[SOGo] BTS activities for Wednesday, November 09 2016

[SOGo reporter]

Title: BTS activities for Wednesday, November 09 2016





  
BTS Activities

  Home page: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs
  Project: SOGo
  For the period covering: Wednesday, November 09 2016

  
  
idlast updatestatus (resolution)categorysummary
	
	
	  
	
3887
	2016-11-09 10:02:26
	updated (open)
	Backend Address Book
	PROPFIND 404 Status for certain account
	
	  
	
3884
	2016-11-09 15:25:57
	updated (open)
	Web Address Book
	CAS authentication does not work with XHR requests
	
	  
	
3888
	2016-11-09 10:19:16
	updated (open)
	with SOGo
	Confidential entrys viewable in frontend
	
	  
	
3886
	2016-11-09 10:38:42
	resolved (fixed)
	GUI
	"Note" Field in Contanct is not shown in Frontend
	
	  
	
3885
	2016-11-09 17:24:29
	resolved (fixed)
	Web Preferences
	Vacation - Enable auto replay date
	
	  
	
  
  


-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Ical and MOVE

[Paul van der Vlis]

Op 09-11-16 om 15:18 schreef Paul van der Vlis
(p...@vandervlis.nl):
> Hello,
> 
> Sometimes I see problems with users using Apple Ical and sogo 2.2.9 from
> Debian stable. New created appointments are gone then.
> 
> In the logs I see this:
> [07/Nov/2016:22:58:13 GMT] "MOVE
> /SOGo/dav/hans/Calendar/227A-501D7500-9-6BEF3500/A235338E-F830-4B10-94E9-BF2379995CE6.ics
> HTTP/1.1" 201 0/0 0.019 - - 0
> 
> Has somebody else seen this too?
> 
> When do I get a MOVE in my logs?

I think it's used by Ical when moving an appoinment from one calendar to
another calendar.

When Thunderbird does this, it does not use MOVE.

Please tell if you know more.

Paul.



-- 
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

["sg gs"]

they all have an email address and it did not help setting

 

canAuthenticate = YES;

 

in the sogo groups definition.

 
 



Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 at 10:04 AM
From: "\"Christian Mack\" (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de)" 
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

Hello

Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca):
>> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com)  wrote:
>>
>> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?
>
> This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup.
>

Groups must have a valid email address, then they work in SOGo for
access privileges too.

Beware that changing a group membership doesn't change the already given
privileges.
The owners of calendars and address books shared based on groups have to
apply those regularly, in order to update the privileges.
See also
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2054


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

--
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416
 



-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Retry message on login having SOGo behind a proxy

[Pablo Abelenda]

On 11/08/2016 01:29 PM, Pablo Abelenda wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 02:04 PM, Pablo Abelenda (pabele...@igalia.com) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using SOGo for quite a while. My setup involves an apache that
>> does reverse proxy to the application.
>>
>> Last week I've upgraded the proxy from apache 2.2 into apache 2.4.10.
>> Since then, I've hitting a little issue. Everytime I enter the login and
>> password on the login form the UI show up a red error message saying
>> "Retry". If I reload the page, I am redirected into my calendar, which
>> is my default login module.
>>
>> No error on the apache nor sogo log files. Just nothing after the POST
>> to /connect/.
>>
>> If I try to access the service directly, without using the proxy, I do
>> not suffer this. the login process just works as it should.
>>
>> I know this is not an issue in SOGo, I am just asking here in case
>> someone else here has suffered the same situation.
>>
>> Best.
>>
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> seems like the password change form is also affected by this.
> 
> Is there anyone here experiencing this?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 

Just for the record, if anyone suffers this, this was the one to blame:

# apache security config
Header edit Set-Cookie ^(.*)$ $1;HttpOnly;Secure

Best.

-- 
Pablo Abelenda



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[SOGo] Ical and MOVE

[Paul van der Vlis]

Hello,

Sometimes I see problems with users using Apple Ical and sogo 2.2.9 from
Debian stable. New created appointments are gone then.

In the logs I see this:
[07/Nov/2016:22:58:13 GMT] "MOVE
/SOGo/dav/hans/Calendar/227A-501D7500-9-6BEF3500/A235338E-F830-4B10-94E9-BF2379995CE6.ics
HTTP/1.1" 201 0/0 0.019 - - 0

Has somebody else seen this too?

When do I get a MOVE in my logs?

With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.


-- 
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] 2nd account doesn't sync, always 0 byte data

[Tamer Higazi]

Hi people,
I have created 2 accounts and therefor have by default 2 calenders.
The 1st account I created, I can sync without any problems, add 
contacts, delete contacts. Everything fine and great.


The moment I create a second account, and I want via SyncML create 
contacts, It's always 0-byte.
I try to move Data from one account's address book to the other one, it 
stays and remanins empty.


What have I done wrong, or is it a bug that needs to be closed ?


best, Tamer


Nov 09 14:12:52 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/Contacts HTTP/1.1" 302 0/0 0.004 - - 0
Nov 09 14:12:52 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/Contacts/view HTTP/1.1" 200 14614/0 0.023 
59190 75% 0
Nov 09 14:12:52 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/Calendar/alarmslist?browserTime=1478697172 
HTTP/1.1" 200 63/0 0.008 - - 0
Nov 09 14:12:52 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/jsonDefaults HTTP/1.1" 200 3074/0 0.009 - - 0
Nov 09 14:12:52 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/jsonSettings HTTP/1.1" 200 307/0 0.003 - - 0
Nov 09 14:12:53 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/Contacts/personal/view?asc=1=1=name_or_address=c_cn= 
HTTP/1.1" 200 146/0 0.028 - - 0
Nov 09 14:12:55 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "GET 
/SOGo/so/tamer@**.net/Contacts/personal/links HTTP/1.1" 200 483/0 
0.008 1043 53% 0
Nov 09 14:14:29 sogod [5582]: 127.0.0.1 "PROPFIND 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**.net/Contacts/personal/ HTTP/1.1" 401 0/175 0.002 
- - 0
Nov 09 14:14:29 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "DELETE 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**-it.com/Contacts/personal/C74ADED6-A040-0001-2532-139A184A1E04.vcf 
HTTP/1.1" 204 0/0 0.053 - - 0
Nov 09 14:14:29 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "PROPFIND 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**.net/Contacts/personal/ HTTP/1.1" 404 64/175 0.010 
- - 0
Nov 09 14:15:14 sogod [5584]: 127.0.0.1 "PROPFIND 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**-it.com/Contacts/personal/ HTTP/1.1" 207 429/175 
0.009 1044 58% 0
Nov 09 14:15:14 sogod [5582]: 127.0.0.1 "DELETE 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**.net/Contacts/personal/C74ADED6-A040-0001-2532-139A184A1E04.vcf 
HTTP/1.1" 404 111/0 0.005 - - 0
Nov 09 14:15:14 sogod [5582]: 127.0.0.1 "REPORT 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**-it.com/Contacts/personal/ HTTP/1.1" 207 298/144 
0.010 - - 0
Nov 09 14:15:15 sogod [5582]: 
<0x5651a54d79e0[SOGoContactGCSEntry]:C74ADED6-A040-0001-2532-139A184A1E04.vcf> 
TODO: implement if-none-match for etag: '*'
Nov 09 14:15:15 sogod [5582]: 127.0.0.1 "PUT 
/SOGo/dav/tamer@**-it.com/Contacts/personal/C74ADED6-A040-0001-2532-139A184A1E04.vcf 
HTTP/1.1" 201 0/300 0.069 - - 64K


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] [SOGO] read-only shared address book and sync.

[Olivier BURAIS]

Hi,

I've been struggling to resolve an issue with address books shared as 
read-only in SOGo accessed through Thunderbird (with 
connector). When a user tries to modify an existing list of 
contacts or a contact in the read-only address book (despite warning him 
not to do so...), it breaks the sync of that list.


As per the comments on 
https://sogo.nu/bugs/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=2714, I've come to 
realise when getting a 403 result on uploading a vcf/vlf to SOGo, the 
card is kept as it is, and the change is not dropped. It'll keep trying 
to sync the change despite not being allowed to. There is indeed a 
notification that the sync failed in the bottom right corner, but not 
why nor on what contact/list it failed.  (the user is not able to know 
how to drop the change, and the only way to correct it is to unsubscribe 
from the address book)


The result is that the contact or list of contacts is not synced anymore 
(and that's an issue for a shared address read-only book that is 
expected to be up to date).
Is there a way to make the address book truly read-only on the 
Thunderbird side, either by forbidding changes in the address book, or 
by dropping them in case of a sync error (instead of retrying those) ?


Best regards,

*Olivier BURAIS*
Systèmes et réseaux
obur...@dbmtechnologies.com DBM Technologies
+33(0)4 72 83 52 28
www.dbmtechnologies.com 
11 rue Dedieu
69100 Villeurbanne


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

["sg gs"]

thanks francis for the info.

 

we have plenty of ldap groups ( type = GroupOfUniqueNames ). all these groups do show up in the addressbook but none of does show up in the searchresult list when i try to add a user in the access rights dialog - neither for a calendar nor for an addressbook. so i guess something is configured wrong/uncomplete.

 

i guess that i missed something. what are the prerequisites for a group to show up?

 

thanks in advance, sg

 

Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 at 7:48 PM
From: "\"Francis Lachapelle\" (flachape...@inverse.ca)" 
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com)  wrote:
>
> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?

This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup.


Francis
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists



-- users@sogo.nuhttps://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] ldap addressbooks with filter based on dynamic ldap group

[Christian Mack]

Hello

Am 08.11.2016 um 19:48 schrieb Francis Lachapelle (flachape...@inverse.ca):
>> On Nov 7, 2016, at 10:26 AM, sg gs (s...@mail.com)  wrote:
>>
>> btw: what about group based access rights for calendars and address books? 
>> has this been implemeted/will it be implemented?
> 
> This is already supported for LDAP sources. We handle object class of type 
> group, groupofnames, groupofuniquenames, and posixgroup.
> 

Groups must have a valid email address, then they work in SOGo for
access privileges too.

Beware that changing a group membership doesn't change the already given
privileges.
The owners of calendars and address books shared based on groups have to
apply those regularly, in order to update the privileges.
See also
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=2054


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature