Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
-- Martin Šimovič NETSON s.r.o. Mlynská 2238 934 01 Levice tel: +421 915 393 570 mail: mar...@netson.sk mailto:mar...@netson.sk On 20 Mar 2015, at 15:43, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: On 20 Mar 2015, at 14:53, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:45 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: Outlook 2013 does not support multiple address books when using EAS. Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. So... does this mean that Outlook+Office365 *does* support multiple shared 'Address Books’? Outlook + Office365 does not use EAS. Outlook + Office365 supports whatever Exchange supports (I guess that means multiple address books too) smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 22 Mar 2015, at 12:59, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the same protocol SOGo uses for Outlook 2010 (which requires Samba4)? Yes. RoH stands for RPC over HTTP and in SOGo implementation it requires Samba4, Openchange and Openchange-rpcproxy to work. I don’t know about anyone using openchange-rpcproxy from stable distribution successfully, so you can likely forget this approach for now. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/23/2015 4:29 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: On 22 Mar 2015, at 12:59, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the same protocol SOGo uses for Outlook 2010 (which requires Samba4)? Yes. RoH stands for RPC over HTTP and in SOGo implementation it requires Samba4, Openchange and Openchange-rpcproxy to work. I don’t know about anyone using openchange-rpcproxy from stable distribution successfully, so you can likely forget this approach for now. Ok, well, bummer, that kills that idea... Now I have no ammunition left to fight the switch. :( -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the same protocol SOGo uses for Outlook 2010 (which requires Samba4)? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/20/2015 3:00 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 14:58, Charles Marcus wrote: So this is *not* an Outlook limitation - maybe just an AS limitation? It's an Outlook limitation when using EAS - that is what I was talking about. Right, sorry, I guess I just assumed that Outlook 2013+Office365 would use EAS... -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/19/2015 2:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: Don't forget that Thunderbird + SOGo extensions gives you calendar / address books sharing with delegation. Outlook 2013 + EAS does not. Thanks Ludovic, But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? I guess I need to actually start testing now... ;) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? Only Calendars, and if you have the proper permissions to add/modify/delete calendar components for that particular calendar. Outlook 2013 does not support multiple address books when using EAS. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/20/2015 9:45 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? Only Calendars, and if you have the proper permissions to add/modify/delete calendar components for that particular calendar. Outlook 2013 does not support multiple address books when using EAS. Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 20 Mar 2015, at 14:53, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:45 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? Only Calendars, and if you have the proper permissions to add/modify/delete calendar components for that particular calendar. Outlook 2013 does not support multiple address books when using EAS. Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/20/2015 9:56 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. Perfect, one more argument *against* using Outlook (although I think that is a lost cause)... ;) Thanks! -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 20/03/2015 14:58, Charles Marcus wrote: So this is*not* an Outlook limitation - maybe just an AS limitation? It's an Outlook limitation when using EAS - that is what I was talking about. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
On 3/20/2015 9:56 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. Apparently this is incorrect, in Office 365, with Outlook, you can create multiple Contacts Folders under your 'My Contacts' (apparently same as 'Address Books' in Thunderbird), and share them separately... So this is *not* an Outlook limitation - maybe just an AS limitation? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
Anyone? On 3/9/2015 11:51 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: Hello, My questions has to do with potentially performance impacting issues if we switch from Thunderbird + Integrator to Outlook + AS... We have our mail server (dovecot) running on one virtual server, and SOGo running on a separate virtual server. Currently, with Thunderbird, there is no Email Syncing going on with respect to SOGo, because Thunderbird talks directly to the mail server. But, if we switch to Outlook + AS - am I correct that all email synchronization would then flow through the SOGo server? If so, this would probably require major tuning needs on my end, plus I'd need to learn how to create a fat pipe between the two VMs... Thanks for any pointers/tips anyone can provide on making this switch as painless as possible... Charles -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator
Hello, My questions has to do with potentially performance impacting issues if we switch from Thunderbird + Integrator to Outlook + AS... We have our mail server (dovecot) running on one virtual server, and SOGo running on a separate virtual server. Currently, with Thunderbird, there is no Email Syncing going on with respect to SOGo, because Thunderbird talks directly to the mail server. But, if we switch to Outlook + AS - am I correct that all email synchronization would then flow through the SOGo server? If so, this would probably require major tuning needs on my end, plus I'd need to learn how to create a fat pipe between the two VMs... Thanks for any pointers/tips anyone can provide on making this switch as painless as possible... Charles -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
