Re: [SOGo] SOGo upgrading - some SOPE components was not upgraded
I have read-only account at bugs.sogo.nu - 'pavelzh' Can you promote me? On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:20 PM smizr...@alinto.eu wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Can you please open a ticket on bugs.sogo.nu ? I will have a look on that > > Sebastien > > Le Mercredi, Février 28, 2024 10:37 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > > > I performed upgrade sogo from > 5.9.1.20240120-1 to 5.10.0.20240227-1 and noted that some SOPE components > was not upgraded - dpkg status changes Begin > > > > Upgraded: > libsbjson2.3:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-appserver4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-core4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-gdl1-4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-ldap4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-mime4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-xml4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > sogo-activesync:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 > sogo:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 > > -- dpkg status changes End - > But > # dpkg -l|grep sope ii libsope-appserver4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE > application server libraries ii libsope-core4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 > Core libraries of the SOPE application server ii libsope-gdl1-4.9 > 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 GNUstep database libraries for SOPE ii > libsope-ldap4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for LDAP access ii > libsope-mime4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for MIME processing > ii libsope-xml4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for XML > processing ii sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 PostgreSQL > connector for SOPE's fork of the GNUstep database environment ii > sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 XML Parser for SOPE's SAX > engine > > sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql and sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver was not upgraded, but > listed as upgradeable > > # apt list --upgradeable|grep sope > > WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in > scripts. > > sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: > 4.9.r1664.20231221] > sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: > 4.9.r1664.20231221] > > Something broken in dependencies, or I should do this upgrade manually? > > WBR, Pavel Zh. > > > >
Re: [SOGo] SOGo upgrading - some SOPE components was not upgraded
I replayed command history - upgrade command from 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 was ‘apt-get install sogo sogo-activesync sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver’ So, It’s my mistake, not a bug - I simple type ‘apt-get install SOGo’ Ср, 28 февр. 2024 г. в 16:20, smizr...@alinto.eu : > Hi Pavel, > > Can you please open a ticket on bugs.sogo.nu ? I will have a look on that > > Sebastien > > Le Mercredi, Février 28, 2024 10:37 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > > > I performed upgrade sogo from > 5.9.1.20240120-1 to 5.10.0.20240227-1 and noted that some SOPE components > was not upgraded - dpkg status changes Begin > > > > Upgraded: > libsbjson2.3:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-appserver4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-core4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-gdl1-4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-ldap4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-mime4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > libsope-xml4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 > sogo-activesync:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 > sogo:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 > > -- dpkg status changes End - > But > # dpkg -l|grep sope ii libsope-appserver4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE > application server libraries ii libsope-core4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 > Core libraries of the SOPE application server ii libsope-gdl1-4.9 > 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 GNUstep database libraries for SOPE ii > libsope-ldap4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for LDAP access ii > libsope-mime4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for MIME processing > ii libsope-xml4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for XML > processing ii sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 PostgreSQL > connector for SOPE's fork of the GNUstep database environment ii > sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 XML Parser for SOPE's SAX > engine > > sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql and sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver was not upgraded, but > listed as upgradeable > > # apt list --upgradeable|grep sope > > WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in > scripts. > > sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: > 4.9.r1664.20231221] > sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: > 4.9.r1664.20231221] > > Something broken in dependencies, or I should do this upgrade manually? > > WBR, Pavel Zh. > > > >
Re: [SOGo] Domain Address Book doesn't show entries
Index of /nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo [image: [ICO]]Name <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/?C=N;O=D>Last modified <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/?C=M;O=A> Size <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/?C=S;O=A> Description <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/?C=D;O=A> -- [image: [PARENTDIR]] Parent Directory <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/> - [image: [ ]] sogo-activesync_5.10..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo-activesync_5.10.0.20240228-1_amd64.deb> 2024-02-28 09:51 1.2M [image: [ ]] sogo-dbg_5.10.0.2024..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo-dbg_5.10.0.20240228-1_amd64.deb> 2024-02-28 09:51 2.9M [image: [ ]] sogo-dev_5.10.0.2024..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo-dev_5.10.0.20240228-1_amd64.deb> 2024-02-28 09:51 1.1M [image: [ ]] sogo_5.10.0.20240228..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo_5.10.0.20240228-1.debian.tar.gz> 2024-02-28 09:51 5.9K [image: [TXT]] sogo_5.10.0.20240228..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo_5.10.0.20240228-1.dsc> 2024-02-28 09:51 1.4K [image: [ ]] sogo_5.10.0.20240228..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo_5.10.0.20240228-1_amd64.deb> 2024-02-28 09:51 25M [image: [ ]] sogo_5.10.0.20240228..> <https://packages.sogo.nu/nightly/5/debian/pool/bullseye/s/sogo/sogo_5.10.0.20240228.orig.tar.gz> 2024-02-28 09:51 34M 0228 nightly already available now On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 12:20 PM Christian Mack wrote: > Hello > > I do not get a Version 5.10.0.20240227 in nightlies for Debian bullseye. > In fact the last available version seems to be 5.10.0.20240223-1 > Is it just me? > > > Kind regards, > Christian Mack > > Am 27.02.24 um 14:46 schrieb Pavel Zheltobryukhov (pave...@gmail.com): > > Thanks, I suggested this, but decided to ask one more time > > WBR, Pavel > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:09 PM smizr...@alinto.eu > wrote: > > > >> Dear Pavel, > >> > >> I apologize this was a confusion on my side, you're right, in the > >> nightly 5.10.0.20240227 you have to use listRequiresDot = NO as in > >> 5.9.1. SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries has been removed to keep > >> only listRequiresDot. > >> But you can now use also globalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount if you want > to > >> limit the results displayed (in the SOGoUserSources part). > >> > >> Sorry for this, hope this helps. Let me know if you still have issues. > >> > >> Sebastien > >> > >> > >> Le Mardi, Février 27, 2024 09:11 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > >> pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > >> > >> > >> And those new settings will be removed in 5.10.0.20240227? due > 'fix(addressbook): > >> Removed SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries (use listRequiresDot instead) > >> and move SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount to > >> globalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount in source scope. This fixed the > broken > >> listRequiresDot in 5.10' > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:53 PM smizr...@alinto.eu > wrote: > >> > >>> Dear Pavel, > >>> > >>> You're right, those new settings will be included in the next release. > >>> As the documentation says, if you're using ldap you will need to enable > >>> sslv overlay, otherwise the list will not be sorted. > >>> > >>> Sebastien > >>> > >>> Le Dimanche, Janvier 21, 2024 21:34 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > >>> pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > >>> > >>> > >>> Search across SOGo gitlab and found two new parameters in sogo.conf > >>> (since Dec 18) > >>> > >>> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries > >>> Display first entries in Global Address Book. Default value is `NO`. If > >>> source is LDAP, the LDAP overlay `sssvlv` must be enabled on the > system for > >>> server side sorting. > >>> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount > >>> Number of entries displayed when `SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries` is > >>> enabled. Default value is `100`. > >>> > >>> This parameters affect Domain Address Book too. At least, you need to > set > >>> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries to 'YES' > >>> > >>> WBR, Pavel Zhe > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 4:45 PM Pavel Zheltobryukhov < > pave...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, I upgraded SOGo from 5.9.1.20231213-1 to 5.9.1.20240120-1 and > >>>> discovered that my Domain Address Book doesn't show any entries when > >>>> opened. If I type some chars in search field, DAB show me founded > entries > >>>> correctly. Is this a bug, or something changed in config files? > >>>> > >>>> WBR, Pavel Zhe > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Christian Mack > Universität Konstanz > Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM) > Abteilung IT-Dienste Forschung, Lehre, Infrastruktur > 78457 Konstanz > +49 7531 88-4416 > >
[SOGo] SOGo upgrading - some SOPE components was not upgraded
I performed upgrade sogo from 5.9.1.20240120-1 to 5.10.0.20240227-1 and noted that some SOPE components was not upgraded - dpkg status changes Begin Upgraded: libsbjson2.3:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-appserver4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-core4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-gdl1-4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-ldap4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-mime4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 libsope-xml4.9:amd64 4.9.r1664.20231221 => 4.9.r1664.20240220 sogo-activesync:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 sogo:amd64 5.9.1.20240120-1 => 5.10.0.20240227-1 -- dpkg status changes End - But # dpkg -l|grep sope ii libsope-appserver4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE application server libraries ii libsope-core4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 Core libraries of the SOPE application server ii libsope-gdl1-4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 GNUstep database libraries for SOPE ii libsope-ldap4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for LDAP access ii libsope-mime4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for MIME processing ii libsope-xml4.9 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 SOPE libraries for XML processing ii sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 PostgreSQL connector for SOPE's fork of the GNUstep database environment ii sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver 4.9.r1664.20231221 amd64 XML Parser for SOPE's SAX engine sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql and sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver was not upgraded, but listed as upgradeable # apt list --upgradeable|grep sope WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts. sope4.9-gdl1-postgresql/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: 4.9.r1664.20231221] sope4.9-libxmlsaxdriver/unknown 4.9.r1664.20240220 amd64 [upgradable from: 4.9.r1664.20231221] Something broken in dependencies, or I should do this upgrade manually? WBR, Pavel Zh.
Re: [SOGo] Domain Address Book doesn't show entries
Thanks, I suggested this, but decided to ask one more time WBR, Pavel On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:09 PM smizr...@alinto.eu wrote: > Dear Pavel, > > I apologize this was a confusion on my side, you're right, in the > nightly 5.10.0.20240227 you have to use listRequiresDot = NO as in > 5.9.1. SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries has been removed to keep > only listRequiresDot. > But you can now use also globalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount if you want to > limit the results displayed (in the SOGoUserSources part). > > Sorry for this, hope this helps. Let me know if you still have issues. > > Sebastien > > > Le Mardi, Février 27, 2024 09:11 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > > > And those new settings will be removed in 5.10.0.20240227? due > 'fix(addressbook): > Removed SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries (use listRequiresDot instead) > and move SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount to > globalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount in source scope. This fixed the broken > listRequiresDot in 5.10' > > On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:53 PM smizr...@alinto.eu wrote: > >> Dear Pavel, >> >> You're right, those new settings will be included in the next release. >> As the documentation says, if you're using ldap you will need to enable >> sslv overlay, otherwise the list will not be sorted. >> >> Sebastien >> >> Le Dimanche, Janvier 21, 2024 21:34 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( >> pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: >> >> >> Search across SOGo gitlab and found two new parameters in sogo.conf >> (since Dec 18) >> >> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries >> Display first entries in Global Address Book. Default value is `NO`. If >> source is LDAP, the LDAP overlay `sssvlv` must be enabled on the system for >> server side sorting. >> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount >> Number of entries displayed when `SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries` is >> enabled. Default value is `100`. >> >> This parameters affect Domain Address Book too. At least, you need to set >> SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries to 'YES' >> >> WBR, Pavel Zhe >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 4:45 PM Pavel Zheltobryukhov >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, I upgraded SOGo from 5.9.1.20231213-1 to 5.9.1.20240120-1 and >>> discovered that my Domain Address Book doesn't show any entries when >>> opened. If I type some chars in search field, DAB show me founded entries >>> correctly. Is this a bug, or something changed in config files? >>> >>> WBR, Pavel Zhe >>> >> >> >> > > > >
Re: [SOGo] sogo_admin table in 5.10
Not yet, but I planned to upgrade on next week. Thanks for the explanation. On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:12 PM smizr...@alinto.eu wrote: > Dear Pavel, > > This table is not mandatory and can be used to enabled the new "message of > the day" feature. > Did you add the settings "OCSAdminURL" on the configuration ? > > Sebastien > > Le Mercredi, Février 21, 2024 15:33 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > > > Hi to all, it's nice to hear what ver. 5.10 was released recently. Some > new parameters was introduced - OCSAdminURL and SOGoSuperUsernames . > In OCSAdminURL we need to set up a 'sogo_admin' table. Before start > upgrade, I did a SQL query about tables in sogo db > $ psql -U vmailadmin -d sogo > psql (12.17 (Ubuntu 12.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.1)) > Type "help" for help. > > sogo=> \dt > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner > ++---+--- > public | sogo_acl | table | sogo > public | sogo_alarms_folder | table | sogo > public | sogo_cache_folder | table | sogo > public | sogo_folder_info | table | sogo > public | sogo_quick_appointment | table | sogo > public | sogo_quick_contact | table | sogo > public | sogo_sessions_folder | table | sogo > public | sogo_store | table | sogo > public | sogo_user_profile | table | sogo > (9 rows) > > sogo=> > There is no 'sogo_admin' at this moment in 5.9.1 (nightly January build) . > Does this table will be created during upgrade process, or I should create > it before/after upgrade? > > WBR, Pavel Zhe > > > >
Re: [SOGo] Domain Address Book doesn't show entries
And those new settings will be removed in 5.10.0.20240227? due 'fix(addressbook): Removed SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries (use listRequiresDot instead) and move SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount to globalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount in source scope. This fixed the broken listRequiresDot in 5.10' On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 11:53 PM smizr...@alinto.eu wrote: > Dear Pavel, > > You're right, those new settings will be included in the next release. > As the documentation says, if you're using ldap you will need to enable > sslv overlay, otherwise the list will not be sorted. > > Sebastien > > Le Dimanche, Janvier 21, 2024 21:34 CET, "Pavel Zheltobryukhov" ( > pave...@gmail.com) a écrit: > > > Search across SOGo gitlab and found two new parameters in sogo.conf (since > Dec 18) > > SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries > Display first entries in Global Address Book. Default value is `NO`. If > source is LDAP, the LDAP overlay `sssvlv` must be enabled on the system for > server side sorting. > SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount > Number of entries displayed when `SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries` is > enabled. Default value is `100`. > > This parameters affect Domain Address Book too. At least, you need to set > SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries to 'YES' > > WBR, Pavel Zhe > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 4:45 PM Pavel Zheltobryukhov > wrote: > >> Hi, I upgraded SOGo from 5.9.1.20231213-1 to 5.9.1.20240120-1 and >> discovered that my Domain Address Book doesn't show any entries when >> opened. If I type some chars in search field, DAB show me founded entries >> correctly. Is this a bug, or something changed in config files? >> >> WBR, Pavel Zhe >> > > >
[SOGo] sogo_admin table in 5.10
Hi to all, it's nice to hear what ver. 5.10 was released recently. Some new parameters was introduced - OCSAdminURL and SOGoSuperUsernames . In OCSAdminURL we need to set up a 'sogo_admin' table. Before start upgrade, I did a SQL query about tables in sogo db $ psql -U vmailadmin -d sogo psql (12.17 (Ubuntu 12.17-0ubuntu0.20.04.1)) Type "help" for help. sogo=> \dt List of relations Schema | Name | Type | Owner ++---+--- public | sogo_acl | table | sogo public | sogo_alarms_folder | table | sogo public | sogo_cache_folder | table | sogo public | sogo_folder_info | table | sogo public | sogo_quick_appointment | table | sogo public | sogo_quick_contact | table | sogo public | sogo_sessions_folder | table | sogo public | sogo_store | table | sogo public | sogo_user_profile | table | sogo (9 rows) sogo=> There is no 'sogo_admin' at this moment in 5.9.1 (nightly January build) . Does this table will be created during upgrade process, or I should create it before/after upgrade? WBR, Pavel Zhe
Re: [SOGo] Is it posiible to get Domain Address Book from SOGo via CardDAV ?
Thank you! I was confused by missing 'three-vertical-dots' near DAB. ThunderBird discovered address books automatically via 'base-url' WBR, Pavel On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:48 AM Kees van Vloten wrote: > > On 25-01-2024 18:07, Pavel Zheltobryukhov (pave...@gmail.com) wrote: > > We have a SQL-based Domain Address Book in iRedMail+SOGo. I want to > connect it to ThunderBird via CardDAV protocol. But I coudn't find an URL > for this resource. Is it even possible? > > WBR, Pavel > > If you have "SOGoCalendarDAVAccessEnabled = YES;" in sogo.conf, > addressbooks including the domain-addressbook are available at: > > /SOGo/dav/@/Contacts > > In Thunderbird at "New CardDAV addressbook" paste the url, click continue > and it will show a list of available addressbooks, which contains among > others the domain-addressbook. > > - Kees. > > >
[SOGo] Is it posiible to get Domain Address Book from SOGo via CardDAV ?
We have a SQL-based Domain Address Book in iRedMail+SOGo. I want to connect it to ThunderBird via CardDAV protocol. But I coudn't find an URL for this resource. Is it even possible? WBR, Pavel
Re: [SOGo] Domain Address Book doesn't show entries
Search across SOGo gitlab and found two new parameters in sogo.conf (since Dec 18) SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries Display first entries in Global Address Book. Default value is `NO`. If source is LDAP, the LDAP overlay `sssvlv` must be enabled on the system for server side sorting. SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntriesCount Number of entries displayed when `SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries` is enabled. Default value is `100`. This parameters affect Domain Address Book too. At least, you need to set SOGoGlobalAddressBookFirstEntries to 'YES' WBR, Pavel Zhe On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 4:45 PM Pavel Zheltobryukhov wrote: > Hi, I upgraded SOGo from 5.9.1.20231213-1 to 5.9.1.20240120-1 and > discovered that my Domain Address Book doesn't show any entries when > opened. If I type some chars in search field, DAB show me founded entries > correctly. Is this a bug, or something changed in config files? > > WBR, Pavel Zhe >
[SOGo] Domain Address Book doesn't show entries
Hi, I upgraded SOGo from 5.9.1.20231213-1 to 5.9.1.20240120-1 and discovered that my Domain Address Book doesn't show any entries when opened. If I type some chars in search field, DAB show me founded entries correctly. Is this a bug, or something changed in config files? WBR, Pavel Zhe
