Re: [SOGo] Feature Request: Add multiselect to inbox items

[Hafiz Rafiyev]

How to Select Multiple Messages in SOGo Webmail¶To select multiple messages on your SOGo webmail interface:Click on the icon that looks like a person’s head and shoulders to the left of each messages. After you click one, they will all then be replaced with checkboxes.Select the desired messages.Click on one of the icons in the green bar at the top of the email list to choose the action that you want to perform.Oliver Enes  şunları yazdı (23 Eki 2022 20:53):Multiselect for inbox items would be great so one cloud delete multiple mails at once.Greetings!

[SOGo] Feature Request: Add multiselect to inbox items

["Oliver Enes"]

Multiselect for inbox items would be great so one cloud delete multiple mails 
at once.

Greetings!

Re: [SOGo] Feature-Request: Add UnifiedPush / OpenPush

[Christian Mack]

Hello

This is the user mailinglist, not the support one ;-)

You should open two bug reports at https://bugs.sogo.nu/ with severity 
feature request.

There you can provide all infos needed for each of those interfaces.


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

Am 13.08.22 um 11:47 schrieb "The User" (public-mb@shayan.digital):


Dear Support,

I would be quite happy if you would integrate UnifiedPush in your application 
and (as soon as it is also available) OpenPush. This is an important milestone 
towards independence from the BIG-TECH cloud services like Google and Microsoft.

The community would certainly appreciate this feature!

UnifiedPush:
UnifiedPush is a set of specifications and tools that lets the user choose how 
push notifications* are delivered. All in a free and open source way.
Further information: https://unifiedpush.org/


OpenPush:
The OpenPush project aims to create a free and open source self-hosted 
replacement for Android Push Notifications usually sent through Google's 
proprietary Firebase Cloud Messaging platform. This started as a PrototypeFund 
project. Development is still ongoing.
Further information: https://bubu1.eu/openpush/
​​​
With kind regards,
The User




  




--
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung IT-Dienste Forschung, Lehre, Infrastruktur
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[SOGo] Feature-Request: Add UnifiedPush / OpenPush

["The User"]

Dear Support,

I would be quite happy if you would integrate UnifiedPush in your application 
and (as soon as it is also available) OpenPush. This is an important milestone 
towards independence from the BIG-TECH cloud services like Google and Microsoft.

The community would certainly appreciate this feature!

UnifiedPush:
UnifiedPush is a set of specifications and tools that lets the user choose how 
push notifications* are delivered. All in a free and open source way.
Further information: https://unifiedpush.org/


OpenPush:
The OpenPush project aims to create a free and open source self-hosted 
replacement for Android Push Notifications usually sent through Google's 
proprietary Firebase Cloud Messaging platform. This started as a PrototypeFund 
project. Development is still ongoing.
Further information: https://bubu1.eu/openpush/
​​​
With kind regards,
The User




 

Re: [SOGo] feature request

[an...@schild.ws]

https://www.sogo.nu/bugs/

Am 17.01.2022 um 17:11 schrieb "tim.huge.90" (tim.huge...@protonmail.com):

Hello,

where can I make a feature request?

Best,
Tim
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] feature request

["tim.huge.90"]

Hello,

where can I make a feature request?

Best,
Tim
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] feature request: Jitsi integration

[Lukas Wringer]

Hi,

maybe a bit more abstract implementation for Videocalls or a 
Plugin-System? For us BigBlueButton would be more interesting. And I am 
sure some folks would like to have a Zoom Version.


Greetings Lukas

Am 23.08.21 um 13:20 schrieb Vincent Sneyers - makeITsimple 
(vinc...@makeitsimple.be):

Hello to all,

I had the opportunity to evaluate the Bluemind & Zimbra solutions for a 
client.
I have to admit that I am very happy to use SOGo but I saw something I 
really like about them: the possibility to add a virtual meeting room 
based on Jitsi (this from the webmail and Outlook).
Is this something that could be considered for a future release? Jitsi 
is also an open source project which is very interesting. Linking the 
two would be an asset.


Have a nice day everyone,
Vincent Sneyers

--

Vincent Sneyers - makeITsimple
https://www.makeitsimple.be

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists


--
Lukas Wringer

Universität Augsburg
Rechenzentrum
Service & Support
86135 Augsburg



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[SOGo] feature request: Jitsi integration

[Vincent Sneyers - makeITsimple]

Hello to all,

I had the opportunity to evaluate the Bluemind & Zimbra solutions for a 
client.
I have to admit that I am very happy to use SOGo but I saw something I 
really like about them: the possibility to add a virtual meeting room 
based on Jitsi (this from the webmail and Outlook).
Is this something that could be considered for a future release? Jitsi 
is also an open source project which is very interesting. Linking the 
two would be an asset.


Have a nice day everyone,
Vincent Sneyers

--

Vincent Sneyers - makeITsimple
https://www.makeitsimple.be

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request

[Christian Mack]

Hello

Am 05.02.2018 um 22:28 schrieb "Tim Korves" (t...@korves.net):
> 
> I'm not sure, if anyone requested this earlier - but it would be a great plus 
> for me, if > SOGo would pick the correct sender address (alias) on answering 
> emails
addressed to one of> the users alias addresses.
> 
> Is this implemented? Is this already requested? Or is it possible to 
> integrate this feature?
> 

This is not yet implemented.
AFAIK there is no such feature request.
As this would need changes in the frontend code, it will probably not
get implemented for SOGo V2.

Feature requests are all in the bug tracker with severity "feature request".
See https://sogo.nu/bugs/

So just open one.

You can sponsor a feature by paying Inverse for it too ;-)


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[SOGo] Feature Request

["Tim Korves"]

Hi there,

I'm not sure, if anyone requested this earlier - but it would be a great plus 
for me, if SOGo would pick the correct sender address (alias) on answering 
emails addressed to one of the users alias addresses.

Is this implemented? Is this already requested? Or is it possible to integrate 
this feature?

Best regards,

Tim

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request: Calendar attachments (EAS v16 capability)

[Christian Mack]

Hello

Some users would use a bomb to clear out weed.
That is no reason to provide them with one ;-)

What you really want is a way to provide some webDAV based storage,
where attachment files would automatically be stored, when added via
SOGo events.
And it would have to use the calendar owners credentials for storage,
and set the privileges for the people with read/write permissions
automatically.
It would have to be configurable by the admin (can be disabled, set to
single storage or set to storage based on LDAP attribute).

