[SOGo] BTS activities for Wednesday, April 16 2014

[SOGo reporter]

Title: BTS activities for Wednesday, April 16 2014





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Wednesday, April 16 2014

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
1786
	2014-04-16 11:15:37
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Feature: new notification option for 'EMail Daily Agenda' at a user specified time
	
	  
	
2635
	2014-04-16 10:38:42
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Support for Event - especially the 'Daily Agenda' - notifications, like Google
	
	  
	
2707
	2014-04-16 10:39:31
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Wrong Time/timezone for accepted event showing in iPhone and Thunderbird, shows correct in SOGo web GUI
	
	  
	
2716
	2014-04-16 06:05:49
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Wrong time/timezone for Calendar Invite when accepted on iPhone, OK when accepted on Thunderbird
	
	  
	
2718
	2014-04-16 09:45:23
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Shared Calendars not automatically refreshed when events are added/updated/deleted
	
	  
	
2719
	2014-04-16 10:07:05
	updated (open)
	Backend Calendar
	Allow managing permissions on Subscribed Calendars when user has Full Control
	
	  
	
2594
	2014-04-16 11:41:14
	updated (open)
	Backend General
	Thunderbird and mail tags
	
	  
	
31
	2014-04-16 12:57:32
	updated (open)
	Backend Mail
	Support for SMTP SASL AUTH and SMTP TLS/SSL
	
	  
	
193
	2014-04-16 09:09:57
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	Priority ignored when editing draft message
	
	  
	
2720
	2014-04-16 11:18:42
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	show warning when closing a draft window
	
	  
	
2721
	2014-04-16 16:00:58
	updated (open)
	Web Mail
	Pictures defined as CSS background in emails are loaded and displayed, despite preference set to "Never"
	
	  
	
2633
	2014-04-16 10:39:16
	updated (open)
	with SOGo
	Allow Bug Reporters to edit Bug Details (Project, Category, Summary, etc) on bugs they have opened/reported
	
	  
	
2714
	2014-04-16 10:25:53
	updated (open)
	with SOGo
	Read-Only Shared Address Boooks - updates fail if user updates local copy
	
	  
	
2437
	2014-04-16 15:43:46
	resolved (fixed)
	Web Mail
	pictures in emails are loaded and displayed, despite preference set to "Never"
	
	  
	
  
  

Re: [SOGo] GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector

[Helge Hess]

On Apr 16, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Charles Marcus  wrote:
> On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč  wrote:
>> I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
>> source licensed projects.
> 
> You had said you were planning on eliminating the need for these eventually, 
> but not 'soon'...
> 
> Any idea how long it might take? I mean, are you thinking months? Or years?

Replacing Redemption would be a major effort. AFAIK Redemption is essentially a 
reimplementation of the model layer of Outlook on top of plain MAPI. I have a 
hard time to believe this could be done in a few months (and there is a reason 
why Redemption is popular ;-).
(coding Redemption is actually quite similar to making OpenChange work right, 
just that the work is done on the client side).

hh

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] group calendar for room reservation and booking

[František Kučera]

Dne 16.4.2014 13:56, Christian Mack napsal(a):
> http://wiki.sogo.nu/ResourceConfiguration

Little offtopic: There is BASH script for adding resources on that page
which can cause SQL injection.
In this particular case it might not be too dangerous if the script is
operated by a wise administrator.
But it is more safe to use some programming language which supports
parametrized queries or some tool like SQL-DK
 (my tool, free software)
Then you can write:

sql-dk
--db my_database
 --sql "
USE sogo;
INSERT INTO sogo_users
(c_uid, c_name, c_password, c_cn, mail, kind, multiple_bookings)
VALUES
(?, ?, md5(?), ?, ?, ?, ?);"
--data "$username" "$username" "$password" "$name" "$email"
"location" "1"

Franta
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

[Charles Marcus]

Hello,

Is it possible to adjust the web browser for SOGo such that:

For our webmail access, instead of: https://webmail.example.com/SOGo/

It can just be: https://webmail.example.com

Also, same question for the Card/CalDAV URLS...

Instead of: https://sogo.example.com/SOGo/dav/username

I'd like it to be something like: https://dav.example.com/username

Is this possible by adjusting the apache configs? If so, I'm far from an 
apache guru, so some specific suggestions would be happily accepted... ;)


--

Best regards,

Charles

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] what page I am with jquery?

[Fernando Figaroli]

I'm writing jquery code to customize the interface. 
How do I know what page am I? 
Calendar? email? new_email? 
Thank you.-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] group calendar for room reservation and booking

[Charles Marcus]

On 4/16/2014 3:49 AM, Orm Finnendahl  wrote:

Hi,

  for a room reservation and booking system at our school we're looking
for a group calendar with the following properties:

- Everybody in a group has the right to create entries

- Everybody in the group has read access to all entries

- Only the person who created an entry has the permission to
   edit/delete it (apart from the admin of course).

Is this possible in SOGo (or even the standard way)? Sorry, if I'm
asking something obvious, but I'm new to SOGo and couldn't find the
appropriate information in the docs. We're reluctant to set up a
server before making sure that it is actually possible.


Hi Orm,

We had a similar requirement, and after much fussing thinking it was 
going to be difficult, it turned out to be rather simple.


In our pre-existing Google Calendar setup (accessed via 
Thunderbird+Lightning+Provider for Google Calendar), we simply set the 
shared calendars (we have two that we need to work this way) in question 
(in your case, the 'group calendar') to auto-accept invites from the 
users it was shared with.


When I started asking about this over a year ago when we first started 
looking into SOGo, I was told that this would require configuring some 
'Resource User(s)' and some other special/complicated configuration.


Turns out this was not the case, it was actually trivially easy.

All you need to do is create a dedicated user for each calendar you want 
to work this way, rename that users personal calendar to the name you 
want to use, then share it the way you want (Group A has read-only 
access, Group B has full control, etc)...


Then, for someone to be able to add/edit/delete events to this calendar 
- but edit/delete ONLY events that they themselves created, all they 
need to do is 'invite' that calendar user to the event...


Done. The event shows up (is auto-accepted) on the Shared calendar for 
all users to see, and only the user who created the event (or a user who 
has full control) can edit/update/delete it.


Works well for us, with one exception... I'd like to see the following 
config options available:


 * Have an 'auto-accept events from any valid user' checkbox for a
   users personal calendar (so this behavior can actually be turned off
   - I don;t like that it happens automatically with no way to disable it)

and

 * Have a config option to force a refresh of that calendar for all
   users who have access to it when an event is added/updated/deleted.

Right now, it will not show up right away, and the default for calendar 
refreshes is 30 minutes, so it could conceivably be 30 minutes before 
all users will see the new or changed event.


--

Best regards,

Charles
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] group calendar for room reservation and booking

[Christian Mack]

Hello Orm Finnendahl

Am 2014-04-16 09:49, schrieb Orm Finnendahl:
> 
>  for a room reservation and booking system at our school we're looking
> for a group calendar with the following properties:
> 
> - Everybody in a group has the right to create entries
> 
> - Everybody in the group has read access to all entries
> 
> - Only the person who created an entry has the permission to
>   edit/delete it (apart from the admin of course).
> 
> Is this possible in SOGo (or even the standard way)? Sorry, if I'm
> asking something obvious, but I'm new to SOGo and couldn't find the
> appropriate information in the docs. We're reluctant to set up a
> server before making sure that it is actually possible.
> 

You can use a resource account per room.
Resource accounts autoaccept invitations, if they are not already
overbooked.
For rooms you would set multiplebookings to 1.
With that only one event can book that room at the same time.

Users who want to book this room, just have to invite it.
If it is free, it will be booked for her/him.

The only thing not possible is, to restrict the group of people able to
book this resource.
That is because all SOGo users are capable of inviteing all resources.

For LDAP configuration see
http://wiki.sogo.nu/ResourceConfiguration


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Abteilung Basisdienste
KIM IT-Services
Universität Konstanz



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector

[Charles Marcus]

On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč  wrote:

I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
source licensed projects.


Thanks (again) Adam... :)

One last question on these libraries...

You had said you were planning on eliminating the need for these 
eventually, but not 'soon'...


Any idea how long it might take? I mean, are you thinking months? Or years?


You can check project page (https://sourceforge.net/projects/getout) and
download prebuilt binary there. I already installed it for some users
(~10) and everything works fine so you can test it as well ;)


Thanks Adam, I absolutely will...

Sorry, but I do have a few more questions (I've mentioned this to a few 
of our users who have been most vocal about using Outlook, and they are 
chomping at the bit to test this, but I don't want to go down this road 
without knowing as much as possible what to expect)...


Is there any documentation at all? Ie, how to use it?

Also any documentation regarding  *known* issues? Ie, things that you 
know aren't working or known bugs, etc?


Couldn't find anything on the sourceforge site...

Also, I assume you be sending emails to the GetOut users list (just 
subscribed) announcing new releases, and monitoring it for questions?


Any chance you can ask some of the users you've installed it for to 
subscribe to the GetOut users list and report their experiences?


Last - should I/we be using the sourceforge Ticket system for reporting 
bugs/problems? Or just the mail list?


Personally, since I seem to be liking the newer versions of Office less 
and less with each release, I'm really excited about the possibility of 
supporting the older versions on SOGo without having to use Openchange.


--

Best regards,

Charles

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Active sync problem iPhone

[Martin Simovic]

Hi,

I am experiencing problems with ActiveSync on my iPhone, with following setup:

- Ubuntu 12.04
- SOGo 2.2.3 + Activesync from Inverse repositories
- Samba4 as authentication backend
- Posfix MTA
- Dovecot 2.1 (from Quantal repositories)
- Mysql 5.5
- iPhone 5S, iOS 7.1

The problem is that push notifications “do not work”. This means, that on new 
mail arrival I expect an iPhone to notify me regardless of application being 
closed or phone being locked and it is not happening. If I open mail 
application it fetches new emails. Account is configured as MicrosoftExchange 
and notification set to Push.

Other, possibly related issue is that since having this account configured, 
phone is draining far more battery than before. sogo.log is showing an entry in 
5 second intervals:

2014-04-16 12:14:00.343 sogod[1287] -[WEClientCapabilities initWithRequest:]: 
Unknown WebClient: user-agent='Apple-iPhone6C2/1104.167'
2014-04-16 12:14:00.343 sogod[1287] Got Ping request with valid interval - 
sleeping for 5 seconds.
178.40.159.83 - - [16/Apr/2014:12:14:05 GMT] "POST 
/SOGo/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync?User=steve&DeviceId=ApplF2LLLFTQFFG9&DeviceType=iPhone&Cmd=Ping
 HTTP/1.1" 200 13/0 5.003 - - 0

Best Regards,

Martin Šimovič

NETSON s.r.o.
Mlynská 1/2338
934 01 Levice
tel: +421 915 393 570
mail: mar...@netson.sk



-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector

[Adam Tkáč]

2014-04-02 13:19 GMT+02:00 Charles Marcus :

>  On 4/1/2014 7:25 AM, Adam Tkáč  wrote:
>
>
>
>   4. What are these 'Outlook Redemption libraries' - which are non-free,
>> commercially licensed - that are required for installation, why are they
>> needed, and will they always be needed?
>>
>
> I plan to get rid of Redemption libraries but not in near future. They are
> used to bypass Microsoft Outlook security patch which prevents connector to
> work fine without user input (you will have to confirm that other app wants
> to modify your calendar etc...)
>
>
> Ok, so, one follow-up question on this...
>
> On the download site for the redemption libraries, it specifically says:
>
> "This version displays a message box when it is installed on any
> computer.
> It is licensed for the development purposes only and cannot be used with
> any commercial software.
> Includes both 32 and 64 bit versions."
>
> http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/download.htm
>
> I'm guessing since both SOGo and the new GetOut Connector are
> free/open-source licensed, there is no problem using them until you are
> able to remove the requirement?
>

I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
source licensed projects.


>
> Last question... how long do you anticipate before you have something
> that is usable/ready for testing?
>

You can check project page (https://sourceforge.net/projects/getout) and
download prebuilt binary there. I already installed it for some users (~10)
and everything works fine so you can test it as well ;)

Regards, Adam
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] group calendar for room reservation and booking

[Orm Finnendahl]

Hi,

 for a room reservation and booking system at our school we're looking
for a group calendar with the following properties:

- Everybody in a group has the right to create entries

- Everybody in the group has read access to all entries

- Only the person who created an entry has the permission to
  edit/delete it (apart from the admin of course).

Is this possible in SOGo (or even the standard way)? Sorry, if I'm
asking something obvious, but I'm new to SOGo and couldn't find the
appropriate information in the docs. We're reluctant to set up a
server before making sure that it is actually possible.

Yours,
Orm
--
Prof. Orm Finnendahl
Komposition
Hochschule für Musik und Darstellende Kunst
Eschersheimer Landstr. 29-39
60322 Frankfurt am Main

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Aw: RE: [SOGo] Samba 4.2 and sogo

[Daniel Müller]

 
If you do install Openchange with your SOGo this things will haben. 

Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2014 um 09:35 Uhr
Von: "Matthew Sharlot" 
An: "users@sogo.nu" 
Betreff: RE: [SOGo] Samba 4.2 and sogo



Many thanks, being a typical man, reading a manual was the last thing i wanted to do, but as usual probably the best thing to do.!

Sent from my Windows Phone



From: T.B.
Sent: ‎13/‎04/‎2014 21:56
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] Samba 4.2 and sogo
 


Hi Matthew,

please read this to get a basic understanding of Ubuntu / Linux
directory structure:

https://help.ubuntu.com/12.10/installation-guide/amd64/directory-tree.html

and

http://www.howtogeek.com/117435/htg-explains-the-linux-directory-structure-explained/



Am 13.04.2014 13:43, schrieb matt...@federal.co.uk:
> Hi completely new to linux, samba and sogo, so please be gentle. Found some
> great walkthroughs for setup, but they all seem to be on the early releases of
> Samba4. I am using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with Samba v4.2. Just got that working,
> including setting GPO's, folder redirection etc. and was really pleased with
> myself. Then I started on the Sogo installation and completely broke Samba.
> For some reason it tries to reprovision samba, which I don't think is the real
> issue. The issue I think is that it would seem that previous versions of Samba
> seem to be under /etc/samba where the version I have is under /usr/local/
> samba/.
> I'm not asking for anybody to help fix this (although it would be nice) but is
> there anywhere I can keep an eye on development to let me know when things
> have progressed to this level?
> I can't seem to find anything online as to why samba moved the directory yet,
> but I'll keep pursuing that angle as it seems to be a big problem with
> anything that integrates.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists