[SOGo] BTS activities for Friday, April 19 2013

2013-04-19 Thread SOGo reporter
Title: BTS activities for Friday, April 19 2013





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Friday, April 19 2013

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
2298
	2013-04-19 09:48:45
	new (open)
	Backend Calendar
	HTTP Error 404 when uploading ICS files using CalDAV containing 'folded' / split-up UTF-8 characters
	
	  
	
2297
	2013-04-19 08:53:30
	new (open)
	OpenChange backend
	Entire day events
	
	  
	
2292
	2013-04-19 13:03:48
	updated (open)
	Web Calendar
	Problem with Cyrillic characters in the calendar
	
	  
	
  
  




Re: [SOGo] Batch manipulation of contacts – best way?

2013-04-19 Thread André Schild

I think via CardDav is "the best"(tm) way to do it.

Of course there exist CardDav libraries, but it depends on the
programming language and system you wish it to run...
Google is your friend ;)


André

Am 19.04.2013 17:19, schrieb Sven Schwedas:

Bump? Anyone?

On 17.04.2013 10:59, Sven Schwedas wrote:

Hi,

We need to run some operations on all address books (sanitizing
telephone numbers, checking for duplicates, etc.). What's the best way
to do that? Changing the database directly seems not to be a good idea.
Is there a SOGo API I could use? CardDAV libraries?



--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


Re: [SOGo] Batch manipulation of contacts – best way?

2013-04-19 Thread Sven Schwedas
Bump? Anyone?

On 17.04.2013 10:59, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We need to run some operations on all address books (sanitizing
> telephone numbers, checking for duplicates, etc.). What's the best way
> to do that? Changing the database directly seems not to be a good idea.
> Is there a SOGo API I could use? CardDAV libraries?
> 

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, / Best Regards,
Sven SCHWEDAS
Systemadministrator
TAO Beratungs- und Management GmbH | Lendplatz 45 | A - 8020 Graz
Mail/XMPP: sven.schwe...@tao.at | +43 (0)680 301 7167
http://software.tao.at



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [SOGo] Php-push2 - Active Sync

2013-04-19 Thread Fabio Onorini
ZPUSH base on 3 combined backends:
- Imap - supplied by tour imap server dovecot/cyrus
- Calddav - supplied by sogo
- CardDAV - supplied by sogo

My suggestion is to change log level to DEBUG to know where is
authentication problem.


2013/4/18 Andy Tuinman 

> Can someone pls send me a copy of their www folder of php-push2 or maybe
> the config files?
> Op 18 apr. 2013 16:40 schreef "Martin Rabl"  het
> volgende:
>
>> Am 18.04.2013 16:07, schrieb Andy Tuinman:
>> > Ok but doen't php-push2 needs to authenticate
>> > against samba4 i never
>> > told php-push to authenticate and my logins are
>> > incorrect if i enter them in php-push2
>>
>> Php-push2 authenticates against SOGo.
>> SOGo IMHO can authenticate against Samba4, if you use their built in
>> AD/LDAP server.
>>
>> --
>> Greetings,
>>
>>Martin Rabl
>> --
>> users@sogo.nu
>> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
>>
>


-- 
---
Fabio Onorini
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Entire day events

2013-04-19 Thread Fabio Onorini
Hello sogo users,
I have wrong behavior on Entire day events.

All my devices is configurated with same timezone.

If I create a all day appointment on outlook and sync with server, on sogo
webmail I see event one day before.

If I create a all day appointment on sogo webmail, on outlook I see event
correctly.

VCal of event in database is wrong (by outlook).
An event created at 19th April 2013 (today) have fields:
DTSTART:20130418
DTEND:20130419


http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2297

-- 
---
Fabio Onorini
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Lightning using the last email, again!

2013-04-19 Thread Igor Vitorac
According to the CalDAV standard, is server supposed to send all emails 
or just primary?
I am trying to figure out where the problem resides. SOGo side or 
Lightning side?


Thanks,
Igor



Igor Vitorac wrote, On 18/04/2013 16:22:
It seems that latest Lightning (1.9.1) has again problem with Invitee 
email address. Or could it be SOGo (2.0.4b)?
I can remember that there was such problem in previous Lightning 
versions.


- I have 2 emails defined in TB:
my_n...@example.be (this one is primary and defined as email in 
Calendar properties)

my_n...@example.com

- I have both email defined in SOGo SQL user source, so SOGo is aware 
of both.

- My SOGo is installed at sogo.example.com

- Email address defined in calendar properties in Lightning is 
my_n...@example.be


Problem:
- When I create event and I want to invite somebody, I can see that my 
address is displayed as my_n...@example.com (last email) in invitee list.
- When I receive email invitation from somebody else, Lightning will 
respond again with wrong email my_n...@example.com (last one)


New test:
- Then I removed my_n...@example.com (last email) from my profile in 
sogo user source, so only one has left my_n...@example.be. Cleared 
memcached; started TB/Lightning and Lightning was showing correctly 
email address (my_n...@example.be) !


So, seems that SOGo is sending both emails (my_n...@example.be and 
my_n...@example.com ) to Lightning and Lightning is using only the 
last one (for sending invitations and for responding to invitations).


These are very similar bugs that :
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539916
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540410
but seems that Lightning now displays always option to Accept/Decline 
invitation, however behavior with invitee email address is back again.


Does anybody have the similar scenario?

Thanks,
Igor




--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists