On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap (see
bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there are still
same problems with rebuild, as were in 2.0.0.
Hi Slávek,
Jean Raby is on vacation right
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 20:36:07 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
On 2012-10-11 13:12, Slávek Banko wrote:
Hi all,
When I again added patches for imaps and sieve with mailhost from ldap
(see bugs 1061 and 1866) and rebuild 2.0.1, I was surprised that there
are still same problems with
Thank you for your response.
For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and also
sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not been
carried out related fix - adding include gen_ndr/server_id.h into
libmapiproxy.h. Therefore, I have patch that adds
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:34:01 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
Thank you for your response.
For rebuild debian package I have apt sources for both sogo-stable, and
also sogo-nightly. I've looked also to Openchange SVN, but there has not
been carried out related fix - adding include
Ah ok, I understand now.
I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please
use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the
next release.
Wolfgang
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 21:50:34 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
Ah ok, I understand now.
I have applied a fix in OpenChange, where the issue really lies. Please
use the next nightly builds. Of course this will also be included in the
next release.
Wolfgang
Wonderful, thank you.
Anyway,
Wonderful, thank you.
Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning, from the
SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor negative, no
requirements to change patches, just nothing.
Those bloody SOGo spoon benders. Don't ever trust them!
Seriously though,
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 22:00:31 Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
Wonderful, thank you.
Anyway, I just regret that to the patches mentioned at the beginning,
from the SOGo team was no reaction at all - neither positive nor
negative, no requirements to change patches, just nothing.
Those
