Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
+1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie. Thanks! El Miércoles, 20 de mayo, 2015 20:02:21, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca escribió: On 20/05/2015 20:22, Zhang Huangbin wrote: Not yet a stable build? Because SOGo v2.3.0 is not released. Why? Because there's virtually *no* download of the i386 arch on recent distro we support. It's a waste of resources. If there's enough people asking for it, we might provide them but in the meantime, we won't. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
When there's less than 4 Gigabytes of RAM, the empirical evidence I have is that an x86 distributtion offers a better performance than an amd64 one. For deployments of light load or simple exploration environments, it could be convenient also, taking advantage of existing hardware available with 32 bits microprocessors. As far as I know the naming of the Debian port depends on the underlying microprocessor architecture. In https://www.debian.org/ports/ the adaption for 32 bits PC hardware is listed as i386, but when installed it could be reported as i386 or i686 by the running Linux kernel. To ease the issue, it could be referred as x86. El Jueves, 21 de mayo, 2015 9:00:43, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org escribió: On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote: +1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie. Why on earth would anyone intentionally run an i386 version of anything on a server today??? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
SOHO: using my hardware as long as it does what i want it to do like i want it to do. and small groups don't need big hardware. Thanx to all of you for your great work! J. Feldner __ Am 21.05.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Tanstaafl: On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote: +1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie. Why on earth would anyone intentionally run an i386 version of anything on a server today??? -- Johannes Feldner Goethestraße 67 D - 35390 Gießen +49 641 75687 m...@johannesfeldner.de -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
On 5/21/2015 7:37 AM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote: +1 for i386/i686 packages for Debian Jessie. Why on earth would anyone intentionally run an i386 version of anything on a server today??? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
Am 21.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Zhang Huangbin: On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with little to no effort)... Just curious, does SOGo team build packages with scripts or not? It should be a one-time job for one Linux distribution release (e.g. Debian 7, Debian 8). correct me if i was wrong. The building is automated (Thats why we have nightlies) In theorie it's a one time job. In reality - You have to make the scripts - The builds can break for whatever reason - There might be 32/64Bit issues which need tracking,debugging,fixing So for me it makes sense to drop the 32bit builds. If someone sponsors the 32bit builds, then inverse will probably happily provide them in the future... ;) André -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
On 21/05/2015 15:38, André Schild wrote: - You have to make the scripts Checked. - The builds can break for whatever reason s/can/always/ - There might be 32/64Bit issues which need tracking,debugging,fixing s/might be/are always/ Ludo -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
On May 21, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: I see no problem with vendors with limited resources refusing to support ancient/antiquated environments (unless it can be scripted and done with little to no effort)... Just curious, does SOGo team build packages with scripts or not? It should be a one-time job for one Linux distribution release (e.g. Debian 7, Debian 8). correct me if i was wrong. Zhang Huangbin, founder of iRedMail project: http://www.iredmail.org/ -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
On 5/21/2015 10:41 AM, Zhang Huangbin z...@iredmail.org wrote: On May 21, 2015, at 10:13 PM, Rodolfo José Castellanos J. rodolfo...@yahoo.com wrote: As far as I know the naming of the Debian port depends on the underlying microprocessor architecture. In https://www.debian.org/ports/ the adaption for 32 bits PC hardware is listed as i386, but when installed it could be reported as i386 or i686 by the running Linux kernel. To ease the issue, it could be referred as x86. This is what i mean, x86. Thanks Rodolfo. And for new server hardware, you prefer x86_64/amd64, no problem at all. but how about existing/old hardware? Trash them and buy new hardware? Most processors have been 64bit for - what, 8? 10 years now? It would have to be really old hardware to be 32bit. Like I said - if you want to stay with such dated hardware you will have to live with the limitations and downsides... -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
hi, i've created an inssue in bugzilla http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3218 hope the packages will be released soon fous 2015-04-27 19:58 GMT+02:00 Dominik Breu dominik.b...@hbs-buko.info: Hello, i ask this question far back in mid march no awnser till today. But i ran Sogo on my Debian Testing now jessie server and it works after i mangaed to get it working. Had to merge wheezy jessie and unstable repos together but when it runs it runs flawlessly. greetings dominik Am Montag, den 27.04.2015, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Janis Hamme: Hi, now that Debian Jessie is considered stable, are there any plans on releasing Jessie packages with the next release? Is anyone running the SOGo packages included in Debian (1.3.16 in Wheezy, 2.2.9 in Jessie)? My major concern is if there are safe upgrade paths for such version jumps. If yes, I might consider to downgrade from 2.2.17 to 2.2.9 and keep it running until the next Debian release. Would that be safe? Janis -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
On 20/05/2015 07:12, Jan Krcmar wrote: i've created an inssue in bugzilla http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3218 hope the packages will be released soon Jessie builds are now available for x86_64: http://inverse.ca/debian-nightly/pool/jessie/ We do NOT plan to release i386 builds for Jessie. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] SOGo on Debian Jessie?
Hi, now that Debian Jessie is considered stable, are there any plans on releasing Jessie packages with the next release? Is anyone running the SOGo packages included in Debian (1.3.16 in Wheezy, 2.2.9 in Jessie)? My major concern is if there are safe upgrade paths for such version jumps. If yes, I might consider to downgrade from 2.2.17 to 2.2.9 and keep it running until the next Debian release. Would that be safe? Janis -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
