d https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15478 for it. I attached
> your steps as a comment.
>
> Yes, we tried to use RELOAD the collection, but it did not help to make the
> schema changes visible.
> I'll try RESTORE with collection.configName
>
> Kind Regards
> St
Hey Steffen,
I took a quick look at the backup/restore codepath involved here -
surprisingly the restore code itself hasn't changed between 8.6.3 and
8.8.2. In both 8.6.3 and 8.8.2, if the configset mentioned in the
backup has the same name as a config currently in ZooKeeper, the
version in ZK
orkaround this by
specifying a "collection.configName" param on your RESTORE call - this
will cause the backed up configset to be uploaded to ZK under a
different name - hopefully avoiding whatever caching is causing the
trouble here.
Best,
Jason
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:38 AM Jason Ge
Hi Luca,
Your permissions look correct, generally speaking. What version of Solr
are you running?
There are some known problems using the RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin in
standalone mode - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13097 for
more details. Normally I would suspect that
Hey Thomas,
Thanks for reporting the discrepancy so thoroughly! The API "/extract" API
used by "post.jar" still exists but was removed from default configurations
starting back around 8.4. The tutorial in Solr's Ref Guide should have
been updated around the same time, but it looks like a few
Hi Adam,
Solr's backup functionality integrated into the /replication handler
is relatively simple - it just iterates over index files and copies
them to the requested location. The only time that replication
handler backup delete files is when the backup fails and Solr tries to
clean up after
Hi Phil,
Solr has a number of tests that are flaky and fail seemingly at
random. Some of this is true flakiness: bugs that only occur with
certain timing behavior. Some of it is driven by the Solr Test
Framework's heavy use of randomization in running test cases. ("ant
test" assigns seeds for
Hey Jigar,
I don't think the sort of thing you're asking about is possible today.
Solr allows users to define default param-values on the
"request-handler" backed APIs that are defined in each solrconfig.xml
of each configset, but it has no equivalent of this (afaik) that would
work for the
Hi Tran,
I think you're specifying 'solr.allowPaths' in the right place, but
you probably need to remove the wildcard ('*') from the path you're
using. Most 'solr.allowPaths' usages I've seen (including the doc
example you mentioned) specify paths as absolute paths without a
trailing wildcard.
Hey Artem,
Incremental backups were written primarily with SolrCloud in mind.
Many of the APIs (backup listing, backup deletion, etc.) work only in
SolrCloud, and most of our automated tests around backups focus on
SolrCloud setups.
That said, incremental backup in SolrCloud relies on doing
To your second question: no.
Solr's backup process works by sending a message to each shard leader
to fetch and restore the data in that shard. Shard leaders fetch this
data from the backup repository (S3 in this case), and then send
copies of this data to any other replicas that might exist in
The "Provider \"c\" not installed" message seems to indicate that Solr
is reading the "c:/" at the start of your "location" parameter as a
URI protocol in the vein of "http://;, "file://", "hdfs://", etc.
Outside of that though I'm not sure how you could tweak the "location"
to prevent that, and
+1 - this looks like a gap in SolrJ's coverage of JSON Facets. Please
create a JIRA ticket and mention the ticket here.
I'm familiar with that piece of SolrJ and would be happy to
review/merge if anyone has a chance to write a patch.
Best,
Jason
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:44 AM Joel Bernstein
Hi Craig,
To be honest, I'm having a little trouble following all of the
messages in this thread.
This is at least my mail client's fault, as copy/paste has left the
thread looking very jumbled in GMail. But I think it's also harder
for us all to understand and help because we've been using a
Hey, thanks for sharing.
Each version of the operator supports a range of Solr versions. The latest
operator version (0.8.0) only supports Solr versions >= 8.11. It looks
like the tutorial you were following along with hasn't been updated to
match the range of Solr versions, which is definitely
admin/management use-cases, but for the first pass that's where things are.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 1:03 PM Jason Gerlowski
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On the development side of Solr I've been experimenting with creating API
> clients in different programming languages.
Hi all,
On the development side of Solr I've been experimenting with creating API
clients in different programming languages. These might not end up being
as feature-rich as SolrJ (e.g. topology-aware routing, etc.), but the hope
is that they'd give users a solid entry-point for interacting with
Hi Chris,
I'm not all that familiar with the "json.wrf" functionality, so I
could be off here. But starting in 9.3, Solr switched to using
Jackson for serialization and away from the homegrown code it's used
up to this point. I wonder whether that switch might've broken
"json.wrf" in 9.3? I
The Apache Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Solr Operator v0.8.0.
The Apache Solr Operator is a safe and easy way of managing a Solr
ecosystem in Kubernetes.
This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and
improvements, some of which are highlighted below.
ove the support then? With version 9.1? Or rather
> 10.x?
>
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:39 PM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > Haha, a "happy accident" for sure! I never relish trimming
> > functionality; it's necessary to keep the project even remotely
&g
don't know what is :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 8:41 AM Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > As you mentioned, the community originally planned to remove support
> > for creating new "snapshot-based" backups in 9.0. But, luckily for
Hi Michael,
As you mentioned, the community originally planned to remove support
for creating new "snapshot-based" backups in 9.0. But, luckily for
your case: it fell off my radar and was never actually removed. So
you should still be able to create snapshot backups using the
incremental=false
tributing to this open
> source search engine. You'll be mentored by Eric Pugh and Jason
> Gerlowski, both active Solr committers - take a look!
> https://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2022/10/03/solr-contributor-bootcamp/
>
> Eric is at ApacheCon USA in New Orleans this week if you'd
hat I missed
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, 3:26 PM Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>
> > Hi Anakhe,
> >
> > Yes; still planned for today! We actually just finished our first
> > time slot a few minutes ago. We'll be doing another session covering
> > the same material toda
t; > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Option 1: 9:00am EST (2pm GMT) using the following Zoom link:
> > > > > > > > > https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86936847178
> > > > > > > > > Option 2: 4:00pm EST (9pm
The Apache Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Solr Operator v0.6.0.
The Apache Solr Operator is a safe and easy way of managing a Solr
ecosystem in Kubernetes.
This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and
improvements, some of which are highlighted below.
Small update: for a variety of scheduling reasons and to have
sufficient prep time, we're pushing the third workshop back two weeks
to December 1st. Hope to see you there!
Best,
Jason
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 11:53 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
>
> Need help setting up your IDE to write some code? Not
nd discuss/troubleshoot their newdev contributions. We haven't
quite nailed down the timing yet, but look for an announcement about
that in the coming few days.
Thanks again to all who participated!
Best,
Jason
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 1:47 PM Eric Pugh
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Jason Gerlo
Additionally, can you include the specific API requests you've tried?
That, combined with the information Houston suggested above would help
others to reproduce and debug.
Best,
Jason
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:41 PM Houston Putman wrote:
>
> Are there any differences between your jetty and
Sounds like something that would be very useful for folks.
I'm sure it'd be very dependent on your data and the type of backup,
but I'm curious - if you can share Pierre - is there a number of
cores-per-node being backed up where you start to see problems?
Jason
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 8:34 AM
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.5.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic
clustering, database
t/deployment-guide/collection-management.html#backup
> 2.
>
> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/replica-management.html#addreplica
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 17:39, Jason Gerlowski
> wrote:
>
> > Good catch! This is definitely a bug that I
Good catch! This is definitely a bug that I introduced as a part of
SOLR-16393 - sorry for the trouble.
The problem, counter-intuitively, is this line. [1]. The annotations in
this file are overriding the ones we need in 'DeleteAliasApi' (which is
where the path and verb are specified).
I'll
Severity: moderate
Affected versions:
- Apache Solr Operator 0.3.0 through 0.8.0
Description:
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in the Apache
Solr Operator.
This issue affects all versions of the Apache Solr Operator from 0.3.0 through
0.8.0.
When asked to
The Apache Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Solr Operator v0.8.1.
The Apache Solr Operator is a safe and easy way of managing a Solr
ecosystem in Kubernetes.
This release contains several bug fixes, some of which are highlighted
below. It also resolves CVE-2024-31391, a
35 matches
Mail list logo
