This is a list that MailPolice hosts and I have been running it for a few
hours and it has already flagged some phish and fraud e-mails. Here is some
info about the list: http://rhs.mailpolice.com/#rhsfraud
This is my configuration for SA 2.64 with the SpamCopURI plug-in:
uri MP_URI_RBL
On Friday, September 17, 2004, 4:24:37 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
This is a list that MailPolice hosts and I have been running it for a few
hours and it has already flagged some phish and fraud e-mails. Here is some
info about the list: http://rhs.mailpolice.com/#rhsfraud
This is my
Hello Chr.,
Friday, September 17, 2004, 7:58:11 AM, Stucki (Christoph von Stuckrad)
wrote:
CvS On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:42:20AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
Since your box has 256mb of physical ram, I'd limit it to maximum of
256mb/15mb = 17 spamd's at the highest. I'd really suggest using
Hello Andy,
Friday, September 17, 2004, 3:23:15 AM, you wrote:
AS Hi, I just got a nigerian spam with a huge Reply-To: line! Never seen
AS that trick before, but I suppose it works with quite a few of the
AS recipients. Should we create a new rule for that? I can't think of
AS a legitimate
hello everyone,
With IP addresses, do the blocks of numbers have any specific meaning
or location-specific detail?
For eg, lots of spam I'm getting sent to one of my domain's addresses
with netsky attachments always shows 203.221 as the first two IP blocks
when I look at the received
Thanks,
I've now sent their abuse department the details, although I understand
that spammers can appear to be on a certain ISP even if they're not.
lee
jdow wrote:
A simple "whois" query indicates this is a set of addresses "owned"
by Comindico in Oz. If you don't have "whois" handy
At 06:21 PM 9/18/2004 +0300, Marie Fischer wrote:
Hello,
in the last week or two, we have been getting some
spam that spamassassin doesn't seem to recognize.
A common feature of all these messages seems to be
that they contain lots of special characters
(~, ^, `, and others) mixed into the text.
I
Would a rule to calculate some kind of special chars vs
total chars ratio be useful?
Does anybody have that kind of rule already?
Doing that as a ratio would require an eval, I suspect. However, detecting
obfuscated things is pretty easy. You need some new rules! :-) Hie thee
off to exit0
I report spam to SpamCop among other places.
I get mail from several upstream places (where I don't
have control of the SA parameters), so when I get spam,
it's often wrapped in a variety of different ways
(sometimes as a MIME attachment, sometimes with SA
results in the headers, etc.).
I'd
At 03:32 PM 9/18/2004 +, John Owens wrote:
I'd like to send as original a message as I can to
SpamCop and other places since they don't like
munged reports. Currently I'm doing this manually,
which is annoying. I note that sa-learn knows how
to remove all SA-specific annotations from a message
Hi!
in the last week or two, we have been getting some
spam that spamassassin doesn't seem to recognize.
A common feature of all these messages seems to be
that they contain lots of special characters
(~, ^, `, and others) mixed into the text.
I put some examples up at http://marie.vtl.ee/spam.txt
Andre Nicholson wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
John Owens wrote:
I'd like to send as original a message as I can to
SpamCop and other places since they don't like munged reports. Currently
I'm doing this manually,
which is annoying. I note that sa-learn knows how to remove all
I just upgraded to 3.0.7-1 and noticed an slight oddity in the logs now beig
created. In my smb.conf I have:
log level = 2
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
Since upgrading I now get two logs for smbd and two for nmbd...
114676 Sep 18 07:19 /var/log/samba/log.nmbd
100728 Sep 18 15:35
13 matches
Mail list logo
