[SOGo] proxy error

2012-09-08 Thread Imo Graf
Hello,

sometimes after a lontime sogo crashed. I get the proxy error when I try to 
login into SOGo. 

This is the log when I try to login: 

2012-09-08 09:30:47.053 sogod[23248] Note: Using UTF-8 as URL encoding in 
NGExtensions.
2012-09-08 09:30:47.069 sogod[23248] WOCompoundElement: pool embedding is on.
2012-09-08 09:30:47.069 sogod[23248] WOCompoundElement: id logging is on.
2012-09-08 09:30:47.115 sogod[23248] WARNING: IMAP4 connection pooling is 
disabled!
2012-09-08 09:30:47.122 sogod[23248] Note(NGImap4Connection): using '.' as the 
IMAP4 folder separator.
2012-09-08 09:30:47.472 sogod[23248] Note: using 'UCS-2LE' on Linux.
Sep 08 09:30:47 sogod [1122]: 0x0x85a311c[WOWatchDogChild] child 23248 exited
Sep 08 09:30:48 sogod [1122]: 0x0x85a311c[WOWatchDogChild]  (terminated due 
to signal 11)
Sep 08 09:30:48 sogod [1122]: 0x0x86a213c[WOWatchDog] child spawned with pid 
23253

When I restart SOGo then SOGo works again. Can someone help me to solve this 
problem? Since version 1.13 I never had this problem only at version 1.16 
(current installed version)

Best regards.

Imo-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] SOGo v2 architecture

2012-09-08 Thread CF Studelec
Thank you Francis, this document is a must have.


Le 07/09/2012 23:52, Francis Lachapelle a écrit :
 Hi SOGo fellows

 I've made a diagram of the components surrounding the Outlook compatibility 
 layer of the upcoming 2.0 release. It's on the website and the Native 
 Microsoft Outlook Configuration guide.

 Hopefully it will help anyone to better understand the integration of Samba 4 
 and OpenChange into the new Outlook compatibility feature.

 http://www.sogo.nu/english/about/overview.html
 http://www.sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGo%20Native%20Microsoft%20Outlook%20Configuration.pdf

 Francis

 --
 flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca
 Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
 (http://packetfence.org)


-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


[SOGo] Sogo 2.x on virtual server

2012-09-08 Thread Holger Biber

Hi,

I'm evaluating SOGo 2.0 for our business school (80 teachers, 2000 
students) and I want to use

the native M$-Outlook compatibility.
My system is a vServer (virtual Server) with 8GB RAM, 100 GB HDD and 
CentOS 5.

As I read in the installation manual I have to setup Samba with ACL.
But this is the problem. In the virtual server I couldn't set ACL, 
because there is just one

partition/filesystem ( /dev/vzfs on / type vzfs (rw,relatime) ).

So is it impossible to setup SOGo 2.x on a virtual Server? Or just this one?
I've searched at several webhoster here in Germany (hosteurope.de, 
1und1.de, ...) and all

have root-servers on virtual hardware.

Thanks for any information, or perhaps tips to use SOGo with native 
M$-O. on this machine.


Bye and best regards
Holger
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] SOGo v2 architecture

2012-09-08 Thread Michael Gratton
On 09/09/12 00:05, CF Studelec wrote:
 Thank you Francis, this document is a must have.
 

Along these lines, is there documentation on the web site of what
improvements 2.0 has beyond 1.3 (aside from OpenChange/Outlook
integration)? I have looked, but not found anything.

I am about to commission a new machine running SOGo and need to decide
if the pain of deploying a RC candidate of 2.0 is going to be worth
while, or commit to continue using 1.3 on it for the next four years.

Thanks,
//Mike

-- 
Michael Gratton mich...@quuxo.com
Quuxo Software http://web.quuxo.com/



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [SOGo] SOGo v2 architecture

2012-09-08 Thread Jean Raby

On 12-09-08 11:32 AM, Michael Gratton wrote:

On 09/09/12 00:05, CF Studelec wrote:

Thank you Francis, this document is a must have.



Along these lines, is there documentation on the web site of what
improvements 2.0 has beyond 1.3 (aside from OpenChange/Outlook
integration)? I have looked, but not found anything.
There's a good reason for that, the only difference between 1.3.x and 
2.0 is the OpenChange backend ;-)



I am about to commission a new machine running SOGo and need to decide
if the pain of deploying a RC candidate of 2.0 is going to be worth
while, or commit to continue using 1.3 on it for the next four years.

If you don't need outlook compatibility, stick to 1.3 until 2.0 is 
released, then upgrade as usual without installing the openchange stuff.


--
Jean Raby
jr...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x120) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists