date:20160523

[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, May 23 2016

2016-05-23 Thread SOGo reporter

Title: BTS activities for Monday, May 23 2016





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Monday, May 23 2016

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
3689
	2016-05-23 21:28:14
	updated (open)
	Apple iPhone OS
	Incorrect Web Layout
	
	  
	
211
	2016-05-23 11:37:43
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	SOGoAppointmentSendEMailNotifications = NO does not send notifications to extrnal users
	
	  
	
3687
	2016-05-23 11:04:55
	updated (open)
	GUI
	Catalan language not working.
	
	  
	
3165
	2016-05-23 10:43:47
	updated (open)
	Web Calendar
	event invitation: no notification for external invitees if appointment notifications are disabled
	
	  
	
3600
	2016-05-23 04:42:06
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	Disable Gravatar
	
	  
	
3688
	2016-05-23 16:55:18
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	INBOX ERROR: The message you have selected doesn't exist anymore.
	
	  
	
  
  


-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] can't accept appointment invitation to mail-alias over SOGo mail modul

2016-05-23 Thread Thomas Winterstein


Hei everyone,

Is it possible to accept an appointment invitation through SOGo mail 
modul although the mail address of the invitee is neither on the 
attendee list nor in my user sources?


Ldap user sources:

ldapsearch -x -LLL -H ldaps://ldap -b ou=users,dc=augsburg,dc=de 
uid=thomas mail

dn: uid=thomas,ou=users,dc=augsburg,dc=de
mail: thomas.winterst...@.rz.uni-augsburg.de

The invitation goes to 'postmas...@uni-augsburg.de' which is a 
mail-alias for 'thomas.winterst...@rz.uni-augsburg.de'. The SOGo mail 
modul shows the event invitation mail with appointment but there are no 
options to process it. Also I don't want to add the mail-alias to my 
user sources.


regards
--
Thomas Winterstein ... http://www.rz.uni-augsburg.de/zebra
Universität Augsburg, Rechenzentrum . Tel. (0821) 598-2068
86135 Augsburg .. Fax. (0821) 598-2010
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re[4]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

2016-05-23 Thread "Qmail"

It looks like this:
 1
 oc10_testdomain_lan_28ae_1cf350a8_0
  20
   mail%2F1f0a2428afd7ca538ec4a63ae627
   0
   INBOX
   2
Is there something special about this account ? How come others work just fine ?

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:24 PM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
OK, then have a close look into the FolderSync response. Check whether ParentId 
is either 0 or point to a valid ServerId.
You can send me an extract from your sogo.log and I'll have a look.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 17:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net))  schrieb:

There are no such requests. Only . I removed the user entirely using sogo-tool 
remove and from Outlook.
I then re-added the account to Outlook and it added just fine - came up right 
away with 'All folders are up to date'
In sogo logs, the only post Outlook does is:

May 23 10:52:22 sogod [10414]: |SOGo| starting method 'POST' on uri 
'/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com 
(mailto:b...@testdomain.com)=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15'
May 23 10:52:24 sogod [10414]: 195.24.238.40 "POST 
/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com 
(mailto:b...@testdomain.com)=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15
 HTTP/1.1" 200 1417/13 1.380 - - 1M
It replies with a long response for:
Other devices/Outlook also send Cmd=Sync, but not on this account.
Even if I hit Send / Receive, all I see is the above: Cmd=FolderSync
Thanks
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:54 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Hi!

is not meaningful here, it will only find data on new profiles or if there are 
changes to the folder hierarchy.

Search for   requests and their responses when you recreate the account or 
after you used sogo-tool manage-eas resetfolder.

Regards,
Thomas

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 21:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)))  wrote:

Well,
we ran more tests and here's the EAS response for Outlook 2013:
May 22 14:54:52 sogod [8860]:  EAS - response for device 
5E79CCA89F054884A128928537618624:
1
oc10_testsever_lan_1009_1cef97c8_0
0
However, I think the issue is related to the number of messages in the user's 
Inbox. For example, when attempting to view the Inbox in SOGO webmail, it takes 
a solid 8-9 minutes to display it. Debugging that behavior, shows this IMAP 
command to be responsible for this delay:
UID SORT (REVERSE DATE) UTF-8 NOT DELETED
The user has about 70 000 messages in his Inbox and I'm assuming that takes a 
while. SOGO webmail keeps spinning while that command completes and eventually 
displays the messages.
EAS, from what I see just displays data it finds in SQL but it returns empty so 
that's why it shows 'Folders are up to date' right away.
Is this a bug ? Shouldn't EAS hold while the Inbox gets sorted ?
On a related note, wouldn't it be faster to not have the IMAP server sort the 
messages but rather pull them all and sort them in the application ?
Thank you
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Recreate the profile in outlook  with SOGoEASDebugEnabled = YES and look into 
sogo.log to see what sogo send to the Client.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 21:49 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net  schrieb:

We have a user with 70 000 messages in his Inbox that fails to sync via 
ActiveSync and Outlook 2013.
There are no errors anywhere, Outlook shows: All folders are up to date but no 
data gets sent over. There are also no errors in the logs.
The EAS related settings are:
WOWorkersCount = 120;
SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 3540;
SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 3540;
SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 60;
SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 512;
SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize= 4096;
WOWatchDogRequestTimeout=60;
SxVMemLimit = 6100;
Any ideas ?

Thank you
--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu)) (mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)))

--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu)) (mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re[4]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

2016-05-23 Thread "Qmail"

I've setup another account via Outlook and the FolderSync looks similar, except 
in this case it somehow proceeds to do a Sync call after
   mail%2F13efb72de65877550f7dc72b6ff5
   0
   INBOX
   2
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:24 PM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
OK, then have a close look into the FolderSync response. Check whether ParentId 
is either 0 or point to a valid ServerId.
You can send me an extract from your sogo.log and I'll have a look.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 17:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net))  schrieb:

There are no such requests. Only . I removed the user entirely using sogo-tool 
remove and from Outlook.
I then re-added the account to Outlook and it added just fine - came up right 
away with 'All folders are up to date'
In sogo logs, the only post Outlook does is:

May 23 10:52:22 sogod [10414]: |SOGo| starting method 'POST' on uri 
'/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com 
(mailto:b...@testdomain.com)=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15'
May 23 10:52:24 sogod [10414]: 195.24.238.40 "POST 
/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com 
(mailto:b...@testdomain.com)=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15
 HTTP/1.1" 200 1417/13 1.380 - - 1M
It replies with a long response for:
Other devices/Outlook also send Cmd=Sync, but not on this account.
Even if I hit Send / Receive, all I see is the above: Cmd=FolderSync
Thanks
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:54 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Hi!

is not meaningful here, it will only find data on new profiles or if there are 
changes to the folder hierarchy.

Search for   requests and their responses when you recreate the account or 
after you used sogo-tool manage-eas resetfolder.

Regards,
Thomas

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 21:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)))  wrote:

Well,
we ran more tests and here's the EAS response for Outlook 2013:
May 22 14:54:52 sogod [8860]:  EAS - response for device 
5E79CCA89F054884A128928537618624:
1
oc10_testsever_lan_1009_1cef97c8_0
0
However, I think the issue is related to the number of messages in the user's 
Inbox. For example, when attempting to view the Inbox in SOGO webmail, it takes 
a solid 8-9 minutes to display it. Debugging that behavior, shows this IMAP 
command to be responsible for this delay:
UID SORT (REVERSE DATE) UTF-8 NOT DELETED
The user has about 70 000 messages in his Inbox and I'm assuming that takes a 
while. SOGO webmail keeps spinning while that command completes and eventually 
displays the messages.
EAS, from what I see just displays data it finds in SQL but it returns empty so 
that's why it shows 'Folders are up to date' right away.
Is this a bug ? Shouldn't EAS hold while the Inbox gets sorted ?
On a related note, wouldn't it be faster to not have the IMAP server sort the 
messages but rather pull them all and sort them in the application ?
Thank you
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Recreate the profile in outlook  with SOGoEASDebugEnabled = YES and look into 
sogo.log to see what sogo send to the Client.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 21:49 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net  schrieb:

We have a user with 70 000 messages in his Inbox that fails to sync via 
ActiveSync and Outlook 2013.
There are no errors anywhere, Outlook shows: All folders are up to date but no 
data gets sent over. There are also no errors in the logs.
The EAS related settings are:
WOWorkersCount = 120;
SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 3540;
SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 3540;
SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 60;
SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 512;
SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize= 4096;
WOWatchDogRequestTimeout=60;
SxVMemLimit = 6100;
Any ideas ?

Thank you
--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu)) (mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)))

--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu)) (mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

2016-05-23 Thread "Laz C. Peterson"

Wonderful.  Questions answered.

Thank you all for your time and help.

SOGo 3.1 … (With a 2.3 tailback!) … Here we go!

~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
Ph: 951.319.3240 x201

> On May 23, 2016, at 9:17 AM, Christian Mack (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> Am 23.05.2016 um 16:00 schrieb "Laz C. Peterson" (l...@paravis.net):
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> We are looking to upgrade, and I am curious to know if it is possible to run 
>> both 2.3 and 3.1 at the same time (testing, etc.)?
>> 
> 
> Yes this is possible.
> You have to install 3.x on another server than 2.x and use the same DB.
> 
> Beware:
> The database location is stored in the DB itself.
> Therefore if you used "localhost", this will not work from the second
> machine.
> If you used an DNS Alias (e.g. defined in /etc/hosts)
> 
>> I would imagine I need to run the database schema update to 3.0.0 (via 
>> sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined-mysql.sh),
> 
> No, not at all.
> That script is only needed, if you want to change to the new db schema
> with only a few tables for all users, instead of 6 tables per user.
> Then you have to change the SOGo configuration too.
> 
>> but will this make any changes to the database that would be incompatible 
>> with 2.3? 
> 
> Yes, 2.3 is not capable of using the new schema (yet?).
> 
>> And also, does 3.1 store data any differently in any existing tables that 
>> would cause a problem?
>> 
> 
> If you keep the existing db schema, it will work without problems.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Christian Mack
> 
> -- 
> Christian Mack
> Universität Konstanz
> Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
> Abteilung Basisdienste
> 78457 Konstanz
> +49 7531 88-4416
> 

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re[3]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

2016-05-23 Thread Thomas (aon) Fuehrer

OK, then have a close look into the FolderSync response. Check whether ParentId 
is either 0 or point to a valid ServerId.
You can send me an extract from your sogo.log and I'll have a look.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 17:12 CEST, "\"Qmail\"" (qm...@top-consulting.net) 
 schrieb:

> There are no such requests. Only . I removed the user entirely using 
> sogo-tool remove and from Outlook.
> I then re-added the account to Outlook and it added just fine - came up right 
> away with 'All folders are up to date'
> In sogo logs, the only post Outlook does is:
>
> May 23 10:52:22 sogod [10414]: |SOGo| starting method 'POST' on uri 
> '/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15'
> May 23 10:52:24 sogod [10414]: 195.24.238.40 "POST 
> /SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15
>  HTTP/1.1" 200 1417/13 1.380 - - 1M
> It replies with a long response for:
> Other devices/Outlook also send Cmd=Sync, but not on this account.
> Even if I hit Send / Receive, all I see is the above: Cmd=FolderSync
> Thanks
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:54 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
> Hi!
>
>  is not meaningful here, it will only find data on new profiles or if there 
> are changes to the folder hierarchy.
>
> Search for   requests and their responses when you recreate the account or 
> after you used sogo-tool manage-eas resetfolder.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> On Sunday, May 22, 2016 21:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
> (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net))  wrote:
>
> Well,
> we ran more tests and here's the EAS response for Outlook 2013:
> May 22 14:54:52 sogod [8860]:  EAS - response for device 
> 5E79CCA89F054884A128928537618624:
> 1
> oc10_testsever_lan_1009_1cef97c8_0
> 0
> However, I think the issue is related to the number of messages in the user's 
> Inbox. For example, when attempting to view the Inbox in SOGO webmail, it 
> takes a solid 8-9 minutes to display it. Debugging that behavior, shows this 
> IMAP command to be responsible for this delay:
> UID SORT (REVERSE DATE) UTF-8 NOT DELETED
> The user has about 70 000 messages in his Inbox and I'm assuming that takes a 
> while. SOGO webmail keeps spinning while that command completes and 
> eventually displays the messages.
> EAS, from what I see just displays data it finds in SQL but it returns empty 
> so that's why it shows 'Folders are up to date' right away.
> Is this a bug ? Shouldn't EAS hold while the Inbox gets sorted ?
> On a related note, wouldn't it be faster to not have the IMAP server sort the 
> messages but rather pull them all and sort them in the application ?
> Thank you
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
> Recreate the profile in outlook  with SOGoEASDebugEnabled = YES and look into 
> sogo.log to see what sogo send to the Client.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 21:49 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
> (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
> (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)))  schrieb:
>
> We have a user with 70 000 messages in his Inbox that fails to sync via 
> ActiveSync and Outlook 2013.
> There are no errors anywhere, Outlook shows: All folders are up to date but 
> no data gets sent over. There are also no errors in the logs.
> The EAS related settings are:
> WOWorkersCount = 120;
> SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 3540;
> SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 3540;
> SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 60;
> SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 512;
> SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize= 4096;
> WOWatchDogRequestTimeout=60;
> SxVMemLimit = 6100;
> Any ideas ?
>
> Thank you
> --
> users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
> (mailto:users@sogo.nu))
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
> (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists))
>
> --
> users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
> (mailto:users@sogo.nu))
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
> (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists))
> --
> users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)
>
> --
> users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)
> --
> users@sogo.nu
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists




-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

2016-05-23 Thread Christian Mack

Hello

Am 23.05.2016 um 16:00 schrieb "Laz C. Peterson" (l...@paravis.net):
> Hi there,
> 
> We are looking to upgrade, and I am curious to know if it is possible to run 
> both 2.3 and 3.1 at the same time (testing, etc.)?
> 

Yes this is possible.
You have to install 3.x on another server than 2.x and use the same DB.

Beware:
The database location is stored in the DB itself.
Therefore if you used "localhost", this will not work from the second
machine.
If you used an DNS Alias (e.g. defined in /etc/hosts)

> I would imagine I need to run the database schema update to 3.0.0 (via 
> sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined-mysql.sh),

No, not at all.
That script is only needed, if you want to change to the new db schema
with only a few tables for all users, instead of 6 tables per user.
Then you have to change the SOGo configuration too.

> but will this make any changes to the database that would be incompatible 
> with 2.3? 

Yes, 2.3 is not capable of using the new schema (yet?).

> And also, does 3.1 store data any differently in any existing tables that 
> would cause a problem?
> 

If you keep the existing db schema, it will work without problems.


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

2016-05-23 Thread an...@schild.ws


Am 23.05.2016 um 16:00 schrieb "Laz C. Peterson" (l...@paravis.net):

Hi there,

We are looking to upgrade, and I am curious to know if it is possible 
to run both 2.3 and 3.1 at the same time (testing, etc.)?


Yes, but not on the same system.
They can use the same DB, but not the same Webfrontend.

Look at the mailing list archive for such setups.



I would imagine I need to run the database schema update to 3.0.0 (via 
sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined-mysql.sh), but will this
No, you don't need to run this script, it's optional (and will break 2.x 
compatibility)


André
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re[3]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

2016-05-23 Thread "Qmail"

There are no such requests. Only . I removed the user entirely using sogo-tool 
remove and from Outlook.
I then re-added the account to Outlook and it added just fine - came up right 
away with 'All folders are up to date'
In sogo logs, the only post Outlook does is:

May 23 10:52:22 sogod [10414]: |SOGo| starting method 'POST' on uri 
'/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15'
May 23 10:52:24 sogod [10414]: 195.24.238.40 "POST 
/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?Cmd=FolderSync=b...@testdomain.com=F61F834D9A4B441DAF76A478712AEE71=WindowsOutlook15
 HTTP/1.1" 200 1417/13 1.380 - - 1M
It replies with a long response for:
Other devices/Outlook also send Cmd=Sync, but not on this account.
Even if I hit Send / Receive, all I see is the above: Cmd=FolderSync
Thanks
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:54 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Hi!

 is not meaningful here, it will only find data on new profiles or if there are 
changes to the folder hierarchy.

Search for   requests and their responses when you recreate the account or 
after you used sogo-tool manage-eas resetfolder.

Regards,
Thomas

On Sunday, May 22, 2016 21:12 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net))  wrote:

Well,
we ran more tests and here's the EAS response for Outlook 2013:
May 22 14:54:52 sogod [8860]:  EAS - response for device 
5E79CCA89F054884A128928537618624:
1
oc10_testsever_lan_1009_1cef97c8_0
0
However, I think the issue is related to the number of messages in the user's 
Inbox. For example, when attempting to view the Inbox in SOGO webmail, it takes 
a solid 8-9 minutes to display it. Debugging that behavior, shows this IMAP 
command to be responsible for this delay:
UID SORT (REVERSE DATE) UTF-8 NOT DELETED
The user has about 70 000 messages in his Inbox and I'm assuming that takes a 
while. SOGO webmail keeps spinning while that command completes and eventually 
displays the messages.
EAS, from what I see just displays data it finds in SQL but it returns empty so 
that's why it shows 'Folders are up to date' right away.
Is this a bug ? Shouldn't EAS hold while the Inbox gets sorted ?
On a related note, wouldn't it be faster to not have the IMAP server sort the 
messages but rather pull them all and sort them in the application ?
Thank you
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:23 AM, Thomas (aon) Fuehrer  wrote:
Recreate the profile in outlook  with SOGoEASDebugEnabled = YES and look into 
sogo.log to see what sogo send to the Client.

Regards,
Thomas

Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2016 21:49 CEST, ""Qmail"" (qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net) (mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net 
(mailto:qm...@top-consulting.net)))  schrieb:

We have a user with 70 000 messages in his Inbox that fails to sync via 
ActiveSync and Outlook 2013.
There are no errors anywhere, Outlook shows: All folders are up to date but no 
data gets sent over. There are also no errors in the logs.
The EAS related settings are:
WOWorkersCount = 120;
SOGoMaximumPingInterval = 3540;
SOGoMaximumSyncInterval = 3540;
SOGoInternalSyncInterval = 60;
SOGoMaximumSyncWindowSize = 512;
SOGoMaximumSyncResponseSize= 4096;
WOWatchDogRequestTimeout=60;
SxVMemLimit = 6100;
Any ideas ?

Thank you
--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists))

--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu) (mailto:users@sogo.nu 
(mailto:users@sogo.nu))
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists) 
(https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists))
--
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)

-- 
users@sogo.nu (mailto:users@sogo.nu)
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists (https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists)
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] LDAP address book not visible

2016-05-23 Thread "Roman Smid"

Hello,
I'm trying to add a LDAP global address book to my SoGo 3.1 installation on
Ubuntu server, but with no luck. I want to use it only as an address book,
not for authentication, which is done using MSQL and working well. I have
added

  SOGoUserSources = (
{
  type = ldap;
  CNFieldName = cn;
  UIDFieldName = uid;
  IDFieldName = uid; // first field of the DN for direct binds
  bindFields = (uid, cn); // array of fields to use for indirect binds
  baseDN = "ou=admini,dc=iba,dc=muni,dc=cz";
  bindDN = "cn=admin,dc=iba,dc=muni,dc=cz";
  bindPassword = "secret";
  canAuthenticate = NO;
  displayName = "Address book";
  hostname = ldap://127.0.0.1:389;
  id = adresar;
  isAddressBook = YES;
  scope = SUB;
  userPasswordAlgorithm = ssha;
}
  );

But this source does not show up in the Web UI at all  (no "Address book"
visible among Global Addressbooks).
I have enabled the LDAPDebugEnabled option, but nothing concerning LDAP
appears in the log. 
What am I doing wrong?
Thanx
Roman


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

2016-05-23 Thread "Laz C. Peterson"

Hi there,

We are looking to upgrade, and I am curious to know if it is possible to run 
both 2.3 and 3.1 at the same time (testing, etc.)?

I would imagine I need to run the database schema update to 3.0.0 (via 
sql-update-3.0.0-to-combined-mysql.sh), but will this make any changes to the 
database that would be incompatible with 2.3?  And also, does 3.1 store data 
any differently in any existing tables that would cause a problem?

Thank you!

~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] OpenChange and multiple domains

2016-05-23 Thread "Laz C. Peterson"

Hello,

I’ve been looking at OpenChange to configure native Outlook functionality, but 
have been hesitant for quite a while, since we have multiple active directory 
domains that SOGo is authenticating from.  Has anyone had any experience with 
multiple domains and OpenChange/SOGo?

SOGo itself works great with the multiple domains … But it seems OpenChange is 
not so friendly, requiring the server itself to be joined to the AD as a domain 
controller — I really don’t want to have to create a new OpenChange host for 
each domain.

Any help or information would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you!

~ Laz Peterson
Paravis, LLC
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] What is better for battery on mobile devices?

2016-05-23 Thread Adrian Figueroa


Hello,

ActiveSync works great for battery life in my experience. Especially, if 
the connection to the device is kept open for a long time without 
reconnection (24 hours for example).


Adrian

Am 23.05.2016 um 10:27 schrieb Christian Rößner 
(c...@roessner-network-solutions.com):

Hi,

I currently run SOGo-3.1.0 with Apple devices (Macs, iPhones and iPads). I also 
use Dovecot for IMAP. Currently I use directly CalDAV/CardDAV and IMAP with a 
poll interval of 30 minutes. I have seen that I also could use ActiveSync. But 
as I understood, this keeps a connection open (until a timeout of 6 minutes I 
guess).

What is the preferred solution for iOS devices? Does ActiveSync have a negative 
impact for the battery?

Thanks

Christian
—
Christian Rößner B.Sc.
Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Alsfeld
T: +49 6631 78823400, F: +49 6631 78823409, M: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[SOGo] What is better for battery on mobile devices?

2016-05-23 Thread c...@roessner-network-solutions.com

Hi,

I currently run SOGo-3.1.0 with Apple devices (Macs, iPhones and iPads). I also 
use Dovecot for IMAP. Currently I use directly CalDAV/CardDAV and IMAP with a 
poll interval of 30 minutes. I have seen that I also could use ActiveSync. But 
as I understood, this keeps a connection open (until a timeout of 6 minutes I 
guess).

What is the preferred solution for iOS devices? Does ActiveSync have a negative 
impact for the battery?

Thanks

Christian
—
Christian Rößner B.Sc.
Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Alsfeld
T: +49 6631 78823400, F: +49 6631 78823409, M: +49 171 9905345
USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, http://www.roessner-network-solutions.com



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[SOGo] Short drag accidentally deletes calendar entry

2016-05-23 Thread Carsten Woltmann

Just stumbled across a potentially annoying bug:

Situation: Calendar view with at least one calendar entry being
displayed. Short drag/drop (like 1mm to the right) of the item (quickly,
without waiting for the frontend to realize what's going on) makes the
item pop up it's description. From here, there is nothing (not even
edit->save) that can prevent the item from being deleted the moment the
dialog is closed.

Especially in environments with a laggy webinterface this can become
very annoying!

Best, Bb

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] BTS activities for Monday, May 23 2016

[SOGo] can't accept appointment invitation to mail-alias over SOGo mail modul

Re[4]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

Re[4]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

Re[3]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

Re: [SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

Re[3]: [SOGo] Large Inbox issues with Sogo 3.1 and EAS

[SOGo] LDAP address book not visible

[SOGo] Upgrading 2.3->3.1

[SOGo] OpenChange and multiple domains

Re: [SOGo] What is better for battery on mobile devices?

[SOGo] What is better for battery on mobile devices?

[SOGo] Short drag accidentally deletes calendar entry

15 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information