Title: BTS activities for Wednesday, November 09 2016
BTS Activities
Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
Project: SOGo
For the period covering: Wednesday, November 09 2016
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
Op 09-11-16 om 15:18 schreef Paul van der Vlis
(p...@vandervlis.nl):
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes I see problems with users using Apple Ical and sogo 2.2.9 from
> Debian stable. New created appointments are gone then.
>
> In the logs I see this:
> [07/Nov/2016:22:58:13 GMT] "MOVE
>
they all have an email address and it did not help setting
canAuthenticate = YES;
in the sogo groups definition.
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 at 10:04 AM
From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)"
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap
On 11/08/2016 01:29 PM, Pablo Abelenda wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 02:04 PM, Pablo Abelenda (pabele...@igalia.com) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using SOGo for quite a while. My setup involves an apache that
>> does reverse proxy to the application.
>>
>> Last week I've upgraded the proxy from apache
Hello,
Sometimes I see problems with users using Apple Ical and sogo 2.2.9 from
Debian stable. New created appointments are gone then.
In the logs I see this:
[07/Nov/2016:22:58:13 GMT] "MOVE
/SOGo/dav/hans/Calendar/227A-501D7500-9-6BEF3500/A235338E-F830-4B10-94E9-BF2379995CE6.ics
HTTP/1.1" 201
Hi people,
I have created 2 accounts and therefor have by default 2 calenders.
The 1st account I created, I can sync without any problems, add
contacts, delete contacts. Everything fine and great.
The moment I create a second account, and I want via SyncML create
contacts, It's always 0-byte.
Hi,
I've been struggling to resolve an issue with address books shared as
read-only in SOGo accessed through Thunderbird (with
connector). When a user tries to modify an existing list of
contacts or a contact in the read-only address book (despite warning him
not to do so...), it breaks the
thanks francis for the info.
we have plenty of ldap groups ( type = GroupOfUniqueNames ). all these groups do show up in the addressbook but none of does show up in the searchresult list when i try to add a user in the access rights dialog - neither for a calendar nor for an addressbook. so i
Hello
Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca):
>> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com) wrote:
>>
>> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books?
>> has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?
>
>