With that you would only have a link in the event and the user thinks,
he has it added to the event.

BTW:
This could also be used for emails.
But most mail clients would not support sending that way.

You can always open a feature request at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs or add
yourself to an existing one.


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

Am 27.02.2017 um 08:46 schrieb Lars Eriksson (lars.eriks...@wintech.se):
> Hello.
> 
> That is true, I personally do not want that. But im not the only user
> here, and a lot of my colleagues have earlier worked in
> Exchange-enviroments and they do in fact have used and use the option to
> have attachments to their calendar events.
> 
> Google Calendar also support attatched files to calendar events.
> People do in fact use this, believe it or not.
> 
> Vänliga hälsningar / Best regards
> 
> *Lars Eriksson*
> 
> Den 2017-02-24 kl. 15:25, skrev Christian Mack
> (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de):
>> Am 17.02.2017 um 08:47 schrieb Lars Eriksson (lars.eriks...@wintech.se):
>>> A function commonly used in the MS office/Exchange-world is attaching
>>> files to a calendar event.
>>> This capability was added in Microsofts version 16 of Exchange
>>> ActiveSync, and it would be very good to have in SOGo as well.
>>>
>>> Since attaching files is not supported by Thunderbird, an early step
>>> could be to support only WebbUI and Outlook.
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoted from Microsoft dev blog:
>>> -
>>> "Updated EAS, which we will call version 16, contains three new major
>>> capabilities[...]
>>> [...]
>>> 2. Calendar attachments. Previously calendar items synced with EAS could
>>> not include any attachments such as agendas, decks or spreadsheets. In
>>> version 16 that is now possible."
>>> -
>>
>> You do not want that.
>> Because you always have to upload those to all clients using that
>> calendar on every change of that event or the document.
>> And old documents will stay till the corresponding event is deleted.
>> Think of mobiles!
>> They do neither have the bandwidth nor the space.
>>
>> The better approach is to store the documents in a central place
>> (NextCloud, Alfresco etc.) and add a link to the event.
>>
>> This was requested before, see
>> https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1758
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Christian Mack
> 


-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request: Calendar attachments (EAS v16 capability)

[Lars Eriksson]

Hello.

That is true, I personally do not want that. But im not the only user 
here, and a lot of my colleagues have earlier worked in 
Exchange-enviroments and they do in fact have used and use the option to 
have attachments to their calendar events.


Google Calendar also support attatched files to calendar events.
People do in fact use this, believe it or not.

Vänliga hälsningar / Best regards

*Lars Eriksson*

Den 2017-02-24 kl. 15:25, skrev Christian Mack 
(christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de):

Am 17.02.2017 um 08:47 schrieb Lars Eriksson (lars.eriks...@wintech.se):

A function commonly used in the MS office/Exchange-world is attaching
files to a calendar event.
This capability was added in Microsofts version 16 of Exchange
ActiveSync, and it would be very good to have in SOGo as well.

Since attaching files is not supported by Thunderbird, an early step
could be to support only WebbUI and Outlook.


Quoted from Microsoft dev blog:
-
"Updated EAS, which we will call version 16, contains three new major
capabilities[...]
[...]
2. Calendar attachments. Previously calendar items synced with EAS could
not include any attachments such as agendas, decks or spreadsheets. In
version 16 that is now possible."
-


You do not want that.
Because you always have to upload those to all clients using that
calendar on every change of that event or the document.
And old documents will stay till the corresponding event is deleted.
Think of mobiles!
They do neither have the bandwidth nor the space.

The better approach is to store the documents in a central place
(NextCloud, Alfresco etc.) and add a link to the event.

This was requested before, see
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1758


Kind regards,
Christian Mack


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request: Calendar attachments (EAS v16 capability)

[Christian Mack]

Am 17.02.2017 um 08:47 schrieb Lars Eriksson (lars.eriks...@wintech.se):
> A function commonly used in the MS office/Exchange-world is attaching
> files to a calendar event.
> This capability was added in Microsofts version 16 of Exchange
> ActiveSync, and it would be very good to have in SOGo as well.
> 
> Since attaching files is not supported by Thunderbird, an early step
> could be to support only WebbUI and Outlook.
> 
> 
> Quoted from Microsoft dev blog:
> -
> "Updated EAS, which we will call version 16, contains three new major
> capabilities[...]
> [...]
> 2. Calendar attachments. Previously calendar items synced with EAS could
> not include any attachments such as agendas, decks or spreadsheets. In
> version 16 that is now possible."
> -


You do not want that.
Because you always have to upload those to all clients using that
calendar on every change of that event or the document.
And old documents will stay till the corresponding event is deleted.
Think of mobiles!
They do neither have the bandwidth nor the space.

The better approach is to store the documents in a central place
(NextCloud, Alfresco etc.) and add a link to the event.

This was requested before, see
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1758


Kind regards,
Christian Mack
-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[SOGo] Feature Request: Calendar attachments (EAS v16 capability)

[Lars Eriksson]

A function commonly used in the MS office/Exchange-world is attaching 
files to a calendar event.
This capability was added in Microsofts version 16 of Exchange 
ActiveSync, and it would be very good to have in SOGo as well.


Since attaching files is not supported by Thunderbird, an early step 
could be to support only WebbUI and Outlook.



Quoted from Microsoft dev blog:
-
"Updated EAS, which we will call version 16, contains three new major 
capabilities[...]

[...]
2. Calendar attachments. Previously calendar items synced with EAS could 
not include any attachments such as agendas, decks or spreadsheets. In 
version 16 that is now possible."

-
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request

[Chris Coleman]

Letting a user upload their own profile picture, resize it, crop it, and 
save it, from inside SOGo, would be great.


Gravatar doesn't work for the EU, the privacy laws in the EU ban 
Gravatar because Gravatar logs user IP, email and geographical location, 
which isn't allowed by EU internet privacy regulations, so a feature to 
allow you to disable Gravatar had to be added to SOGo, see here: 
https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3600


SOGo should probably save the user photo to the LDAP directory, or 
Active Directory, in the attributes "jpegPhoto" and "thumbnailPhoto".


Here's a PERL script to let you save your own JPEG photo to your user 
entry in LDAP.


http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/GBARR/perl-ldap-0.39/contrib/jpegLoad.pl

It's available in the PERL package "perl-jpeg", install it by doing:

# cpan install /perl-jpeg/

Leaving it as an exercise to connect "jpegLoad.pl" to SOGo for the 
purpose of letting users upload their own profile picture.


More information:

* jpegPhoto: "This attribute is used to store one or more images of a 
person using the JPEG File Interchange Format" - no maximum size, yet 
probably SOGo should reduce size until less than 100KB.


https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc221100.aspx

* thumbnailPhoto: "Picture" - maximum size 102400. Attribute field is 
created when Exchange is installed to the domain, or schema for 
ActiveDirectory is updated to 2008 R2.


https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc221395.aspx


On 2/15/2017 3:07 PM, "Ivan Gonzalez" (iva...@nocroom.com) wrote:

Correct, not many users use it would be nice to see option to upload your own

Ivan Gonzalez Jr. x101
NocRoom | ceo | e: iva...@nocroom.com w: NocRoom.com
West Coast/Las Vegas 702-789-0409 | East Coast/Miami 786-802-7666 [ social tw | 
fb | in | g+ ]

Turnkey Solution | Virtualization Kings – Dedicated Servers – Cloud Email 
Servers – Cloud PBX Hosted Systems - Bitcoin ok

All emails from NocRoom.com are encrypted

IMPORTANT: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If the reader is not the intended recipient, please notify us 
immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message from your e-mail 
system. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 
strictly prohibited. This correspondence is being transmitted for informational 
purposes only and the views, opinions and any electronic signatures of the 
sender are not intended to bind NocRoom LLC.​

-Original Message-
From: users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] On Behalf Of 
Guillaume ANDRÉ
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:12 AM
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: RE: [SOGo] Feature Request

If I'm not mistaken, any Gravatar associated with your email address should 
show up in SOGO. And of course it works others across different domains. Quite 
a nice feature.

Cheers,
Guillaume

-Message d'origine-
De : users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] De la part de Grouchy 
Sysadmin Envoyé : mardi 14 février 2017 17:18 À : users@sogo.nu Objet : Re: 
[SOGo] Feature Request


Quoting Ivan Gonzalez <users@sogo.nu>:


I will love to see this on sogo

1.  Allow users to “upload” their own photo image (admin panel on/off)
2.  Live Chat with users within the same domain, see who is online
(admin on/off)


For chat, check out https://www.jsxc.org/installation.html. They have a Sogo 
plugin.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists



--
---
Chris Coleman
Espace LLC
860-576-9526

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

RE: [SOGo] Feature Request

["Ivan Gonzalez"]

Correct, not many users use it would be nice to see option to upload your own

Ivan Gonzalez Jr. x101
NocRoom | ceo | e: iva...@nocroom.com w: NocRoom.com 
West Coast/Las Vegas 702-789-0409 | East Coast/Miami 786-802-7666 [ social tw | 
fb | in | g+ ]

Turnkey Solution | Virtualization Kings – Dedicated Servers – Cloud Email 
Servers – Cloud PBX Hosted Systems - Bitcoin ok

All emails from NocRoom.com are encrypted

IMPORTANT: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If the reader is not the intended recipient, please notify us 
immediately by return e-mail and delete the original message from your e-mail 
system. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 
strictly prohibited. This correspondence is being transmitted for informational 
purposes only and the views, opinions and any electronic signatures of the 
sender are not intended to bind NocRoom LLC.​

-Original Message-
From: users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] On Behalf Of 
Guillaume ANDRÉ
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 8:12 AM
To: users@sogo.nu
Subject: RE: [SOGo] Feature Request

If I'm not mistaken, any Gravatar associated with your email address should 
show up in SOGO. And of course it works others across different domains. Quite 
a nice feature.

Cheers,
Guillaume

-Message d'origine-
De : users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] De la part de Grouchy 
Sysadmin Envoyé : mardi 14 février 2017 17:18 À : users@sogo.nu Objet : Re: 
[SOGo] Feature Request


Quoting Ivan Gonzalez <users@sogo.nu>:

> I will love to see this on sogo
>
> 1.Allow users to “upload” their own photo image (admin panel on/off)
> 2.Live Chat with users within the same domain, see who is online  
> (admin on/off)
>

For chat, check out https://www.jsxc.org/installation.html. They have a Sogo 
plugin.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

RE: [SOGo] Feature Request

[m...@guillaumea.fr]

If I'm not mistaken, any Gravatar associated with your email address should 
show up in SOGO. And of course it works others across different domains. Quite 
a nice feature.

Cheers,
Guillaume

-Message d'origine-
De : users-requ...@sogo.nu [mailto:users-requ...@sogo.nu] De la part de Grouchy 
Sysadmin
Envoyé : mardi 14 février 2017 17:18
À : users@sogo.nu
Objet : Re: [SOGo] Feature Request


Quoting Ivan Gonzalez <users@sogo.nu>:

> I will love to see this on sogo
>
> 1.Allow users to “upload” their own photo image (admin panel on/off)
> 2.Live Chat with users within the same domain, see who is online  
> (admin on/off)
>

For chat, check out https://www.jsxc.org/installation.html. They have a Sogo 
plugin.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request

[Grouchy Sysadmin]

Quoting Ivan Gonzalez :


I will love to see this on sogo

1.  Allow users to “upload” their own photo image (admin panel on/off)
2.	Live Chat with users within the same domain, see who is online  
(admin on/off)




For chat, check out https://www.jsxc.org/installation.html. They have  
a Sogo plugin.


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request - sync of Drafts folder with iOS clients connected with Exchange

[Christoph Kuhnert | YNA]

Good Morning

I looked for a place to make a feature request and think that the way to do it 
is via the mailing list, right?

I would like to propose to look into making it possible with SOGo to sync the 
Drafts folder of iOS clients connected, which are connected with Exchange.
I hope this makes sense for many oter users as well.

If I should place this feature request somewhere else, then please advise.

Kind Regards

Chris






-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request: Precedence header for Notification emails

[Chris Coleman]

This is a feature request (maybe a bug fix depending on how you look at 
it), to improve the Notifications.


In Google's Bulk Senders Guidelines, they mention:

"Messages should indicate that they are bulk mail, using the 'Precedence: bulk' 
header field."

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126?hl=en

This triggers Google's Smart Labels feature to label the messages as 
bulk. Because SOGo currently fails to label bulk emails with this 
header, it's more likely that Google will send SOGo's Notification 
messages to the recipient's Spam folder.


The solution: You need to add a new field in the Notification messages 
headers:


Precedence: bulk

Reference: RFC3834, http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc3834


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] feature request sogo

[Chris]

On 5/19/2016 9:35 PM, Tamer Higazi (th9...@googlemail.com) wrote:

Hi people,
Sogo is getting to be better, and better and better. Cool stuff you are
doing.

What I see at sogo is that it checks via gravatar the images which I
think is pretty cool.

What I figured out, that sogo checks only the primary address if a
gravatar is set. Would be also wonderfull if it would check the
secondary Email if the primary mailaddress has no picture (gravatar) set

What to be wonderful would be, that there is an option somewhere to
check/add, if all the pictures (or computer generated ones) would be
stored permanently in the vcards, so that if somebody makes a sync those
are being transfered as well to the clients (tablets, smartphone.)




best, Tamer


+1 to save the gravatar contact profile pic into the vcard + carddav 
sync those vcards to phone = phone contacts effortlessly get the contact 
pics.


Other public user profile sources should be used as fallback in case the 
attempt to retrieve the gravatar contact profile pics fails or doesn't 
exist.


Only some of my contacts have gravatar profile pics.

When you query multiple contact pic sources, probably 90-99% contacts 
have at least one social network profile pic.


With free code and contact email address it's possible to get

LinkedIn public pic of your linkedin contacts http://pastebin.com/xb81YdL7
google plus profile pic,
facebook profile pic,
RFC image embedded in the "face" header field of the email,
RFC image embedded in the AD/OpenLDAP directory.


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] feature request sogo

[Tamer Higazi]

Hi people,
Sogo is getting to be better, and better and better. Cool stuff you are
doing.

What I see at sogo is that it checks via gravatar the images which I
think is pretty cool.

What I figured out, that sogo checks only the primary address if a
gravatar is set. Would be also wonderfull if it would check the
secondary Email if the primary mailaddress has no picture (gravatar) set

What to be wonderful would be, that there is an option somewhere to
check/add, if all the pictures (or computer generated ones) would be
stored permanently in the vcards, so that if somebody makes a sync those
are being transfered as well to the clients (tablets, smartphone.)




best, Tamer
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request: Order/Sort/Presentation calendar allday events

[blackj...@gmx.net]

http://fs5.directupload.net/images/160404/cbhfa6ri.jpg

Sort:
Improve sorting for allday events.
alphabetical and/or numeric || numeric and/or Alphabetical and/or numeric

Order:
Maybe one allday event per line over 7 Days (Mo.-Su.)?
If there are two Events (Event01 Mo.-We. and Event02 Thur.-Sun.). They could
exist in one line?

Presentation:
Maybe a continuous bar per allday event?
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: add selected to list in Address Book

[Peter B]

Done, thanks Christian.

On 01/03/2016 10:48, Christian Mack wrote:

Am 29.02.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Peter B:

A feature request: in an address book it would be great to add a "Create
list/Add to existing" button/menu option to the selection bar for
selected addresses in the address book list.

This would greatly simplify creating large groups (20+ members),
especially on mobile devices where typing is a pita.

Thoughts?


Add it as Feature request at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs


Kind regards,
Christian Mack



--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: add selected to list in Address Book

[Christian Mack]

Am 29.02.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Peter B:
> A feature request: in an address book it would be great to add a "Create
> list/Add to existing" button/menu option to the selection bar for
> selected addresses in the address book list.
> 
> This would greatly simplify creating large groups (20+ members),
> especially on mobile devices where typing is a pita.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Add it as Feature request at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[SOGo] Feature request: add selected to list in Address Book

[Peter B]

A feature request: in an address book it would be great to add a "Create 
list/Add to existing" button/menu option to the selection bar for 
selected addresses in the address book list.


This would greatly simplify creating large groups (20+ members), 
especially on mobile devices where typing is a pita.


Thoughts?

Peter.
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: LDAP addressbook integration

[Johannes Franken]

Hello Christian,

* Christian Mack  [2015-09-08 18:32 +0200]:
> > not by drag from a SQL address book:
> If you need this function, you should open an enhancement request at
>
> > the context menu items 'Loeschen' (delete) and 'Verschieben in' (move) are 
> > greyed out.
> This should work (and is a frontend bug).

Thanks for confirming.

Issues reported:
- Drag to LDAP: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3341
- LDAP contact context menu: http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3342

Regards,

-- 
Johannes Franken
 
Professional unix/network development
mailto:jfran...@jfranken.de
http://www.jfranken.de/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: LDAP addressbook integration

[Christian Mack]

Am 07.09.2015 um 17:07 schrieb Johannes Franken:
> Christian,
> 
> * Christian Mack  [2015-09-07 16:07 +0200]:
>>> 2.) in the web frontend, drag from SQL *to* LDAP addressbooks does
>>> not work. It is able to copy *from* LDAP, though.
>> You need write access to the LDAP for that.
>> Check option "modifiers" in SOGoUserSources.
> 
> Yes, I am member of modifiers.
> SOGo can create, edit and delete existing records in LDAP, but
> 
> a.) not by drag from a SQL address book:
> the mouse pointer soes not snap in over the LDAP addressbook.
> 

I see.
If you need this function, you should open an enhancement request at
http://www.sogo.nu/bugs

But I assume this change will not happen before Version 3.0 is out.

> I don't think it's only a frontend issue, because
> b.) when I right click on any LDAP contact,
> the context menu items 'Loeschen' (delete) and 'Verschieben in' (move) are 
> greyed out.
> The big 'Loeschen' (delete) button on top does delete the LDAP concact anyway.
> 

This should work (and is a frontend bug).
Please open a bug report at http://www.sogo.nu/bugs


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Universität Konstanz
Kommunikations-, Informations-, Medienzentrum (KIM)
Abteilung Basisdienste
78457 Konstanz
+49 7531 88-4416



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: central signature distribution

[Szládovics Péter]

2014-02-09 22:55 keltezéssel, ABBAS Alain írta:
There is a good How to to make a signature by user with amavisd + 
Altermime

http://serverfault.com/questions/401900/amavis-atermime-dynamic-email-signatures-disclaimers


Yes, of course, but if you use digital signatures on your client side, 
it will broken all of your outgoing mail security, cos it makes 
modification on the mail body after it's signed.
In my opinion this is the worst thing ever of the world - if you use 
digital signatures.


If you don't use smime, this can be good, but in corporate environment 
usually need to use digital signatures and/or encryption.

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: central signature distribution

[ABBAS Alain]

There is a good How to to make a signature by user with amavisd + Altermime
http://serverfault.com/questions/401900/amavis-atermime-dynamic-email-signatures-disclaimers



Le Samedi 8 Février 2014 22:46 CET, Szládovics Péter p...@szladovics.hu a 
écrit:
  2014-02-08 15:23 keltezéssel, T.B. írta:Hi,

I'd like to discuss a feature request regarding a central mail-signature 
distribution for SOGo web interface, Thunderbird (with SOGo Integrator) and 
Outlook.
Which Outlook feature is support the getting signatures from a server?
 Some people may ask, why would you do that?
Short answer: The uniform appearance is a matter of Corporate Identity, which 
is very important for many companies. And it simplifies admins job, too.
Some companies even use mail signatures for advertisement or announcements 
(e.g. new products, exhibitions, ...).
In many countries companies are forced by law that their e-mails and their 
business letters contain legal information about the company like CEO, members 
of the board, address, tax-ID, Commercial Register Number, legal entity number 
and so on.
Therefore a central management is necessary.
I don't think so... Is Exchange support it?
What will about the attached mailboxes, on behalf functions, etc. ? When we 
send any email in name of the other people, which signature will we need to use?
 To explain how this could work, let me introduce the discontinued freeware 
Outlook Signature:
Outlook Signature is an Windows executable which is executed by the 
user-logon-script.
It takes templates, fills in custom user data (name, phone nr., mail address, 
job title, ...) and places the signature files in the appropriate location 
where Outlook expects them. Even if the user is allowed to change the 
signatures, they will get overwritten by the logon script at next boot.
See above.
Or I didn't understand this mail...
 --
Szládovics, Péter

Onlinedemo.HU
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
--
Alain Abbas
11 rue Robert Schumann
54500 Vandoeuvre
Tel : +333 83 18 02 70
skype: alain.abbas-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request: central signature distribution

[T.B.]

Hi,

I'd like to discuss a feature request regarding a central mail-signature 
distribution for SOGo web interface, Thunderbird (with SOGo Integrator) 
and Outlook.

Some people may ask, why would you do that?
Short answer: The uniform appearance is a matter of Corporate 
Identity, which is very important for many companies. And it simplifies 
admins job, too.
Some companies even use mail signatures for advertisement or 
announcements (e.g. new products, exhibitions, ...).
In many countries companies are forced by law that their e-mails and 
their business letters contain legal information about the company like 
CEO, members of the board, address, tax-ID, Commercial Register Number, 
legal entity number and so on.

Therefore a central management is necessary.
And for Inverse, it's an sales argument.


To explain how this could work, let me introduce the discontinued 
freeware Outlook Signature:
Outlook Signature is an Windows executable which is executed by the 
user-logon-script.
It takes templates, fills in custom user data (name, phone nr., mail 
address, job title, ...) and places the signature files in the 
appropriate location where Outlook expects them. Even if the user is 
allowed to change the signatures, they will get overwritten by the logon 
script at next boot.



Feature list:
Generate any number of signatures based on custom templates (HTM, RTF 
and TXT),

Use of data from any database source,
Using data from the Active Directory in a Windows Server environment (+ 
LDAP),

Automatic distribution of all signature files,
Automatic setting of Outlook signature options,
Set different signatures for new messages and for replies,
Support for Outlook 2000, XP, 2003, 2007,
Automatic detection of the version of Outlook,
Central configuration via INI file (s),
Debug mode

Old Website:

German (from Internet Archive):
https://web.archive.org/web/20130224064509/http://zerbit.de/projekte/outlooksignature.aspx

Google Translate English (from Internet Archive):
http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=desl=detl=enu=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20130224064509%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fzerbit.de%2Fprojekte%2Foutlooksignature.aspx 



The download is still available from the Internet Archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130224064509/http://zerbit.de/download/outlooksignature1902.zip

---

For SOGo this could be designed as follows:

An SOGo administrator creates signature templates (HTM, RTF and TXT) and 
saves them preferably to a database.
SOGo server provides a service where Thunderbird Integrator and an 
possible executable like Outlook Signature gets the updated 
signatures. This service should fill in the data from the databases into 
the templates - server side! Therefore the user source database should 
get extended.
Maybe there could be a additional possibility that an user can edit 
specific data fields for his signature in the Web Interface and 
Thunderbird Integrator - controlled by ACLs.
Or a mechanism where a user can make an direct request (not by e-mail) 
to the admin to change specific fields like job title or phone number.


Currently we are using different signatures for people with and without 
mobile phone numbers. The sales people also use different signatures.

But not every user should be able to use every available signature.



What do other people here and at Inverse think about this?

Kind regards

T.B.
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: central signature distribution

[Davor Vusir]

** Skickat från mobilusken! **
Den 8 feb 2014 15:37 skrev T.B. t.b.mailingli...@igeno-fat.de:

 Hi,

 I'd like to discuss a feature request regarding a central mail-signature
distribution for SOGo web interface, Thunderbird (with SOGo Integrator) and
Outlook.
 Some people may ask, why would you do that?
 Short answer: The uniform appearance is a matter of Corporate Identity,
which is very important for many companies. And it simplifies admins job,
too.
 Some companies even use mail signatures for advertisement or
announcements (e.g. new products, exhibitions, ...).
 In many countries companies are forced by law that their e-mails and
their business letters contain legal information about the company like
CEO, members of the board, address, tax-ID, Commercial Register Number,
legal entity number and so on.
 Therefore a central management is necessary.
 And for Inverse, it's an sales argument.


 To explain how this could work, let me introduce the discontinued
freeware Outlook Signature:
 Outlook Signature is an Windows executable which is executed by the
user-logon-script.
 It takes templates, fills in custom user data (name, phone nr., mail
address, job title, ...) and places the signature files in the appropriate
location where Outlook expects them. Even if the user is allowed to change
the signatures, they will get overwritten by the logon script at next boot.


