Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 29/03/2012 11:14, Khapare Joshi ha scritto: hello all, I dealt with sogo slow performance earlier - perhaps you can find in the list. I deployed sogo at my work around feb last year and is doing well. Although we have 17000+ users in our cyrus (imap server), only 6000 of those users are now using sogo. This might change very soon when we will enforce everyone to use sogo (goodbye to old sq mail). With the performance issue with the sogo. I also use imapproxy in between imap server and sogo server. This has certainly help to increase performance at least for me. Also, seach in mailing list as Sogo Slow performance - this will give you some idea how to optimize your sogo that we discussed. So what I did is: increase the number of PREFORK to 70(in /etc/sysconfig/sogo) and you need minimum 3 postgres connection per sogod which means: if you increase prefork to 70 then your postgres connection should be 3*70 This has helped at least for me. There are probably other technique to optimize sogod but at this time this is good for me:) try doing this and see what happens. Khapare Well, I applied all your suggestion, but no luck. - I installed imaproxy, listening on port 144, and instructed SoGo to connect to this port. I see it is correctly working - I preforked sogo to 10 (now there are only some test users) - I adapted postgres connections likewise The problem is the same: the system in the complex is ok, but 3 users with a LOT of folders, needs to wait 9 seconds to pass from Calendar or Address tab to Mail No such problem in Squirrel, or in thunderbird client. I don't know what to do... Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Hi Marco On 2012-04-13, at 8:45 AM, Marco Coli wrote: The problem is the same: the system in the complex is ok, but 3 users with a LOT of folders, needs to wait 9 seconds to pass from Calendar or Address tab to Mail No such problem in Squirrel, or in thunderbird client. It's likely a browser issue. Which browser (and version) is used? How many folders is a LOT of folders? Francis -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
HI, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Marco Coli marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com wrote: The problem is the same: the system in the complex is ok, but 3 users with a LOT of folders, needs to wait 9 seconds to pass from Calendar or Address tab to Mail No such problem in Squirrel, or in thunderbird client. I don't know what to do... You have probably tried with different browsers? Just noticed today that a user with Firefox + Firebug running caused SOGo web UI to render really slow. Disabling Firebug solved the problem. Best, Peter -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
On 2012-04-13, at 9:13 AM, Marco Coli wrote: It's likely a browser issue. Which browser (and version) is used? Thank you for your answer! Firefox, latest version (Now I am not on front of pc to tell you exactly). I will tell the user to try another browser. Which do you reccomend? Chrome, Explorer? Chrome should be the fastest. How many folders is a LOT of folders? Well, they have 50/100 folders owned, + a lot of shared folders from other users... I will give you a more precise number soon... Squirrel does not expand the folder tree, so there is no wait, but sogo on the web expand the whole structure by default, and here is the wait. Wrong: the folders state is saved and restored when the user visits the webmail. When logging in for the first time, no folder is expanded. Francis -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 15:20, Francis Lachapelle ha scritto: Well, they have 50/100 folders owned, + a lot of shared folders from other users... I will give you a more precise number soon... Squirrel does not expand the folder tree, so there is no wait, but sogo on the web expand the whole structure by default, and here is the wait. Wrong: the folders state is saved and restored when the user visits the webmail. When logging in for the first time, no folder is expanded. Mumble I am trying now... I am logged in (I have only 20 folders total), my structure is fully opened, I close it, I move to Calendar, I return to Mail, all folders are expanded. It is not supposed to be? Do I have something wrong? Platform RHEL6.2, sogo 1.3.14, cyrus-imapd 2.4.14 Thank you Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
On 2012-04-13, at 9:30 AM, Marco Coli wrote: Il 13/04/2012 15:20, Francis Lachapelle ha scritto: Well, they have 50/100 folders owned, + a lot of shared folders from other users... I will give you a more precise number soon... Squirrel does not expand the folder tree, so there is no wait, but sogo on the web expand the whole structure by default, and here is the wait. Wrong: the folders state is saved and restored when the user visits the webmail. When logging in for the first time, no folder is expanded. Mumble I am trying now... I am logged in (I have only 20 folders total), my structure is fully opened, I close it, I move to Calendar, I return to Mail, all folders are expanded. It is not supposed to be? Do I have something wrong? Platform RHEL6.2, sogo 1.3.14, cyrus-imapd 2.4.14 You are probably experiencing this bug : http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1767 Do you see parsing errors in your log file? Francis -- flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 15:34, Francis Lachapelle ha scritto: Mumble I am trying now... I am logged in (I have only 20 folders total), my structure is fully opened, I close it, I move to Calendar, I return to Mail, all folders are expanded. It is not supposed to be? Do I have something wrong? Platform RHEL6.2, sogo 1.3.14, cyrus-imapd 2.4.14 You are probably experiencing this bug : http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1767 Do you see parsing errors in your log file? Francis -- flachape...@inverse.camailto:flachape...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3640 :: http://www.inverse.ca Inverse :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org) No, I do not have parsing error. At the bottom I paste some log, it seems to be fine Well, now I understand why the performance are bad with hundred of nesting folders... They are not supposed to explode every time!!! I assumed that the normal webmail behaviour was that... In the bug there is a proposed solution, but I don't think this is my case, what do you think? Thank you localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:10 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/logoff HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.015 - - 0 2012-04-13 15:25:10.658 sogod[21695] WARNING(-[NSNull(misc) count]): called NSNull -count (returns 0) !!! localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:10 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/ HTTP/1.1 200 4090/0 0.017 11379 64% 0 Apr 13 15:25:18 sogod [21695]: SOGoRootPage successful login for user 'marco_hc' - expire = -1 grace = -1 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:18 GMT] POST /SOGo/connect HTTP/1.1 200 27/46 0.014 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:19 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.002 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:19 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/view HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.003 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:19 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.002 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:20 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail/view HTTP/1.1 200 9760/0 0.495 34592 71% 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:20 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Calendar/alarmslist?browserTime=1334323520 HTTP/1.1 200 2/0 0.006 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:20 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail/0/mailboxes HTTP/1.1 200 1584/0 0.297 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:21 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail/foldersState HTTP/1.1 200 198/0 0.004 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:25:21 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail//0/folderINBOX/unseenCount HTTP/1.1 200 13/0 0.286 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:05 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail//0/folderINBOX/expunge HTTP/1.1 200 2/0 0.286 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:05 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.002 - - 0 Apr 13 15:27:06 sogod [21695]: 0x041A3628[SOGoContactGCSFolder]:personalD fetched 1 records. localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:06 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts/view HTTP/1.1 200 7100/0 0.151 21535 67% 60K localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:07 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Calendar/alarmslist?browserTime=1334323627 HTTP/1.1 200 2/0 0.006 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:07 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts/personal/canAccessContent HTTP/1.1 204 0/0 0.008 - - 0 localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:07 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts/niccolai_8A8-4F58CB00-3-326772C0/canAccessContent HTTP/1.1 204 0/0 0.011 - - 8K localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:07 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts/public/canAccessContent HTTP/1.1 204 0/0 0.008 - - 4K 2012-04-13 15:27:07.539 sogod[27646] Note: Using UTF-8 as URL encoding in NGExtensions. Apr 13 15:27:07 sogod [27646]: 0x0x2415418[SOGoCache] Cache cleanup interval set every 300.00 seconds Apr 13 15:27:07 sogod [27646]: 0x0x2415418[SOGoCache] Using host(s) '127.0.0.1' as server(s) Apr 13 15:27:07 sogod [27646]: 0x0x242e408[LDAPSource] WARNING: using old bindFields format - please update it 2012-04-13 15:27:07.550 sogod[27646] Note(SoObject): SoDebugKeyLookup is enabled! 2012-04-13 15:27:07.550 sogod[27646] Note(SoObject): SoDebugBaseURL is enabled! 2012-04-13 15:27:07.550 sogod[27646] Note(SoObject): relative base URLs are enabled. localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:07 GMT] POST /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Contacts/8A8-4F58C200-1-326772C0/canAccessContent HTTP/1.1 204 0/0 0.080 - - 1M localhost.localdomain - - [13/Apr/2012:15:27:08 GMT] GET /SOGo/so/marco_hc/Mail HTTP/1.1 302 0/0 0.003 - - 28K 2012-04-13 15:27:09.092 sogod[27646] WOCompoundElement: pool embedding is on. 2012-04-13 15:27:09.092 sogod[27646] WOCompoundElement: id logging is on. 2012-04-13 15:27:09.186 sogod[27646] WARNING: IMAP4 connection pooling is disabled! 2012-04-13 15:27:09.228 sogod[27646] Note(NGImap4Connection): using '.' as the IMAP4 folder separator. 2012-04-13 15:27:09.519 sogod[27646] Note: using 'UCS-2LE' on Linux.
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 15:20, Francis Lachapelle ha scritto: Wrong: the folders state is saved and restored when the user visits the webmail. When logging in for the first time, no folder is expanded. Well, I tried with zeg under vmware, and the behaviour is the same... I created a lot of nested folders, and they are ALWAYS opened, no matter if I close them before changing tab in the webmail... Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Well, I tried with zeg under vmware, and the behaviour is the same... I created a lot of nested folders, and they are ALWAYS opened, no matter if I close them before changing tab in the webmail... Marco Coli Which ZEG? SOGo 2.0 rc1 ? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 16:07, Wolfgang Sourdeau ha scritto: Well, I tried with zeg under vmware, and the behaviour is the same... I created a lot of nested folders, and they are ALWAYS opened, no matter if I close them before changing tab in the webmail... Marco Coli Which ZEG? SOGo 2.0 rc1 ? no, the stable one, 1.3.12 Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 15:20, Francis Lachapelle ha scritto: Thank you for your answer! Firefox, latest version (Now I am not on front of pc to tell you exactly). I will tell the user to try another browser. Which do you reccomend? Chrome, Explorer? Chrome should be the fastest. I ask the user to try, he has no chrome and he can't install it right now,, with firefox 11 he waits 9 seconds, with Explorer 9.0.8 he waits 21 (!) seconds Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Le 12-04-13 10:09, Marco Coli a écrit : no, the stable one, 1.3.12 There is a bug in SOGo 1.3.13 where certain characters are not properly escaped. You need to update to 1.3.14 and perform the fix that Francis mentionned previously. Wolfgang -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 16:12, Wolfgang Sourdeau ha scritto: Le 12-04-13 10:09, Marco Coli a écrit : no, the stable one, 1.3.12 There is a bug in SOGo 1.3.13 where certain characters are not properly escaped. You need to update to 1.3.14 and perform the fix that Francis mentionned previously. Wolfgang Thank you. I can try the fix, but I do not think this is my case. Apart from the test I did with ZEG, the production site started with 1.3.13, now i 1.3.14, and if I do a backup like in http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=1767 , I have no errors: [sogo@nic-server-mail ~]$ sogo-tool -v backup /BACKUP/CANC/test ALL Apr 13 16:18:14 sogo-tool [2865]: 0x0xb8ce08[LDAPSource] WARNING: using old bindFields format - please update it Apr 13 16:18:14 sogo-tool [2865]: 0x0xc2da08[SOGoCache] Cache cleanup interval set every 300.00 seconds Apr 13 16:18:14 sogo-tool [2865]: 0x0xc2da08[SOGoCache] Using host(s) '127.0.0.1' as server(s) Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 13/04/2012 16:12, Wolfgang Sourdeau ha scritto: There is a bug in SOGo 1.3.13 where certain characters are not properly escaped. You need to update to 1.3.14 and perform the fix that Francis mentionned previously. Wolfgang I have some problem trying to apply Francis' fix: [sogo@nic-server-mail ~]$ psql sogo Password: * psql (8.4.9) Digita help per aiuto. sogo= begin transaction; BEGIN sogo= update sogo_user_profile set c_settings = replace(c_settings, '\\', '\'); sogo' update sogo_user_profile set c_defaults = replace(c_defaults, '\\', '\'); Comando errato \. Prova \? per la guida. sogo( I think there is some escape character problem in the string -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
hello all, I dealt with sogo slow performance earlier - perhaps you can find in the list. I deployed sogo at my work around feb last year and is doing well. Although we have 17000+ users in our cyrus (imap server), only 6000 of those users are now using sogo. This might change very soon when we will enforce everyone to use sogo (goodbye to old sq mail). With the performance issue with the sogo. I also use imapproxy in between imap server and sogo server. This has certainly help to increase performance at least for me. Also, seach in mailing list as Sogo Slow performance - this will give you some idea how to optimize your sogo that we discussed. So what I did is: increase the number of PREFORK to 70(in /etc/sysconfig/sogo) and you need minimum 3 postgres connection per sogod which means: if you increase prefork to 70 then your postgres connection should be 3*70 This has helped at least for me. There are probably other technique to optimize sogod but at this time this is good for me:) try doing this and see what happens. Khapare On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:29 AM, James James jre...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Apache2 and memcached with sogo 1.3.14 James Le 28 mars 2012 11:19, Martin Seener mar...@seener.de a écrit : are u using apache2 with memcached? we have one sogo 1.3.12c with iRedMail running on the smallest JiffyBox and its quite fast. Am 3/28/12 11:12 AM, schrieb James James: Hi, I have the same problem too. It's take about five seconds to commit a change from and reload the web interface. On the demo page ( http://sogo-demo.inverse.ca/SOGo/so/sogo1/Calendar/view login:sogo1 passwd: sogo1) , it's a faster. I am using RHEL6, 48Gb RAM and a local postgresql server. Can you give us some clues to tune (and improve) the performances ? Regards Le 28 mars 2012 08:45, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it a écrit : Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
In my case, it was a account issue. My account was the only one that was slow. I had duplicate events on all my calendars and my query size (cf sogo.log) was about 500k. I juste remove my accout data with : sogo-tool remove user and now everything woks well. Thanks for your attention guys. Le 29 mars 2012 11:14, Khapare Joshi khapar...@gmail.com a écrit : hello all, I dealt with sogo slow performance earlier - perhaps you can find in the list. I deployed sogo at my work around feb last year and is doing well. Although we have 17000+ users in our cyrus (imap server), only 6000 of those users are now using sogo. This might change very soon when we will enforce everyone to use sogo (goodbye to old sq mail). With the performance issue with the sogo. I also use imapproxy in between imap server and sogo server. This has certainly help to increase performance at least for me. Also, seach in mailing list as Sogo Slow performance - this will give you some idea how to optimize your sogo that we discussed. So what I did is: increase the number of PREFORK to 70(in /etc/sysconfig/sogo) and you need minimum 3 postgres connection per sogod which means: if you increase prefork to 70 then your postgres connection should be 3*70 This has helped at least for me. There are probably other technique to optimize sogod but at this time this is good for me:) try doing this and see what happens. Khapare On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:29 AM, James James jre...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Apache2 and memcached with sogo 1.3.14 James Le 28 mars 2012 11:19, Martin Seener mar...@seener.de a écrit : are u using apache2 with memcached? we have one sogo 1.3.12c with iRedMail running on the smallest JiffyBox and its quite fast. Am 3/28/12 11:12 AM, schrieb James James: Hi, I have the same problem too. It's take about five seconds to commit a change from and reload the web interface. On the demo page ( http://sogo-demo.inverse.ca/SOGo/so/sogo1/Calendar/view login:sogo1 passwd: sogo1) , it's a faster. I am using RHEL6, 48Gb RAM and a local postgresql server. Can you give us some clues to tune (and improve) the performances ? Regards Le 28 mars 2012 08:45, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it a écrit : Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 29/03/2012 11:14, Khapare Joshi ha scritto: hello all, [] This has helped at least for me. There are probably other technique to optimize sogod but at this time this is good for me:) try doing this and see what happens. Khapare Well, thank you very much for your valuable infos! I will try to apply your suggestions to my case. I will let you know! Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Hi, I have the same problem too. It's take about five seconds to commit a change from and reload the web interface. On the demo page ( http://sogo-demo.inverse.ca/SOGo/so/sogo1/Calendar/view login:sogo1 passwd: sogo1) , it's a faster. I am using RHEL6, 48Gb RAM and a local postgresql server. Can you give us some clues to tune (and improve) the performances ? Regards Le 28 mars 2012 08:45, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it a écrit : Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_**64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/**alessicehttp://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
are u using apache2 with memcached? we have one sogo 1.3.12c with iRedMail running on the smallest JiffyBox and its quite fast. Am 3/28/12 11:12 AM, schrieb James James: Hi, I have the same problem too. It's take about five seconds to commit a change from and reload the web interface. On the demo page (http://sogo-demo.inverse.ca/SOGo/so/sogo1/Calendar/view login:sogo1 passwd: sogo1) , it's a faster. I am using RHEL6, 48Gb RAM and a local postgresql server. Can you give us some clues to tune (and improve) the performances ? Regards Le 28 mars 2012 08:45, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it mailto:ales...@skye.it a écrit : Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ http://www.linux.it/%7Ealessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu mailto:users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
I am using Apache2 and memcached with sogo 1.3.14 James Le 28 mars 2012 11:19, Martin Seener mar...@seener.de a écrit : are u using apache2 with memcached? we have one sogo 1.3.12c with iRedMail running on the smallest JiffyBox and its quite fast. Am 3/28/12 11:12 AM, schrieb James James: Hi, I have the same problem too. It's take about five seconds to commit a change from and reload the web interface. On the demo page ( http://sogo-demo.inverse.ca/SOGo/so/sogo1/Calendar/view login:sogo1 passwd: sogo1) , it's a faster. I am using RHEL6, 48Gb RAM and a local postgresql server. Can you give us some clues to tune (and improve) the performances ? Regards Le 28 mars 2012 08:45, Alessio Cecchi ales...@skye.it a écrit : Il 27/03/2012 19:52, Marco Coli ha scritto: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I thought it was a new installation, in your case you can not switch to dovecot, at least not simply. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Do you have in your SOGo config: SOGoMemcachedHost 127.0.0.1 Should be by default. -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 26/03/2012 17:18, Marco Coli ha scritto: Hello. We've been using cyrus imap since 10 years. Our actual machine is RHEL 6.2, DL380G6 with 8GB RAM Recently, I installed (from yum rpm channel) and configured SOgo. All went well, we are at the beginning, now we are testing the web access. All is ok for users with a moderate quantity of mail folders, while for users with a lot of folders+a lot of Other Users folders+a lot of Shared Folders, there is a performance issue. For example, at login, or changing from Calendar or Address Book to Mail, the user must wait around 10 seconds before seeing the mail tree. Maybe is because by default the mail tree appears completely opened? Do you think there is a workaround to this problem? (in thunderbird, only witch cyrus at the moment, there is absolutely no delay in folder navigation or in launching application) Thank you Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. Have you properly configured memcached? -- Alessio Cecchi is: @ ILS - http://www.linux.it/~alessice/ on LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/alessice Assistenza Sistemi GNU/Linux - http://www.cecchi.biz/ @ PLUG - ex-Presidente, adesso senatore a vita, http://www.prato.linux.it @ LOLUG - Socio http://www.lolug.net -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. Have you properly configured memcached? Well, it depends on what you intend with properly. At first memcached was not active (as I noticed on sogo logs). After this I started it, with these parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= But nothing has changed about this performance issue. Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Am 27.03.2012 19:52, schrieb Marco Coli: Il 27/03/2012 08:57, Alessio Cecchi ha scritto: Hi Marco, what IMAP server are you using? Dovecot should have better performance than Cyrus. I am using cyrus-imapd-2.4.14-1.el6.x86_64. Are you sure about best Dovecot performances? For us is not possible to migrate, we are using Cyrus for the last 10 years. In the daily use, with Thunderbird as a client or with squirrelmail as web application, we never experienced any performance issue. I don't think that cyrus is per default slower than dovecot (But that's another story) Where do you see performance issues ? We first need to find the bottleneck before we can find solutions André -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
Re: [SOGo] Web Performance issue
Il 27/03/2012 20:12, André Schild ha scritto: Where do you see performance issues ? We first need to find the bottleneck before we can find solutions Thank you for your answer. The performance issue are on the webmail, on users with a lot of folders, shared folders, Other users folders, there is a big time (10 seconds ca.) when changing tabs from Calendar or Address Book to Mail tab. There is no such delay using squirrelmail or regular email client. Memcached is on, with default parameters: PORT=11211 USER=nobody MAXCONN=1024 CACHESIZE=64 OPTIONS= Thank you Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
[SOGo] Web Performance issue
Hello. We've been using cyrus imap since 10 years. Our actual machine is RHEL 6.2, DL380G6 with 8GB RAM Recently, I installed (from yum rpm channel) and configured SOgo. All went well, we are at the beginning, now we are testing the web access. All is ok for users with a moderate quantity of mail folders, while for users with a lot of folders+a lot of Other Users folders+a lot of Shared Folders, there is a performance issue. For example, at login, or changing from Calendar or Address Book to Mail, the user must wait around 10 seconds before seeing the mail tree. Maybe is because by default the mail tree appears completely opened? Do you think there is a workaround to this problem? (in thunderbird, only witch cyrus at the moment, there is absolutely no delay in folder navigation or in launching application) Thank you -- Saluti - Marco Coli Marco Coli Global Services CAD CAM Specialist Tel.+39 057444741 Fax+39 0574440645 E-mail marco.c...@tecnosistemi.com Web www.tecnosistemi.com -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
