Re: [SOGo] Auto mark mail as read in outlook
Guys, I just installed the recently nightly build package, and got the same 'BUG' on the incoming new email. Even we didn't open the said mail, it will mark as read, the second time Microsoft Outlook retrieve emails from the server. Anyone else got this problem or some of us? Please fix it in the official release! On Thursday, September 26, 2013, wrote: Hai all, When I got the email for the first time in outlook, email is marked as unread. after that, I click send and Receive and email is automatically marked as read. Is this an error in outlook or sogo? What do you think? To inform you all, i have been using the nightly builds of 2.1.0 -- users@sogo.nu javascript:; https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Multiple domain
Hi,
I would just double confirm based on the sample given.
Can I have us...@first.com who is different than us...@second.com?
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote:
2013-09-25 12:14 keltezéssel, javier.marin.re...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'javier.marin.re...@gmail.com');írta:
sorry for my ignorance, but do not really understand what I indicate. Could
you
give me some more detail on how to do?
Thank you very much.
Example - three users and three domains.
User 1
us...@first.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@first.com');
us...@second.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@second.com');
us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@third.com');
User 2
us...@second.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@second.com');
us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@third.com');
User 3
us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@third.com');
LDAP is the Samba4 AD
# user 1
dn: cn=user1;cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
mail: us...@first.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@first.com');
othermailbox: us...@second.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'us...@second.com');
othermailbox: us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'us...@third.com');
# user 2
dn: cn=user2;cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
mail: us...@second.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@second.com');
othermailbox: us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'us...@third.com');
# user 3
dn: cn=user3;cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
mail: us...@third.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'us...@third.com');
*Postfix related settings*
postfix-ldap.conf:
version = 3
server_host = 127.0.0.1
server_port = 389
timeout = 60
search_base = cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
query_filter = (|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))
result_attribute = sAMAccountName
bind = yes
bind_dn = cn=administrator,cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
bind_pw = Som3P@ss
# -- End
main.cf:
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/postfix-ldap.conf
relay_transport = ldap:/etc/postfix/postfix-ldap.conf
virtual_mailbox_domains = first.com, second.com, third.com, example.local
# -- End
*Dovecot related settings*
dovecot-ldap.conf:
hosts = 127.0.0.1:389
dn = cn=administrator,cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
dnpass = Som3P@ss
auth_bind = yes
tls = no
deref = never
ldap_version = 3
base = cn=users,dc=example,dc=local
scope = subtree
user_attrs = =home=/var/mail,=uid=5000,=gid=5000
user_filter =
((sAMAccountName=%u)(objectClass=person)(!(userAccountControl=514)))
pass_filter =
((sAMAccountName=%u)(objectClass=person)(!(userAccountControl=514)))
pass_attrs = userPassword=password,sAMAccountName=user
*SOGo related settings*
SOGoUserSources = (
{
CNFieldName = displayName;
IDFieldName = cn;
MailFieldNames = (
mail,
otherMailbox
);
SearchFieldNames = (
sn,
sAMAccountName,
mail,
otherMailbox,
displayName
);
UIDFieldName = sAMAccountName;
baseDN = cn=users,dc=example,dc=local;
bindDN = cn=administrator,cn=users,dc=example,dc=local;
bindFileds = (
sAMAccountName
);
bindPassword = Som3P@ss;
canAuthenticate = YES;
displayName = Shared Addresses;
hostname = 127.0.0.1;
id = someid;
isAddressBook = YES;
port = 389;
}
);
I'm using four domains In my system in one SOGo instance with configured
services such as above. It's working fine.
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Active Sync support in SOGo
Hi,
So does this going to be like OpenXchange or Zarafa or Zimbra or other
email solution which will be chargeable based on the user accessing via
Microsoft ActiveSync protocol.
Why can't we move away from Microsoft license.
On Thursday, September 19, 2013, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
Hello,
We've been pretty silent when it came to Active Sync support in SOGo for
multiple reasons.
First of all, there are licensing implications with Microsoft Active Sync.
Moreover, there's a plethora of Active Sync implementations out there. We
also wanted to see how vendors would adopt CalDAV/CardDAV, how down the
drain Funambol would go and the market's impact of the new
Windows/Blackberry phones.
After digesting all the above for a few weeks, we came to the conclusion
we should most likely add Active Sync support to SOGo.
Over the past few days, I've been (and still are) in contact with an IP
Licensing person at Microsoft. We had interesting discussions which led us
to believe we could:
1. create an Active Sync bundle in SOGo for synchronization
2. license it under a free but non-GPL (BSD, for example)
3. distribute it for free
We can't use the GPL because of patents restrictions.
Z-Push/OPush/Synchotron are all using patented technologies without a
license and Microsoft currently does not license to GPL implementations -
so using these is not an option.
Since the addition of Active Sync support in SOGo would be a server-side
implementation, there would be a per-mailbox fee to use it. That fee, would
have to be paid to Microsoft directly. On our end, everything would be free
of use.
Evidently, if we start working on Active Sync support in SOGo, we'll
definitively drop Funambol support - which is probably even more exciting
then adding Active Sync support.
Thanks!
--
Ludovic marcottelmarco...@inverse.ca javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'lmarco...@inverse.ca'); :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Meeting Invitation - Calendar
Hi, Anyone successfully invite attendees in their calendar via Microsoft Outlook? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] ZEG install script
Hi, I had been trying to install SOGo using ZEG install script in my office, where the network are managed by policies and rules; I am stucked at Step 4, where after the script listed the network parameters, I am seeing Wait to start Samba4 LDAP which takes forever, even I had tried installing couple of times. I did managed to install this at home. Please assist what I should do. Thank you On Monday, August 5, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote: 2013-08-05 16:29 keltezéssel, m...@line5.tv írta: Cool script, I am impressed. There were some error messages, sorry, was too few time to read or screenshot them - but still, without any further configuration I was able to connect Outlook and to use the web interface. Thank you! The error messages were at the samba4/openchange install step, I know. Those came from the sogo repository, and the guys reported it on the SOGo install documentation with 'don't care' remark ;) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] opening winmail.dat files
tnef winmail.dat On Friday, July 12, 2013, mourik jan heupink wrote: Hi Silver, It's not possible as far as I know: It's one of the most annoying shortcomings of SOGo at the moment. As I said in the bugreport: roundcube works, so at least we can tell our staff to use roundcube to open these mails. MJ On 07/11/2013 10:24 AM, Silver Salonen wrote: Hi. Is it somehow possible to see contents of winmail.dat files from the webmail? There is bug report http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/bug_** view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=**2242http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=2242for that, but it's pending? -- Silver -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] opening winmail.dat files
http://www.postfixvirtual.net/postfixantivirus.html On Friday, July 12, 2013, mourik jan heupink wrote: Hi, On 07/12/2013 02:53 PM, Mail Robot wrote: tnef winmail.dat Ok, first of all I didn't know that, so thanks. However this doesn't help our webaccess users... MJ -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] running sogo in production
Correct me if I am wrong, so the said 100 users limitation in SOGo is not due to the system but rather if running the ZEG copy. So if I do a native installation, there shall be no limitation? I am confused :( On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Julien Kerihuel wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:18 +0200, Fabio Onorini wrote: Thanks Jiulien, so isn't a really limit, is only a performance suggestion? This is correct. ...and is only ZEG problem ? I wouldn't call it a problem since ZEG has never been intended/designed to be used in production and is only a test environment for customers. On non-virtual enviroment, exist limit? This precaution shouldn't apply if your hardware requirements meet OpenChange needs but this statement comes without any warranty. Kind regards, Julien. 2013/7/10 Julien Kerihuel j.kerih...@openchange.org On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:53 +0200, Fabio Onorini wrote: Someone know more info about this user limit? I think samba can create more than 100 users, and do not understand what the problem might be to extend the attributes. Where really is the problem? Hi Fabio, This limit is more a safety measure with regards to the ZEG resources rather than a limitation. Kind Regards, Julien. 2013/7/7 Mail Robot themailro...@gmail.com Ludovic Marcotte did acknowledge it by saying He's most likely talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation I also were told the same by my vendor before. On Sunday, July 7, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote: 2013-07-07 01:25 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta: OpenChange limitation only work for users less than 100 ? Are you really? OpenChange just an extension for Samba 4 AD for the exchange compatibility. So, where is the limit? In the Samba 4 (cannot create more user in AD) or in the OpenChange (cannot extend more user's ldap properties) or nowhere? -- Julien Kerihuel j.kerih...@openchange.org OpenChange Project Founder Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkerihuel GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists - -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] running sogo in production
Please confirm On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Mail Robot wrote: Correct me if I am wrong, so the said 100 users limitation in SOGo is not due to the system but rather if running the ZEG copy. So if I do a native installation, there shall be no limitation? I am confused :( On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Julien Kerihuel wrote: On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 10:18 +0200, Fabio Onorini wrote: Thanks Jiulien, so isn't a really limit, is only a performance suggestion? This is correct. ...and is only ZEG problem ? I wouldn't call it a problem since ZEG has never been intended/designed to be used in production and is only a test environment for customers. On non-virtual enviroment, exist limit? This precaution shouldn't apply if your hardware requirements meet OpenChange needs but this statement comes without any warranty. Kind regards, Julien. 2013/7/10 Julien Kerihuel j.kerih...@openchange.org On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 09:53 +0200, Fabio Onorini wrote: Someone know more info about this user limit? I think samba can create more than 100 users, and do not understand what the problem might be to extend the attributes. Where really is the problem? Hi Fabio, This limit is more a safety measure with regards to the ZEG resources rather than a limitation. Kind Regards, Julien. 2013/7/7 Mail Robot themailro...@gmail.com Ludovic Marcotte did acknowledge it by saying He's most likely talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation I also were told the same by my vendor before. On Sunday, July 7, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote: 2013-07-07 01:25 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta: OpenChange limitation only work for users less than 100 ? Are you really? OpenChange just an extension for Samba 4 AD for the exchange compatibility. So, where is the limit? In the Samba 4 (cannot create more user in AD) or in the OpenChange (cannot extend more user's ldap properties) or nowhere? -- Julien Kerihuel j.kerih...@openchange.org OpenChange Project Founder Twitter: http://twitter.com/jkerihuel GPG Fingerprint: 0B55 783D A781 6329 108A B609 7EF6 FE11 A35F 1F79 -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists - -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] running sogo in production
Ludovic Marcotte did acknowledge it by saying He's most likely talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation I also were told the same by my vendor before. On Sunday, July 7, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote: 2013-07-07 01:25 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta: OpenChange limitation only work for users less than 100 ? Are you really? OpenChange just an extension for Samba 4 AD for the exchange compatibility. So, where is the limit? In the Samba 4 (cannot create more user in AD) or in the OpenChange (cannot extend more user's ldap properties) or nowhere? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] running sogo in production
OpenChange limitation only work for users less than 100 On Sunday, July 7, 2013, Martin Rabl wrote: Am 07.07.13 00:47, schrieb Geoff Nordli: I also forgot to mention we have an existing Active Directory environment it would need to plug into. We are authenticate against AD, too. No problems, too. -- users@sogo.nu javascript:; https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] SOGo User Limitation
Hi, Previously I was told that SOGo got problem that it is unable to handle user if more than 100 users. In this new release of 2.0.6b, had the limitation being fixed? Thank you -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Re: SOGo User Limitation
Hi, Yeah, since SOGo depend on OpenChange for Outlook user's native experience. Had this issues resolved? Regards On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: On 2013-07-03 6:28 AM, Martin Rabl wrote: Am 03.07.13 09:48, schrieb Mail Robot: Previously I was told that SOGo got problem that it is unable to handle user if more than 100 users. Really? Where did you get this info? He's most likely talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence ( http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Re: SOGo User Limitation
Hi, Any plan for the fix to be released? On Wednesday, July 3, 2013, Martin Rabl wrote: Am 03.07.13 13:00, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte: On 2013-07-03 6:28 AM, Martin Rabl wrote: Am 03.07.13 09:48, schrieb Mail Robot: Previously I was told that SOGo got problem that it is unable to handle user if more than 100 users. Really? Where did you get this info? He's most likely talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation. Ah, thank you, Ludovic! Greetings, Martin -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