 Feature list:
 Generate any number of signatures based on custom templates (HTM, RTF and
TXT),
 Use of data from any database source,
 Using data from the Active Directory in a Windows Server environment (+
LDAP),
 Automatic distribution of all signature files,
 Automatic setting of Outlook signature options,
 Set different signatures for new messages and for replies,
 Support for Outlook 2000, XP, 2003, 2007,
 Automatic detection of the version of Outlook,
 Central configuration via INI file (s),
 Debug mode

 Old Website:

 German (from Internet Archive):

https://web.archive.org/web/20130224064509/http://zerbit.de/projekte/outlooksignature.aspx

 Google Translate English (from Internet Archive):

http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=desl=detl=enu=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20130224064509%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fzerbit.de%2Fprojekte%2Foutlooksignature.aspx

 The download is still available from the Internet Archive:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130224064509/http://zerbit.de/download/outlooksignature1902.zip

 ---

 For SOGo this could be designed as follows:

 An SOGo administrator creates signature templates (HTM, RTF and TXT) and
saves them preferably to a database.
 SOGo server provides a service where Thunderbird Integrator and an
possible executable like Outlook Signature gets the updated signatures.
This service should fill in the data from the databases into the templates
- server side! Therefore the user source database should get extended.
 Maybe there could be a additional possibility that an user can edit
specific data fields for his signature in the Web Interface and Thunderbird
Integrator - controlled by ACLs.
 Or a mechanism where a user can make an direct request (not by e-mail) to
the admin to change specific fields like job title or phone number.

 Currently we are using different signatures for people with and without
mobile phone numbers. The sales people also use different signatures.
 But not every user should be able to use every available signature.

 

 What do other people here and at Inverse think about this?

 Kind regards

 T.B.
 --
 users@sogo.nu
 https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

+1
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request: central signature distribution

[Szládovics Péter]

2014-02-08 15:23 keltezéssel, T.B. írta:

Hi,

I'd like to discuss a feature request regarding a central 
mail-signature distribution for SOGo web interface, Thunderbird (with 
SOGo Integrator) and Outlook.


Which Outlook feature is support the getting signatures from a server?


Some people may ask, why would you do that?
Short answer: The uniform appearance is a matter of Corporate 
Identity, which is very important for many companies. And it 
simplifies admins job, too.
Some companies even use mail signatures for advertisement or 
announcements (e.g. new products, exhibitions, ...).
In many countries companies are forced by law that their e-mails and 
their business letters contain legal information about the company 
like CEO, members of the board, address, tax-ID, Commercial Register 
Number, legal entity number and so on.

Therefore a central management is necessary.


I don't think so... Is Exchange support it?
What will about the attached mailboxes, on behalf functions, etc. ? When 
we send any email in name of the other people, which signature will we 
need to use?


To explain how this could work, let me introduce the discontinued 
freeware Outlook Signature:
Outlook Signature is an Windows executable which is executed by the 
user-logon-script.
It takes templates, fills in custom user data (name, phone nr., mail 
address, job title, ...) and places the signature files in the 
appropriate location where Outlook expects them. Even if the user is 
allowed to change the signatures, they will get overwritten by the 
logon script at next boot.


See above.
Or I didn't understand this mail...

--
Szládovics, Péter

Onlinedemo.HU http://www.onlinedemo.hu
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
/Arthur C. Clarke/
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request

[Christian Mack]

Hello Szládovics Péter

Am 2013-09-29 00:22, schrieb Szládovics Péter:
 Dear Guys@Inverse,
 
 I often use multiple alerts in calendar events through my mobile
 calendar app and/or through Thunderbird Lightning. This feature is
 working fine.
 But I've just wondering - handling multiple alarms not possible on WebUI...
 
 So, I can't create/modify the alarm times on the web, just the first one
 (creation order, not the chronological).
 Will it be possible handling this feature at the releases later? I think
 it is a useful thing in the calendar.
 

Did you open a feature request for this?


Kind regards,
Christian Mack

-- 
Christian Mack
Gruppe Informationsdienste
Rechenzentrum Universität Konstanz
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request

[Szládovics Péter]

2013-12-10 16:19 keltezéssel, Christian Mack írta:

Hello Szládovics Péter

Am 2013-09-29 00:22, schrieb Szládovics Péter:

Dear Guys@Inverse,

I often use multiple alerts in calendar events through my mobile
calendar app and/or through Thunderbird Lightning. This feature is
working fine.
But I've just wondering - handling multiple alarms not possible on WebUI...

So, I can't create/modify the alarm times on the web, just the first one
(creation order, not the chronological).
Will it be possible handling this feature at the releases later? I think
it is a useful thing in the calendar.



Did you open a feature request for this?


I think yes, but not sure :)
I filled the feature request form on the site, but the request not in 
the http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/ page.

So, I don't know what happened :)
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request

[Szládovics Péter]

Dear Guys@Inverse,

I often use multiple alerts in calendar events through my mobile 
calendar app and/or through Thunderbird Lightning. This feature is 
working fine.

But I've just wondering - handling multiple alarms not possible on WebUI...

So, I can't create/modify the alarm times on the web, just the first one 
(creation order, not the chronological).
Will it be possible handling this feature at the releases later? I think 
it is a useful thing in the calendar.


Thanks,

--
Szládovics, Péter

Onlinedemo.HU http://www.onlinedemo.hu
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
/Arthur C. Clarke/
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature Request

[Odhiambo Washington]

The documentation says SOGoLoginDomains parameter used to define which
domains should
be selectable from the login page. This parameter is an array of keys from
the domains dictionary.

In a situation of single or even multiple domains, I'd love to have a user
only input their username and then select the domain. Sogo should then
concat username and domain in the form username@domain and present this to
the IMAP server as the uid for login.

I run a system of virtual domains where users are required to login with
username@domain.
At the moment, even if I enable SOGoLoginDomains, I still have to enter the
whole username@domain on the webUI in order to login. This makes the domain
selection useless.

Unless I am missing a config for SOGo to achieve the above, I'd love to get
the feature.



-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.
-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request. SOLVED

[Hans de Groot]

Okay, sorry about my feature request. The solution is already there.

For people using mysql authentication the solution from Francis works. I did not try it because I thought it only works in multi domain mode, but I added it and now only the users of teh same domain show up.

Thanks for the tip Francis.

If I every try the LDAP auhtentication I will try youy solution Nathanael.

Regards

Hans




On Friday, June 15, 2012 14:13 CEST, Francis Lachapelle flachape...@inverse.ca wrote:


	Hi Hans
	
	On 2012-06-15, at 6:40 AM, Hans de Groot wrote:
	
	 I have a feature request. (I hope I post this in the right place)
	
	 I would like to have a configuration option that when set, lets the calendar/contacts sharing menu only show/search email adresses in the same domain.
	 IE: if I am logged in with ha...@dandy.nl I can only share with users in the dandy.nl domain. I do not want my users to see all email adresses in the system.
	
	 Why do I want this?
	
	 I like to deploy SOGo once and never have to look at it again. So when I add a new mail domain to my system SOGo automatically works with it.
	 It does this allready except when using the share calendar/contacts part. Here users are shown all existing email accounts/users on the system.
	 I know I can use SOGo with multiple virtual hosts but this way I have to add this to the SOGo config (and remove it later) and restart SOGo everytime a domain gets added or removed.
	
	Is your authentication source SQL or LDAP-based? If you use LDAP, consider Nathanaels solution. With an SQL source, you can dynamically associate users to a domain using the DomainFieldName parameter. The value must be the column name that corresponds to the user domain.
	
	 If this is to much work than maybe a quicker solution would be to have an option to disable the search function when sharing calendars.
	 Users just have to type the complete email address of the user they want to share the calender with.
	 It will start in red and turn blue when it matches.
	
	 I hope you will look into this. I think it will add a lot power to SOGo.
	
	--
	flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca
	Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org)
	
	--
	users@sogo.nu
	https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request.

[Jason Wohlford]

I'm doing this with LDAP filters in the SOGo config. Notice the filter 
attribute with the specific gidNumber. See below:

wohlfordcompany.com = {
  SOGoMailDomain = wohlfordcompany.com;
  SOGoUserSources = (
{
  type = ldap;
  id = wohlfordcompany.com;
  CNFieldName = cn;
  IDFieldName = mail;
  UIDFieldName = mail;
  bindFields = ( mail );
  IMAPLoginFieldName = mail;
  baseDN = ou=users,dc=montgomery,dc=al;
  filter = (objectClass=posixAccount)(gidNumber=2015);
  bindAsCurrentUser = YES;
  hostname = localhost;
  port = 389;
  canAuthenticate = YES;
  isAddressBook = YES;
  displayName = Directory;
}
  );
};

On Jun 15, 2012, at 5:40 AM, Hans de Groot wrote:

 Hi,

 I have a feature request. (I hope I post this in the right place)
  
 I would like to have a configuration option that when set, lets the 
 calendar/contacts sharing menu only show/search email adresses in the same 
 domain.
 IE: if I am logged in with ha...@dandy.nl I can only share with users in the 
 dandy.nl domain. I do not want my users to see all email adresses in the 
 system.
  
 Why do I want this?
  
 I like to deploy SOGo once and never have to look at it again. So when I add 
 a new mail domain to my system SOGo automatically works with it.
 It does this allready except when using the share calendar/contacts part. 
 Here users are shown all existing email accounts/users on the system.
 I know I can use SOGo with multiple virtual hosts but this way I have to add 
 this to the SOGo config (and remove it later) and restart SOGo everytime a 
 domain gets added or removed.
  
 If this is to much work than maybe a quicker solution would be to have an 
 option to disable the search function when sharing calendars.
 Users just have to type the complete email address of the user they want to 
 share the calender with.
 It will start in red and turn blue when it matches. 
  
 I hope you will look into this. I think it will add a lot power to SOGo.
 
 Regards
 
 Hans de Groot
  


-- 
Jason Wohlford
ja...@wohlfordcompany.com
http://www.wohlfordcompany.com/
334.322.1491

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request.

[Hans de Groot]

	Hi,

	 

	I have a feature request. (I hope I post this in the right place)

	

	I would like to have a configuration option that when set, lets the calendar/contacts sharing menu only show/search email adresses in the same domain.

	IE: if I am logged in with ha...@dandy.nl I can only share with users in the dandy.nl domain. I do not want my users to see all email adresses in the system.

	

	Why do I want this?

	

	I like to deploy SOGo once and never have to look at it again. So when I add a new mail domain to my system SOGo automatically works with it.

	It does this allready except when using the share calendar/contacts part. Here users are shown all existing email accounts/users on the system.

	I know I can use SOGo with multiple virtual hosts but this way I have to add this to the SOGo config (and remove it later) and restart SOGo everytime a domain gets added or removed.

	

	If this is to much work than maybe a quicker solution would be to have an option to disable the search function when sharing calendars.

	Users just have to type the complete email address of the user they want to share the calender with.

	It will start in red and turn blue when it matches.

	

	I hope you will look into this. I think it will add a lot power to SOGo.
	
	Regards
	
	Hans de Groot
	

Re: [SOGo] Feature request.

[Nathanael Bettridge]

Hi Hans,

We're doing something like this with our SOGo implementation using LDAP 
permissions, to let us auto-provision new domains in SOGo


Our openldap is set up so users can only see objects within their own 
domain's OU (so something like 
DC=com,DC=example,OU=whateverclientdomain.com,...) , and we use the 
bindAsCurrentUser setting on the LDAP authentication source to ensure 
that SOGo searches the ldap directory using the currently logged in user 
credentials (whereas by default, it uses global credentials). So users 
only see what they have permissions to see, and the permissions masks 
mean they can only see their own domain :)


It works pretty well. Occassionally regressions creep in with new 
releases, but the Inverse team are brilliant about fixing them :)


It also means that users see the exact same results when looking at the 
address book with LDAP directly (most desktop mail clients) vs with 
SOGo/Thunderbird


Of course if you're using an SQL auth source this doesn't really help 
you :)


Thanks,

-Nathanael Bettridge



Hans de Groot wrote:

Hi,
I have a feature request. (I hope I post this in the right place)
I would like to have a configuration option that when set, lets the 
calendar/contacts sharing menu only show/search email adresses in the 
same domain.
IE: if I am logged in with ha...@dandy.nl I can only share with users 
in the dandy.nl domain. I do not want my users to see all email 
adresses in the system.

Why do I want this?
I like to deploy SOGo once and never have to look at it again. So when 
I add a new mail domain to my system SOGo automatically works with it.
It does this allready except when using the share calendar/contacts 
part. Here users are shown all existing email accounts/users on the 
system.
I know I can use SOGo with multiple virtual hosts but this way I have 
to add this to the SOGo config (and remove it later) and restart SOGo 
everytime a domain gets added or removed.
If this is to much work than maybe a quicker solution would be to have 
an option to disable the search function when sharing calendars.
Users just have to type the complete email address of the user they 
want to share the calender with.

It will start in red and turn blue when it matches.
I hope you will look into this. I think it will add a lot power to SOGo.

Regards

Hans de Groot

--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request.

[Francis Lachapelle]

Hi Hans

On 2012-06-15, at 6:40 AM, Hans de Groot wrote:

 I have a feature request. (I hope I post this in the right place)
  
 I would like to have a configuration option that when set, lets the 
 calendar/contacts sharing menu only show/search email adresses in the same 
 domain.
 IE: if I am logged in with ha...@dandy.nl I can only share with users in the 
 dandy.nl domain. I do not want my users to see all email adresses in the 
 system.
  
 Why do I want this?
  
 I like to deploy SOGo once and never have to look at it again. So when I add 
 a new mail domain to my system SOGo automatically works with it.
 It does this allready except when using the share calendar/contacts part. 
 Here users are shown all existing email accounts/users on the system.
 I know I can use SOGo with multiple virtual hosts but this way I have to add 
 this to the SOGo config (and remove it later) and restart SOGo everytime a 
 domain gets added or removed.

Is your authentication source SQL or LDAP-based? If you use LDAP, consider 
Nathanael's solution. With an SQL source, you can dynamically associate users 
to a domain using the DomainFieldName parameter. The value must be the column 
name that corresponds to the user domain.

  If this is to much work than maybe a quicker solution would be to have an 
 option to disable the search function when sharing calendars.
 Users just have to type the complete email address of the user they want to 
 share the calender with.
 It will start in red and turn blue when it matches. 
  
 I hope you will look into this. I think it will add a lot power to SOGo.

--
flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature Request: Automatic mail notice not only to the person who GETS new ACLs but also to the person who GIVES ACLs/SHAREs resources

[Francis Lachapelle]

Hi Pascal

On 2011-09-02, at 6:07 AM, Pascal Gienger wrote:

 Is it possibile in some way to turn of the anyone sharing option?
 (All authenticated users). It is too heavy for us, one wrong click and
 all mails are public to all of our users...

For the moment, the best approach is to modify 
WebServerResources/UIxAclEditor.js. Look for the function onAclLoadHandler and 
remove the first occurrence of ul.appendChild(userNode);.


Francis

--
flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca
Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

-- 
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature Request to omit UID@SOGoMailDomain as calendar-user-address-set?

[Pascal Gienger]

Would it be a big task to insert a configurable option to hide 
UIDFieldName@SOGoMailDomain in the calendar-user-address-set?



In my account case, the PROPFIND results in the following:


 a:calendar-user-address-set
  D:href xmlns:D=DAV:mailto:pascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de/D:href
  D:href xmlns:D=DAV:mailto:p3749...@uni-konstanz.de/D:href
 /a:calendar-user-address-set


p3749640 is our internal user id which gets never to the outside, our 
IMAP boxes have also this name. It is the uid field in LDAP and with 
this unique id the database tables get populated by SOGo. That's good.


SOGo seems to give away p3749...@uni-konstanz.de also as calendar user 
name, but this address will not be usable from the outside.
Apple iCal does use this address (I don't know why) as its internal user 
name after creating the account and it won't recognize that 
pascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de is the same as 
p3749...@uni-konstanz.de. This is very confusing and appalling.


The easiest reason would be to only issue the mail address as 
calendar-user-address-set, configurable by a Yes/No-Option.



Pascal
--
Pascal Gienger Jabber/XMPP/Mail: pascal.gien...@uni-konstanz.de
University of Konstanz, IT Services Department (Rechenzentrum)
Electronic Communications and Web Services
Building V, Room V404, Phone +49 7531 88 5048, Fax +49 7531 88 3739
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

[SOGo] Feature request - Adress book improovements

[Mac User FR]

Hello all,

First of all sorry if this is not the right place for feature  
requests, please redirect me in the good way.


I'm very interested in SOGO and tried yesterday the online demo. One  
thing I would need and that doesn't appear to exist (at least in the  
demo setup) is link between address book cards. Maybe it's clearer  
with an example:


1) Go to address book
2) Make a diffusion list
3) Put some people in there
4) Save the list
5) Go to the individual card of someone in the list
6) Change his mail address, save
7) The address won't change from the diffusion list.

The behaviour is that the address is copied at the moment of the list  
creation. You surely have reasons to do that way, but in production  
use I can imagine the mess of address books. People have many  
contacts, some of them change addresses quite often. To have many  
copies of the address and have to change all of them manually isn't  
the good way, in my opinion. It would be better to have one entry and  
that other ones be pointers/alias to this one.


This behaviour would be suitable to different address books too, in my  
opinion. It would be better to have groups than address books.  
People should still have the choice to duplicate cards, but in the  
goal to make some changes. To have man times the same card in  
different address books doesn't make any sens for me.


What surprises me is that most of programs I've tried have this  
duplication behaviour. For me, it's like developers never used their  
programs to do many lists of contacts. If you are interested in a good  
example, look at the Mac OS X address book. This, is for me a good  
implementation.


Well, sorry to be critic against SOGO in my first mail. The whole  
project seams very interesting. I can't forget to thank the developers  
to make this open source and freeware. I know that such a development  
take a lot of time. Please don't take this message as a your dev  
suck but as a hey guys, your dev could be even better if


Best regards,

Vitorio


--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request - Adress book improovements

[Alessio Fattorini]

On 21/09/2010 11:21, Mac User FR wrote:


1) Go to address book
2) Make a diffusion list
3) Put some people in there
4) Save the list
5) Go to the individual card of someone in the list
6) Change his mail address, save
7) The address won't change from the diffusion list.


You're right, I have added a bug

http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=850


--
Alessio Fattorini (alessio.fattor...@nethesis.it)

nethesis srl - Via degli Olmi 16/4 - 61100 Pesaro (PU)
tel. +39 0721 405516 - fax +39 0721 268147
www.nethesis.it - i...@nethesis.it
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Feature request - Adress book improovements

[Mac User FR]

Thanks!

Hope this is solved soon.

Le 21 sept. 10 à 11:57, Alessio Fattorini a écrit :


On 21/09/2010 11:21, Mac User FR wrote:


1) Go to address book
2) Make a diffusion list
3) Put some people in there
4) Save the list
5) Go to the individual card of someone in the list
6) Change his mail address, save
7) The address won't change from the diffusion list.


You're right, I have added a bug

http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=850


--
Alessio Fattorini (alessio.fattor...@nethesis.it)

nethesis srl - Via degli Olmi 16/4 - 61100 Pesaro (PU)
tel. +39 0721 405516 - fax +39 0721 268147
www.nethesis.it - i...@nethesis.it
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists




--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists