subscribers hosting their mailbox on those systems.
that's interesting. Do you have a reference to the new Google
> On Mar 26, 2016, at 2:39 PM, MJ Ray (m...@phonecoop.coop)
> wrote:
>
> Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote:
>> You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM
>> and DMARC.
>
> Yes and they are broken by design because they cause
Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote:
> You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM
> and DMARC.
Yes and they are broken by design because they cause problems for
mailing lists and they do not test whether a message is spam.
> In order to
Hi,
You may be aware of modern spam protection mechanisms like SPF, DKIM
and DMARC.
In order to comply with those mechanisms, this mailing list is now
replacing the “From:” header with its own address; you may have
noticed the change earlier today.