Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-28 Thread Ralf Cirksena
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:33:05PM +0100 you wrote: > We've been running v3 since its initial release and I > have never experienced any different behaviour. The appointments > are correctly flagged as confidential (if you examine the XML sent > to the client) but I believe this should be

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-27 Thread "sg gs"
uot; <users@sogo.nu> To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments hello,   caldav: at least v3.1.3.20160623-1 honors the confidential/private flag but i'm unsure if this is done on the server side - tested this using icedove/ligthning.   carddav: does not apply   sorry fo

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-26 Thread "sg gs"
;\\\"sg gs\\\"\" (s...@mail.com)" <users@sogo.nu> To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments hello,   i guess caldav/carddav/.. suffer from the same issue and i was told this is a weakness, deigned into the rfc. the implementaion is correct wit

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-24 Thread "sg gs"
?   thanks for your attention   regards, g.     Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 2:55 PM From: "\"Ralf Cirksena\" (c...@holmco.de)" <users@sogo.nu> To: "Ian McMichael" <users@sogo.nu> Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments On Thu,

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-23 Thread Ralf Cirksena
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:33:05PM +0100 you wrote: > It is here. We've been running v3 since its initial release and I > have never experienced any different behaviour. Bad. > The appointments are correctly flagged as confidential (if you > examine the XML sent to the client) but I believe

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-23 Thread Ian McMichael
On 23/06/16 07:53, Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de) wrote: Is that still an issue in SOGo 3.1.2? It is here. We've been running v3 since its initial release and I have never experienced any different behaviour. The appointments are correctly flagged as confidential (if you examine the XML

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-23 Thread "sg gs"
yes, it's a schow stopper - agreed   Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 8:40 AM From: "\"Ralf Cirksena\" (c...@holmco.de)" <users@sogo.nu> To: "Ian McMichael" <users@sogo.nu> Subject: Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-23 Thread Ralf Cirksena
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100 you wrote: > Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync > there is a long-standing bug which reveals confidential information > regardless of the settings: > > https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3118 Uh oh... We are syncing MS

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-23 Thread Ralf Cirksena
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:56:40PM +0100 you wrote: > Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync > there is a long-standing bug which reveals confidential information > regardless of the settings: > > https://sogo.nu/bugs/view.php?id=3118 Is that still an issue in SOGo

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-22 Thread Ian McMichael
On 22/06/16 12:51, Christian Mack (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) wrote: You did give them privileges to see those in your calendar. Or the admin did so, and you didn't change that. Alternatively, if any of your users are connected via ActiveSync there is a long-standing bug which reveals

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-22 Thread Ralf Cirksena
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:51:41PM +0200 you wrote: > You did give them privileges to see those in your calendar. > Or the admin did so, and you didn't change that. The others, who should not see the details of confidential entries, have permission to see time/date. Maybe I found out what has

Re: [SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-22 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Am 22.06.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Ralf Cirksena (c...@holmco.de): > > if I enter an appointment as "confidential" through the web interface > it is visable to others in CalDAV synchronized Thunderbird calendar. > > SOGo 3.1.2 > > What's wrong here? > You did give them privileges to see

[SOGo] confidential appointments

2016-06-22 Thread Ralf Cirksena
Hello, if I enter an appointment as "confidential" through the web interface it is visable to others in CalDAV synchronized Thunderbird calendar. SOGo 3.1.2 What's wrong here? Greetings -- R. Cirksena -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists